Malaysian Hospitals on the web: A multi-criteria assessment of official websites

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v8n2.14949

Authors

  • Demetrios Sarantis United Nations University Operating Unit on Policy-Driven Electronic Governance, Guimarães, Portugal
  • Ronald Musizvingoza UNU International Institute for Global Health (UNU-IIGH), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Masilamany Shameeta UNU International Institute for Global Health (UNU-IIGH), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Delfina Soares United Nations University Operating Unit on Policy-Driven Electronic Governance, Guimarães, Portugal
  • Joana Carvalho United Nations University Operating Unit on Policy-Driven Electronic Governance, Guimarães, Portugal

Keywords:

assessment, evaluation, health, hospital, website

Abstract

This study thoroughly examines and assesses hospital websites in Malaysia according to a predefined list of indicators and sub-indicators, based on four criteria: Technology Features, Content, Services, and Community Interaction, as defined in the Health Sector Website Assessment Index (HSWAI). A total of 107 Malaysia hospitals were assessed. Private and university hospitals outperform public ones, especially in online appointment management and patient care automation areas. Most hospital websites perform well in the technology features criterion and satisfactorily on content, but show shortcomings in accessibility, reliability, research and teaching, participation, and community interaction elements, and most of them fall short in quality metrics data. Malaysian hospitals should adopt best practices to improve their websites concerning accessibility, reliability, services, and community interaction. The website design should endeavour to include multiple stakeholders, considering people with disabilities, in line with the sustainable development goals of leaving no one behind. Additionally, websites should ensure the dissemination of evidence-based information while taking advantage of social media to reach a wider audience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, S. A. (2010). Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: an inter-disciplinary literature and website review. International journal of medical informatics, 79(6), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006

Ahmed, S., Sanghvi, K., & Yeo, D. (2020). Telemedicine takes centre stage during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Innov, 6(4), 252-254.

Alajarmeh, N. (2022). Evaluating the accessibility of public health websites: an exploratory cross-country study. Universal access in the information society, 21(3), 771-789.

Alhuwail, D., AlMeraj, Z., & Boujarwah, F. (2018). Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 18, 1-11.

Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2017). The future of truth and misinformation online.

Antona, M., Ioannidi, D., Foukarakis, M., Gerlowska, J., Rejdak, K., Abdelnour, C., ... & Roberto, N. (2019). My robot is happy today: how older people with mild cognitive impairments understand assistive robots' affective output. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (pp. 416-424).

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2014). World Wide Web Access: Disability Discrimination Act Advisory Notes ver 4.1 (2014) | Australian Human Rights Commission.

Bach, M. P., Seljan, S., Jaković, B., Buljan, A., & Zoroja, J. (2019). Hospital websites: from the information repository to interactive channel. Procedia computer science, 164, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.155

Bakhshi, M., Monem, H., Barati, O., Sharifian, R., & Nematollahi, M. (2017). Structural investigation of websites of selected educational hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from Patient Relationship Management (PRM) perspective. Electronic Physician, 9(7), 4786–4790.

Boon-itt, S. (2019). Quality of health websites and their influence on perceived usefulness, trust and intention to use: an analysis from Thailand. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 4.

Congressional Research Service. (2022). The Americans with Disabilities Act in Cyberspace: Website Accessibility Standards (No. LSB10845). US Congress.

De Song, X., Du, T. Y., Zhou, P., & Xue, D. (2015). Assessing the quality of public hospital websites in China. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 18(2), 557.

Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., ... & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554-559.

Farrahi, R., Gilasi, H., Khademi, S., & Chopannejad, S. (2018). Towards a comprehensive quality evaluation model for hospital websites. Acta Informatica Medica, 26(4), 274.

Ford, E. W., Huerta, T. R., Diana, M. L., Kazley, A. S., & Menachemi, N. (2013). Patient satisfaction scores and their relationship to hospital website quality measures. Health marketing quarterly, 30(4), 334-348.

Glover, M., Khalilzadeh, O., Choy, G., Prabhakar, A. M., Pandharipande, P. V., & Gazelle, G. S. (2015). Hospital evaluations by social media: a comparative analysis of Facebook ratings among performance outliers. Journal of general internal medicine, 30, 1440-1446.

Iyanna, S., Kaur, P., Ractham, P., Talwar, S., & Islam, A. N. (2022). Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users?. Journal of Business Research, 153, 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.007

Jeddi, F. R., Gilasi, H., & Khademi, S. (2017). Evaluation models and criteria of the quality of hospital websites: a systematic review study. Electronic Physician, 9(2), 3786.

Jonsson, M., Gustavsson, C., Gulliksen, J., & Johansson, S. (2023). How have public healthcare providers in Sweden conformed to the European Union’s Web Accessibility Directive regarding accessibility statements on their websites?. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-14.

Junaid, S. B., Imam, A. A., Balogun, A. O., De Silva, L. C., Surakat, Y. A., Kumar, G., ... & Mahamad, S. (2022, October). Recent advancements in emerging technologies for healthcare management systems: a survey. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 10, p. 1940). MDPI.

Koehle, H., Kronk, C., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). Digital health equity: Addressing power, usability, and trust to strengthen health systems. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 31(01), 020-032.

Król, K., & Zdonek, D. (2021). The quality of infectious disease hospital websites in poland in light of the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 642.

Lee, K., Hoti, K., Hughes, J. D., & Emmerton, L. (2014). Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(12), e262.

Liu, X., Bao, Z., Liu, H., & Wang, Z. (2011). The quality and characteristics of leading general hospitals’ websites in China. Journal of medical systems, 35, 1553-1562.

Macakoğlu, Ş. S., & Peker, S. (2023). Accessibility evaluation of university hospital websites in Turkey. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(3), 1085-1093.

Rafe, V., & Monfaredzadeh, M. (2012). A qualitative framework to assess hospital/medical websites. Journal of medical systems, 36, 2927-2939.

Raji, S. O., Mahmud, M., & Abubakr, A. (2013). Evaluation of university teaching hospital websites in nigeria. Procedia Technology, 9, 1058-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.118

Roy, C. K., Cordy, J. R., & Koschke, R. (2009). Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools: A qualitative approach. Science of computer programming, 74(7), 470-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.02.007

Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani, S., Abumasoudi, R. S., Esmaeli, N., Saberi, T., & Mahmodi, N. (2019). Evaluation of the website of public hospitals in Isfahan with the WebMedQual approach in 2018. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 7.

Salarvand, S., Samadbeik, M., Tarrahi, M. J., & Salarvand, H. (2016). Quality of public hospitals websites: a cross-sectional analytical study in Iran. Acta Informatica Medica, 24(2), 130.

Sarantis, D., Papadopoulos, S., Soares, D., & Carvalho, J. (2023, April). Design and Implementation of Hospital Online Services: In-Depth Assessment of Greece. In 2023 Ninth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Sarantis, D., Soares, D. S., & Carvalho, J. (2022). Assessment of hospitals' websites in Portugal. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 995153.

Sarantis, D., Soares, D., & Carvalho, J. (2020). HSWAI: a health sector website assessment instrument. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 359-368).

Sarantis, D., Soares, D., & Carvalho, J. (2023, December). Assessing the Progress of Portuguese Hospitals’ Online Services. In European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems (pp. 225-233). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Serbanati, L. D., Ricci, F. L., Mercurio, G., & Vasilateanu, A. (2011). Steps towards a digital health ecosystem. Journal of biomedical informatics, 44(4), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.02.011

Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological indicators, 15(1), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007

Soares, D. (2017). Literature on Website Evaluation in Health Sector.

Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., ... & Zhou, J. (2019). Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1229-1269.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., Herrera-Velázquez, M. R., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Health education programs and their importance for disease prevention and health promotion. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(3), xi-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n3.13788

Verlicchi, P., Al Aukidy, M., & Zambello, E. (2015). What have we learned from worldwide experiences on the management and treatment of hospital effluent?—An overview and a discussion on perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 514, 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.020

Viswanadham, N. (2021). Ecosystem model for healthcare platform. Sādhanā, 46(4), 188.

Wang, F., & Luo, W. (2005). Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health & place, 11(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.02.003

World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. World Health Organization.

Yan, A., Zou, Y., & Mirchandani, D. A. (2020). How hospitals in mainland China responded to the outbreak of COVID-19 using information technology–enabled services: An analysis of hospital news webpages. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(7), 991-999.

Yang, P. C., Chu, F. Y., Liu, H. Y., Shih, M. J., Chen, T. J., Chou, L. F., & Hwang, S. J. (2019). Features of online hospital appointment systems in Taiwan: a nationwide survey. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(2), 171.

Zhao, P., Yoo, I., Lavoie, J., Lavoie, B. J., & Simoes, E. (2017). Web-based medical appointment systems: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(4), e134.

Published

24-06-2024

How to Cite

Sarantis, D., Musizvingoza, R., Shameeta, M., Soares, D., & Carvalho, J. (2024). Malaysian Hospitals on the web: A multi-criteria assessment of official websites. International Journal of Health Sciences, 8(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v8n2.14949

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles