Evaluation the policy of establishment satgas gotong royong based on traditional village in handling COVID-19 in Denpasar City
Keywords:
COVID-19, evaluation, public policy, SATGAS Gotong Royong, traditional villageAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a wide impact on various fields of human life in the world. Efforts to deal with COVID in Indonesia have led to various policies both at the national and regional levels. Similarly, the policy for handling COVID-19 in the Province of Bali. One of the policies is the policy of establishing the SATGAS Gotong Royong based on traditional village. The policy in its implementation produces various achievements according to the conditions of the community in which the policy is implemented. The case in Denpasar City, as an urban city with high interaction of activities and human mobility, it is certainly different from other regencies in Bali with more homogeneous community conditions. This qualitative research with a case study approach wants to evaluate the policy of establishing the SATGAS Gotong Royong based on traditional village in handling COVID-19 in Denpasar City. This needs to be done as a form of supervision because no matter how good a new policy is, its success or failure will be known through an assessment called evaluation.
Downloads
References
Akbar, M. F. (2016). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Pemberian Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (Studi Kasus pada Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Mamuju Utara). JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 47-64.
Astina, I. K., Sukristyanto, A., & Darmawan, A. (2018). Improving policy of the Republic of Indonesia performance in Bali regional police environment. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n3.226
Bauer, J. C. (2003). Peran Ambiguitas dan Peran Kejelasan: Perbandingan antara Sikap di Jerman dan Amerika Serikat. Disertasi, Universitas Cincinnati–Clermont.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
Budi, W. (2005). Teori dan Proses Kebijakan Publik, Yogyakarta.
Del Brío, J. Á., & Junquera, B. (2003). A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies. Technovation, 23(12), 939-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00036-6
Dewi, K. R. P., & Sunarta, I. N. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat (PPKM) Darurat Jawa-Bali Dalam Menanggulangi COVID-19 Di Kota Denpasar. Restorica: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(2), 11-20.
Dewi, L. K. Y. (2014). Modeling the relationships between tourism sustainable factor in the traditional village of Pancasari. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.325
Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding Public Policy, Prince Hall, Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey, United State of America.
Faisal, S. (1989). Format-format penelitian sosial: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Grindle, M. S., & Thomas, J. W. (1989). Policy makers, policy choices, and policy outcomes: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Policy sciences, 22(3-4), 213-248.
Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of econometrics, 6, 4779-4874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4412(07)06070-9
Islamy, M. I. (2009). Kebijakan Publik, Edisi Kesatu Cetakan Keempat, Penerbit UT, Jakarta.
Jung, C., Krutilla, K., & Boyd, R. (1996). Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: An evaluation of policy alternatives. Journal of environmental economics and management, 30(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0007
Kawengian, D. D., & Rares, J. J. (2015). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perdagangan Manusia (Trafficking) Terutama Perempuan dan Anak di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 4(5).
Kaye, A. D., Okeagu, C. N., Pham, A. D., Silva, R. A., Hurley, J. J., Arron, B. L., ... & Cornett, E. M. (2021). Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 35(3), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009
Leo, A. (2006). Dasar-Dasar kebijakan publik: alfabeta. jakarta.
Liu, S., Ge, J., Bai, M., Yao, M., He, L., & Chen, M. (2022). Toward classification-based sustainable revitalization: Assessing the vitality of traditional villages. Land Use Policy, 116, 106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106060
Martin, P. (1999). Public policies, regional inequalities and growth. Journal of public economics, 73(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00110-8
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). †Analisis data kualitatif: buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru/Matthew B. Miles dan A. Michael Huberman.
Moleong, L. (2007). J.(2007) Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Offset, Bandung.
Nugroho, R. (2014). Public Policy: Teori, Manajemen, Dinamika, Analisis, Konvergensi, dan Kimia Kebijakan. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Soerjono, S. (2009). Peranan Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Subarsono, A. G. (2012). Analisis kebijakan publik: konsep, teori dan aplikasi.
Wang, D., Zhu, Y., Zhao, M., & Lv, Q. (2021). Multi-dimensional hollowing characteristics of traditional villages and its influence mechanism based on the micro-scale: A case study of Dongcun Village in Suzhou, China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105146
Whitelaw, S., Mamas, M. A., Topol, E., & Van Spall, H. G. (2020). Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(8), e435-e440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30142-4
Widodo, J. (2021). Analisis kebijakan publik: Konsep dan aplikasi analisis proses kebijakan publik. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of social sciences and humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJSSH right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJSSH can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJSSH volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
