Stability of single 3-D trapezoidal plate in condylar fracture in comparison to 2 Miniplates

A prospective clinical study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.4783

Authors

  • Varun Arya Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugam, Address: B-47 A Vijay Nagar Single Storey, Delhi-110009
  • Sundeep Sharma H-39/2, first floor, Block H, DLF Phase -1, DLF City, Gurugram -122002 Orcid ID: 0000-0003-0240-6090
  • Keerat Preet Koour Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Budhera. Gurugram- 123505
  • Aasimah Hameed Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Budhera. Gurugram- 123505
  • Jingade Krishnojirao Dayashankara Rao Associate Professor, Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Science, Collage of Dentistry, Qassim University, Address: Postal Box 1162, Qassim Region, Al-Mulida, North of Prince Nayef bin Abdulaziz International Airport, Saudi Arabia
  • Ayushi Gupta Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Budhera. Gurugram- 123505

Keywords:

condylar fracture, condylar head, fixation methods, internal fixation, open reduction

Abstract

Background: Condylar fractures account for one third of all mandibular fractures being in the range of 17.5–52%1, 2 of all mandibular fractures. The main goal in the treatment of condylar fractures is to predictably restore pre-injury anatomical form, with associated aesthetics and function. Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and stability of single 3-D trapezoidal condylar plate and compare it with 2.0mm conventional miniplates in the Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of mandibular sub-condylar fractures. Methods: This study was conducted on 20 patients with subcondylar fracture.10 patients were allotted by random sampling in each Group. 3-D trapezoidal condylar plates were used in Group A and 2.0mm conventional minplates were used in Group B. The mini retromandibular surgical approach was common to both the groups. Function and stability was assessed post operatively at 1st, 3rd and 6th month respectively. Results: Intergroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference in results with respect to function and the stability of the fractured fragments. Conclusion: 3D trapezoidal condylar plates are more stable and structurally more efficient in reducing the torque forces leading to better osteosynthesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel-Galil, K., & Loukota, R. (2010). Fractures of the mandibular condyle: evidence base and current concepts of management. British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 48(7), 520-526.

Asprino, L., Consani, S., & de Moraes, M. (2006). A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 64(3), 452-456.

Champy, M., Pape, H. D., Gerlach, K. L., & Lodde, J. P. (1986). The Strasbourg miniplate osteosynthesis. Oral and maxillofacial traumatology, 2, 19-41.

Chaudhary, M., Pant, H., Singh, M., Vashistha, A., & Kaur, G. (2015). Evaluation of trapezoidal-shaped 3-D plates for internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures in adults. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research, 5(3), 134-139.

Ehrenfeld, M., Roser, M., Hagenmaier, C., & Mast, G. (1996). Treatment of mandibular fractures with different fixation techniques--results of a prospective fracture study. Fortschritte der Kiefer-und Gesichts-chirurgie, 41, 67-71.

Ellis III, E. (1998). Complications of mandibular condyle fractures. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 27(4), 255-257.

Ellis III, E., & Dean, J. (1993). Rigid fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, 76(1), 6-15.

Ellis III, E., McFadden, D., Simon, P., & Throckmorton, G. (2000). Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 58(9), 950-958.

Ellis III, E., Moos, K. F., & El-Attar, A. (1985). Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, 59(2), 120-129.

Farmand, M. (1993). The 3-D plating system in maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51(3), 166-167.

Farmand, M. (1995). Three-dimensional plate fixation of fractures and osteotomies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 3(1), 39-56..

Farmand, M., & Dupoirieux, L. (1992). The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery. Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale, 93(6), 353-357.

Girotto, R., Mancini, P., & Balercia, P. (2012). The retromandibular transparotid approach: Our clinical experience. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 40(1), 78-81.

Gupta, M., Iyer, N., Das, D., & Nagaraj, J. (2012). Analysis of different treatment protocols for fractures of condylar process of mandible. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 70(1), 83-91.

Hammer, B., Schier, P., & Prein, J. (1997). Osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures: a review of 30 patients. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 35(4), 288-291.

Haug, R. H., & Assael, L. A. (2001). Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 59(4), 370-375.

Hyde, N., Manisali, M., Aghabeigi, B., Sneddon, K., & Newman, L. (2002). The role of open reduction and internal fixation in unilateral fractures of the mandibular condyle: a prospective study. British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 40(1), 19-22.

Iizuka, T., Lädrach, K., Geering, A. H., & Raveh, J. (1998). Open reduction without fixation of dislocated condylar process fractures: long-term clinical and radiologic analysis. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 56(5), 553-561.

Jain, V., Mathur, V. P., & Kumar, A. (2013). A preliminary study to find a possible association between occlusal wear and maximum bite force in humans. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 71(1), 96-101.

Kallela, I., Söderholm, A. L., Paukku, P., & Lindqvist, C. (1995). Lag-screw osteosynthesis of mandibular condyle fractures: a clinical and radiological study. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 53(12), 1397-1404.

Klotch, D. W., & Lundy, L. B. (1991). Condylar neck fractures of the mandible. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 24(1), 181-194.

Martini, M. Z., Takahashi, A., Oliveira Neto, H. G. D., Carvalho Júnior, J. P. D., Curcio, R., & Shinohara, E. H. (2006). Epidemiology of mandibular fractures treated in a Brazilian level I trauma public hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian dental journal, 17, 243-248.

Messer, E. J. (1972). A simplified method for fixation of the fractured mandibular condyle. Journal of Oral Surgery (American Dental Association: 1965), 30(6), 442-443.

Meyer, C., Kahn, J. L., Boutemi, P., & Wilk, A. (2002). Photoelastic analysis of bone deformation in the region of the mandibular condyle during mastication. Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery, 30(3), 160-169.

Meyer, C., Martin, E., Jean-Luc, K. A. H. N., & Simone, Z. I. N. K. (2007). Development and biomechanical testing of a new osteosynthesis plate (TCP®) designed to stabilize mandibular condyle fractures. Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery, 35(2), 84-90.

Meyer, C., Serhir, L., & Boutemi, P. (2006). Experimental evaluation of three osteosynthesis devices used for stabilizing condylar fractures of the mandible. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 34(3), 173-181.

Meyer, C., Zink, S., Chatelain, B., & Wilk, A. (2008). Clinical experience with osteosynthesis of subcondylar fractures of the mandible using TCP® plates. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 36(5), 260-268.

Oikarinen, V. J., & Lindqvist, C. (1975). The frequency of facial bone fractures in patients with multiple injuries sustained in traffic accidents. In Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society supplementum (Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 53-57). Suomen Hammaslaeaekaeriseura-Finska Tandlaekarsaellskapet.

Parascandolo, S., Spinzia, A., Parascandolo, S., Piombino, P., & Califano, L. (2010). Two load sharing plates fixation in mandibular condylar fractures: biomechanical basis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 38(5), 385-390.

Rallis, G., Mourouzis, C., Ainatzoglou, M., Mezitis, M., & Zachariades, N. (2003). Plate osteosynthesis of condylar fractures: a retrospective study of 45 patients. Quintessence international, 34(1).

Shinogaya, T., Tanaka, Y., Toda, S., & Hayakawa, I. (2002). A new approach to evaluating occlusal support by analyzing the center of the bite force. Clinical Oral Investigations, 6(4), 249-256.

Singh, G., Mohammad, S., Das, S., Passi, D., Vishwakarma, K., & Mahajan, N. (2013). Trapezoidal condylar plate: report of 15 cases in the management of mandibular subcondylar fracture. J Adv Med Dent Sci, 1(2), 13-18.

Spinzia, A., Patrone, R., Belli, E., Dell’Aversana Orabona, G., Ungari, C., Filiaci, F., ... & Piombino, P. (2014). Open reduction and internal fixation of extracapsular mandibular condyle fractures: a long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of 25 patients. BMC surgery, 14(1), 1-10.

Sugiura, T., Yamamoto, K., Murakami, K., & Sugimura, M. (2001). A comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis with lag screws, miniplates, or Kirschner wires for mandibular condylar process fractures. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 59(10), 1161-1168.

Tominaga, K., Habu, M., Khanal, A., Mimori, Y., Yoshioka, I., & Fukuda, J. (2006). Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 64(10), 1510-1516.

Undt, G., Kermer, C., Rasse, M., Sinko, K., & Ewers, R. (1999). Transoral miniplate osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 88(5), 534-543.

Wagner, A., Krach, W., Schicho, K., Undt, G., Ploder, O., & Ewers, R. (2002). A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 94(6), 678-686.

Widmark, G., Bågenholm, T., Kahnberg, K. E., & Lindahl, L. (1996). Open reduction of subcondylar fractures: A study of functional rehabilitation. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 25(2), 107-111.

Wright, K. H. Sons; Bristol: 1974. Fractures of the Mandible.[Google Scholar].

Zachariades, N., Mezitis, M., Mourouzis, C., Papadakis, D., & Spanou, A. (2006). Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 34(7), 421-432.

Zachariades, N., Mezitis, M., Mourouzis, C., Papadakis, D., & Spanou, A. (2006). Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 34(7), 421-432.

Published

14-03-2022

How to Cite

Arya, V., Sharma, S., Koour, K. P., Hameed, A., Dayashankara Rao, J. K., & Gupta, A. (2022). Stability of single 3-D trapezoidal plate in condylar fracture in comparison to 2 Miniplates: A prospective clinical study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.4783

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles