Law enforcement of criminal acts of traffic violations: Alternative case studies in the settlement of criminal acts of traffic violations

Annie Myranika

doi:10.53730/ijssh.v6n1.3829

Authors

Annie Myranika
amyranika@unis.ac.id
Islamic Sheikh Yusuf University, Tangerang, Indonesia

Keywords:

alternative case, criminal acts, law enforcement, traffic violations, violators

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out: (1). A new idea in the application of a traffic violation settlement model. (2). The settlement model for traffic violations is given proof violation. (3). The new traffic violation crime model in the form of a SIM or STNK was not confiscated by officers, but an ID card as collateral. (4). Violators pay the ticket via ATM, internet banking, and phone banking. This research method uses descriptive qualitative. Data collection techniques are in-depth interviews, field surveys which are analyzed as data, literature studies in the form of notes, videos, CCTV, and other documents. The obstacles in the practice of law enforcement of traffic crime violations have not gone well (1). Human resource constraints for law enforcement are still limited (2). Facilities and infrastructure constraints (3). Law enforcement cultural factors and community factors. Conclusion: (1). The idea of an alternative model for solving traffic violations is simple, fast, cheap, and uncomplicated (2). The idea of a model for completing a SIM and STNK ticket was not confiscated, but an ID card. (3). Violators who have paid a fine through the bank then the bank will forward it to the traffic police sub-directorate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alghuson, M., Abdelghany, K., & Hassan, A. (2019). Toward an integrated traffic law enforcement and network management in connected vehicle environment: Conceptual model and survey study of public acceptance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 133, 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105300

Andrisman, T. (2009). Principles and Basic Rules of Indonesian Criminal Law.

Arliman, L. (2015). Penegakan Hukum dan Kesadaran Masyarakat. Deepublish.

Atmaja, G. M. W. (2018). Legal pluralism politics towards recognition of social unity in customary law and local regulation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n2.152

Badri, M., Masriyani, M., & Islah, I. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Jambi. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 16(1), 23-27.

Bjørnskau, T., & Elvik, R. (1992). Can road traffic law enforcement permanently reduce the number of accidents?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 24(5), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(92)90059-R

Castellà, J., & Pérez, J. (2004). Sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward and traffic violations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(6), 947-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2003.10.003

Castillo-Manzano, J. I., Castro-Nuño, M., López-Valpuesta, L., & Pedregal, D. J. (2019). From legislation to compliance: The power of traffic law enforcement for the case study of Spain. Transport policy, 75, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.009

Cecil, A. R. (2011). Penegakan Hukum Lalu Lintas. Bandung: Nuansa.

Danang, S. B. (2011). Budaya Tertib Lalu Lintas. Jakarta: Sarana Bangun Pustaka.

Effendi, T. (2013). The Criminal Justice System: Comparison of Components and Processes of the Criminal Justice System in Several Countries. Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta.

Elisabeth, N. B. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Langkah-Langkah Untuk Menemukan Kebenaran Dalam Ilmu Hukum. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

González-Iglesias, B., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Luengo-Martín, M. Á. (2012). Driving anger and traffic violations: Gender differences. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 15(4), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.002

Gunadi, I., & Efendi, J. (2014). Cepat dan mudah memahami hukum pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hartono, M. S. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengganti Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Oleh Anak Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian: Suatu Analisis Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).

Husin, K. (2019). Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Ibrahim, A. H., Husain, T., Handji, S. B., & Suhu, B. L. (2020). The effectiveness of driving license services in police station traffic unit. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v4n3.463

Kondoahi, A. V. (2015). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Anak yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas. Lex et Societatis, 2(7).

Kusmagi, M. A. (2010). Selamat berkendara di jalan raya. PT Niaga Swadaya.

Muhammad, R. (2010). Aparat Hukum dan Pembenaran Kekerasan. Unisia, (61), 304-316.

Nugroho, S. A., & SH, M. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Prenada Media.

Pangestuti, E. (2017). Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Dan Korban. Yustitiabelen, 3(1), 1-23.

Redelmeier, D. A., Tibshirani, R. J., & Evans, L. (2003). Traffic-law enforcement and risk of death from motor-vehicle crashes: case-crossover study. The Lancet, 361(9376), 2177-2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13770-1

Retting, R. A., & Williams, A. F. (1996). Characteristics of red light violators: Results of a field investigation. Journal of Safety Research, 27(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(95)00026-7

Rili Anita, A. (2016). Upaya Kepolisian Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Bagi Korban Tabrak Lari (Doctoral dissertation, UAJY).

Setiadi, H. E., & SH, M. (2017). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Shaaban, K., & Pande, A. (2018). Evaluation of red-light camera enforcement using traffic violations. Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (English edition), 5(1), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2017.04.005

Soekanto, S. (2012). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. cetakan ketiga. Jakarta.

Suparman, M. (2011). Robohnya Keadilan, Politik Hukum Dan HAM Era Reformasi.

Terina, T., & Rachman, F. (2020). Konsep Pemidanaan Dari Kacamata Hukum Penitensier. ISMAYA PUBLISHING.

Waluyo, B. (2020). Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Watson, B., Watson, A., Siskind, V., Fleiter, J., & Soole, D. (2015). Profiling high-range speeding offenders: Investigating criminal history, personal characteristics, traffic offences, and crash history. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.013

Wicaksana, B. A., Hartanto, S. H., Marisa Kurnianingsih, S. H., & MH, M. K. (2016). Proses Penanganan Perkara Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Mengakibatkan Matinya Seseorang di Kabupaten Klaten (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Yagil, D. (1998). Gender and age-related differences in attitudes toward traffic laws and traffic violations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00010-2

Yusnita, L. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas. Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum: Universitas Hasanuddin, Makasar.