Assessment of efficiency of arm force only versus arm force plus wrist movement during closed method extractions

Shivendra Choudhary; Abhishek Sinha; Leena Priya; Taruna Taruna; Daya Shankar

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6804

Assessment of efficiency of arm force only versus arm force plus wrist movement during closed method extractions

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6804

Authors

Shivendra Choudhary MDS, Professor & Head Dept of Dentistry, Patna Medical College, Patna-4
Abhishek Sinha
drsinhaabhi@gmail.com
MDS (Orthodontics), Assistant professor, Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College
Leena Priya (MDS)(Oral Medicine and Radiology), Senior Resident ( Department of Dentistry)PMCH, Patna
Taruna (MDS), Senior Resident, Patna Medical College & Hospital
Daya Shankar (MDS), Ex Assist prof., Department of Dentistry , PMCH, Patna

Keywords:

arm force, extraction, wrist force

Abstract

Background: Atraumatic dental extraction preserves bone and maintains gingival architecture, thereby ensuring the option of replacement with implant supported prosthesis. The present study was conducted to compare the efficiency of arm force only versus arm force plus wrist movement during closed method extractions. Materials & Methods: 84 patients undergoing mandibular molar extraction of both genders were selected. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Each group comprised of 42 patients. In group I, interns used arm force only while in group II, interns used both arm force and wrist movement in extraction of mandibular molar. Parameters such as time taken for extraction, root fracture, bone plate facture, and adherence of buccal plate to the root were assessed. Results: Group I had 22 males and 20 females and group II had 18 males and 24 females. The mean time taken for extraction was 10.2 minutes in group I and 5.4 minutes in group II. The difference was significant (P< 0.05).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson HF. Some early dental extraction instruments including the pelican, bird or axe? Aust Dent J 2002;47:2.

Caplanis N, Lozada JL, Kan JY. Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005;33:853 63.

Patel HS, Managutti AM, Menat S, Agarwal A, Shah D, Patel J. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forceps versus conventional forceps in orthodontic extractions: A prospective randomized split mouth study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:41 5.

Misch CE, Perez HM. Atraumatic extractions: A biomechanical rationale. Dent Today 2008;27:98, 100 1.

Muska E, Walter C, Knight A, Taneja P, Bulsara Y, Hahn M, et al. Atraumatic vertical tooth extraction: A proof of principle clinical study of a novel system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:e303 10.

Kosinski T. Use of innovative physics forceps for extractions in preparation for dental implants. Implant News Views 2012;14:1 2.

Choi YH, Bae JH, Kim YK. Atraumatic safe extraction for intentional replantation. J Korean Acad Cons Dent 2011;36:211 8.

Angelillo IF, Nobile CG, Pavia M. Survey of reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Italy. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:336-40.

Murray H, Locker D, Kay EJ. Patterns of and reasons for tooth extractions in general dental practice in Ontario, Canada. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:196-200.

McCaul LK, Jenkins WM, Kay EJ. The reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Scotland: A 15-year follow-up study. Br Dent J 2001;190:658-62.

Cheung LK, Chow LK, Tsang MH, Tung LK. An evaluation of complications following dental extractions using either sterile or clean gloves. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:550-4.

Sundaram P, Kandasamy S, John RR, Sri KC. Comparison of the efficiency of arm force versus arm force plus wrist movement in closed method extractions an observational study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2021;12:250-4.

Stubinger S1, von Rechenberg VB, Zeilhofer HF, Sader R, Landes C. Er:YAG laser osteotomy for removal of impacted teeth: Clinical comparison of two techniques. Lasers Surg Med 2007;39:583‑8.

Cicciù M, Bramanti E, Signorino F, Cicciù A, Sortino F. Experimental study on strength evaluation applied for teeth extraction: An in vivo study. Open Dent J 2013;7:20 6.

Published

30-04-2022

How to Cite

Choudhary, S., Sinha, A., Priya, L., Taruna, T., & Shankar, D. (2022). Assessment of efficiency of arm force only versus arm force plus wrist movement during closed method extractions. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 7200–7205. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6804

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 6 No. S2 (2022)

Section

Peer Review Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.