Principle of legal presumption as notaries legal protection in carrying out their duties and authorities

Kadek Ayu Irma Hilmiafami; A A Istri Ari Atu Dewi

doi:10.53730/ijssh.v8n2.14944

Authors

Kadek Ayu Irma Hilmiafami
kadekayuirmah15@gmail.com
Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
A. A. Istri Ari Atu Dewi Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

authority, fraud, law, legal protection, notary

Abstract

As a means of legal defense for Notaries, this study seeks to examine and expand the use of the Principle of Legal Presumption in the creation of Authentic Deeds. This study is normative since Law No. 2 of 2014, An Act to Amend Law No. 30 of 2004 Concerning Notary Positions, leaves open a conceptual norm vacuum in the area of Notary Protection in the performance of their official duties and responsibilities. This paper takes a philosophical and legal approach to the question. This study's findings indicate that the Notary's Authentic Deed, prepared in line with the agreement and using accurate information from the Faces, is free of any formal or material flaws. As a result, in the event of future difficulties, the Principle of Legal Presumption should be invoked to safeguard Notaries against potential deception on the part of the Claimants. Law No. 2 of 2014, An Act to Amend Law No. 30 of 2004, emphasizes the need for Notary protection procedures to reduce roadblocks to the implementation of the Principle of Legal Presumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, H. (2002). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Reflika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan pembatalan akta Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2021). A Proposal: The Beginning of a Notary Deed for Sharia Banking Deals. ENDLESS: International Journal of Future Studies, 4(1), 168-177.

Bac, M., & Bag, P. K. (2001). Law enforcement and legal presumptions. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(4), 722-748. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2001.1743

Boediarto, M. A. (2005). Kompilasi Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung. Hukum Acara Perdata Setengah Abad, Swa Justitia, Jakarta.

Cahyanti, N., Raharjo, B., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2018). Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 288-294.

Chen, K. C., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. J. (2009). Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of corporate finance, 15(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.01.001

Herningtyas, T., Azrianti, S., Artanto, T., & Riyanto, A. (2022). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Notaris Berkaitan Dengan Keterangan Palsu. PETITA, 4(1), 55-64.

Hildebrandt, M., & Tielemans, L. (2013). Data protection by design and technology neutral law. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(5), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.004

Hoffman, P. T., Postel-Vinay, G., & Rosenthal, J. L. (2015). Entry, information, and financial development: A century of competition between French banks and notaries. Explorations in Economic History, 55, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2014.04.002

Jalal, A., Suwitno, S., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2018). Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan Dalam Pemalsuan Dokumen. Jurnal akta, 5(1), 227-233.

Kie, T. T. (2000). Notary Studies–All Things Notary Practice. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta.

Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Culture, law, and corporate governance. International review of law and economics, 25(2), 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2005.06.005

Lin, H., Cao, Z., Liang, X., & Shao, J. (2010). Secure threshold multi authority attribute based encryption without a central authority. Information Sciences, 180(13), 2618-2632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.03.004

Listiana, A. (2020). Kekuatan Klausula Pengaman Diri Dalam Akta Bagi Notaris.

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.

Nahak, S. (2017). Criminal law policy on land functions impacting climate change in Indonesian national law perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.50

Noailly, J., & Nahuis, R. (2010). Entry and competition in the Dutch notary profession. International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.11.001

Parsa, I. W., & Ariawan, I. G. K. (2018). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Autentik. Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, 3(1), 59-74.

Prananda, V. O., & Anand, G. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Oleh Penghadap Yang Dinyatakan Palsu (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006). Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan, 2(1).

Ritonga, A. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Gugatan Pembatalan Akta Pemindahan dan Penyerahan Hak Atas Tanah dengan Ganti Rugi yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris (Berdasarkan Putusan Ma Nomor 80/pdt. g/2015/pn. lbp). Premise Law Journal, 16, 164897.

Taliwongso, C. A. A. (2022). Kedudukan Akta Otentik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perdata Di Tinjau Dari Pasal 1870 KUH Perdata (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 347/Pdt. G/2012/PN. Mdn). Lex Administratum, 10(2).

Tresna, R. (2005). Komentar HIR. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Undang – Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris

Utomo, H. I. W. (2018). Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris: Bahan Diskusi Dalam Persiapan Menghadapi Ujian Kode Etik Notaris. Makalah, disampaikan pada acara Belajar Bareng Alumni, Universitas Narotama Surabaya, Februari.

Valentino, F., & Dahana, C. D. (2022). Pencegahan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kriminalisasi Jabatan Notaris. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(2), 330-342.

Van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of experimental social psychology, 47(1), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.003