Principle of legal presumption as notaries legal protection in carrying out their duties and authorities
Keywords:
authority, fraud, law, legal protection, notaryAbstract
As a means of legal defense for Notaries, this study seeks to examine and expand the use of the Principle of Legal Presumption in the creation of Authentic Deeds. This study is normative since Law No. 2 of 2014, An Act to Amend Law No. 30 of 2004 Concerning Notary Positions, leaves open a conceptual norm vacuum in the area of Notary Protection in the performance of their official duties and responsibilities. This paper takes a philosophical and legal approach to the question. This study's findings indicate that the Notary's Authentic Deed, prepared in line with the agreement and using accurate information from the Faces, is free of any formal or material flaws. As a result, in the event of future difficulties, the Principle of Legal Presumption should be invoked to safeguard Notaries against potential deception on the part of the Claimants. Law No. 2 of 2014, An Act to Amend Law No. 30 of 2004, emphasizes the need for Notary protection procedures to reduce roadblocks to the implementation of the Principle of Legal Presumption.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H. (2002). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Reflika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan pembatalan akta Notaris. Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2021). A Proposal: The Beginning of a Notary Deed for Sharia Banking Deals. ENDLESS: International Journal of Future Studies, 4(1), 168-177.
Bac, M., & Bag, P. K. (2001). Law enforcement and legal presumptions. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(4), 722-748. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2001.1743
Boediarto, M. A. (2005). Kompilasi Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung. Hukum Acara Perdata Setengah Abad, Swa Justitia, Jakarta.
Cahyanti, N., Raharjo, B., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2018). Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 288-294.
Chen, K. C., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. J. (2009). Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of corporate finance, 15(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.01.001
Herningtyas, T., Azrianti, S., Artanto, T., & Riyanto, A. (2022). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Notaris Berkaitan Dengan Keterangan Palsu. PETITA, 4(1), 55-64.
Hildebrandt, M., & Tielemans, L. (2013). Data protection by design and technology neutral law. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(5), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.004
Hoffman, P. T., Postel-Vinay, G., & Rosenthal, J. L. (2015). Entry, information, and financial development: A century of competition between French banks and notaries. Explorations in Economic History, 55, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2014.04.002
Jalal, A., Suwitno, S., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2018). Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan Dalam Pemalsuan Dokumen. Jurnal akta, 5(1), 227-233.
Kie, T. T. (2000). Notary Studies–All Things Notary Practice. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta.
Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Culture, law, and corporate governance. International review of law and economics, 25(2), 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2005.06.005
Lin, H., Cao, Z., Liang, X., & Shao, J. (2010). Secure threshold multi authority attribute based encryption without a central authority. Information Sciences, 180(13), 2618-2632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.03.004
Listiana, A. (2020). Kekuatan Klausula Pengaman Diri Dalam Akta Bagi Notaris.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
Nahak, S. (2017). Criminal law policy on land functions impacting climate change in Indonesian national law perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.50
Noailly, J., & Nahuis, R. (2010). Entry and competition in the Dutch notary profession. International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.11.001
Parsa, I. W., & Ariawan, I. G. K. (2018). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Autentik. Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, 3(1), 59-74.
Prananda, V. O., & Anand, G. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Oleh Penghadap Yang Dinyatakan Palsu (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006). Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan, 2(1).
Ritonga, A. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Gugatan Pembatalan Akta Pemindahan dan Penyerahan Hak Atas Tanah dengan Ganti Rugi yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris (Berdasarkan Putusan Ma Nomor 80/pdt. g/2015/pn. lbp). Premise Law Journal, 16, 164897.
Taliwongso, C. A. A. (2022). Kedudukan Akta Otentik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perdata Di Tinjau Dari Pasal 1870 KUH Perdata (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 347/Pdt. G/2012/PN. Mdn). Lex Administratum, 10(2).
Tresna, R. (2005). Komentar HIR. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Undang – Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
Utomo, H. I. W. (2018). Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris: Bahan Diskusi Dalam Persiapan Menghadapi Ujian Kode Etik Notaris. Makalah, disampaikan pada acara Belajar Bareng Alumni, Universitas Narotama Surabaya, Februari.
Valentino, F., & Dahana, C. D. (2022). Pencegahan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kriminalisasi Jabatan Notaris. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(2), 330-342.
Van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of experimental social psychology, 47(1), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.003
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 International journal of social sciences and humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJSSH right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJSSH can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJSSH volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.