Dry matter digestibility, organic matter and digestibility in vitro of setaria grass at types and different dosage of fertilizers

I Nyoman Kaca; Yan Tonga; Luh Suariani; I Gusti Agus Maha Putra Sanjaya; Ni Made Yudiastari; Ni Ketut Etty Suwitari

doi:10.29332/ijls.v5n3.1530

Authors

I Nyoman Kaca Animal Husbandry Department, Agriculture Faculty, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
Yan Tonga Animal Husbandry Department, Agriculture Faculty, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
Luh Suariani Animal Husbandry Department, Agriculture Faculty, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Gusti Agus Maha Putra Sanjaya
iga.sanjaya@gmail.com
Animal Husbandry Department, Agriculture Faculty, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
Ni Made Yudiastari Animal Husbandry Department, Agriculture Faculty, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
Ni Ketut Etty Suwitari Animal Husbandry Department, Agriculture Faculty, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

dry matter digestibility, fertilizer, in vitro digestibility, organic matter digestibility, Setaria

Abstract

A study was conducted to can you buy soma online legally determine the digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and digestibility of the Setaria grass invitro at different types and dosages of fertilizers. This research was conducted in the experimental garden of the Faculty of Agriculture, Warmadewa University, which is located at Jalan Terompong Number 24 Tanjung Bungkak Denpasar Bali from May 29, 2020 to July 18, 2020. The analysis of dry matter and organic matter digestibility and in vitro digestibility was carried out at the Animal Nutrition and Forage Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Udayana University from July to August 2020. This study used a randomized block design (RAK) with a 2 x 4 factorial pattern. Factor A was 2 types of manure, and factor B had 4 levels of fertilizer. Factor A, namely: S = manure from cow, K = manure from goat. The dosages used are: D0 = without fertilizer (0 ton/ha), D1 = 10 ton/ha, D2 = 20 ton/ha, and D3 = 30 ton/ha. The variables observed were: dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, and buy soma online cheap in vitro digestibility of Setaria grass grown at different types and doses of manure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aganga, A. A., & Mosase, K. W. (2001). Tannin content, nutritive value and dry matter digestibility of Lonchocarpus capassa, Zizyphus mucronata, Sclerocarya birrea, Kirkia acuminata and Rhus lancea seeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 91(1-2), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00235-8

Barber, G. D., Givens, D. I., Kridis, M. S., Offer, N. W., & Murray, I. (1990). Prediction of the organic matter digestibility of grass silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 28(1-2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(90)90074-I

Bogale, A., & Tesfaye, K. (2011). Relationship between Kernell ash content, water use efficiency and yield in Durum Wheat under water deficit induced at different growth stages. Afr J Basic Appl Sci, 3, 80-86.

Hassen, A., Rethman, N. F. G., Van Niekerk, W. A., & Tjelele, T. J. (2007). Influence of season/year and species on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of five Indigofera accessions. Animal feed science and technology, 136(3-4), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.09.010

Ismail, R. (2011). Kecernaan in vitro.

Kapoor, R., Giri, B., & Mukerji, K. G. (2004). Improved growth and essential oil yield and quality in Foeniculum vulgare mill on mycorrhizal inoculation supplemented with P-fertilizer. Bioresource technology, 93(3), 307-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.028

Ladd, J. N., Amato, M., Zhou, L. K., & Schultz, J. E. (1994). Differential effects of rotation, plant residue and nitrogen fertilizer on microbial biomass and organic matter in an Australian Alfisol. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26(7), 821-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90298-4

Mansyur, M., Djuned, H., Dhalika, T., Hardjosoewignyo, S., & Abdullah, L. (2005). Pengaruh interval pemotongan dan invasi gulma Chromolaena odorata terhadap produksi dan kualitas rumput Brachiaria Humidicola. Media Peternakan, 28(2), 161629.

Marpaung, A. E., Karo, B. B., & Barus, S. (2018). Respon Beberapa Jenis Kompos Dan Poc Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Hasil Kubis. Jurnal Agroteknosains, 2(2).

McLeod, M. N., & Minson, D. J. (1978). The accuracy of the pepsin-cellulase technique for estimating the dry matter digestibility in vivo of grasses and legumes. Animal feed science and technology, 3(4), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(78)90002-0

Muir, J. P., Taylor, J., & Interrante, S. M. (2005). Herbage and seed from Texan native perennial herbaceous legumes. Rangeland ecology & management, 58(6), 643-651. https://doi.org/10.2111/04-047.1

Noblet, J., & Jaguelin-Peyraud, Y. (2007). Prediction of digestibility of organic matter and energy in the growing pig from an in vitro method. Animal feed science and technology, 134(3-4), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.008

Nyanjang, R., Salim, A. A., & Rahmiati, Y. (2003). Penggunaan pupuk majemuk NPK 25-7-7 terhadap peningkatan produksi mutu pada tanaman teh menghasilkan di tanah andisols. PT. Perkebunan Nusantara XII. PT. Perkebunan Nusantara XII Prosiding Teh.

Prasetya, M. E. (2014). Pengaruh pupuk NPK mutiara dan pupuk kandang sapi terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman cabai merah keriting varietas arimbi (Capsicum annuum L.). Agrifor: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian dan Kehutanan, 13(2), 191-198.

Purbajanti, E. D., Soetrisno, D., Hanudin, E., & Budi, S. P. S. (2007). Karakteristik lima jenis rumput pakan pada berbagai tingkat salinitas. Jurnal Pengembangan Peternakan Tropis, 32(3), 186-193.

Rosmarkam, A., & Yuwono, N. W. (2002). Ilmu kesuburan tanah.

Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1995). Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika: Suatu Pendekatan Biometrik Cetakan ke-4. PT Gramedia P ustaka U tama, J akarta.(Diterjemahkan oleh B. Sumantri).

Sulaiman, W. A., Dwatmadji, D., & Suteky, T. (2018). Pengaruh Pemberian Pupuk Feses Sapi dengan Dosis yang Berbeda Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Rumput Odot (Pennisetum purpureum Cv. Mott) di Kabupaten Kepahiang. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 13(4), 365-376.

Sutardi, T. (1980). Landasan ilmu nutrisi. Jilid I. departemen Ilmu Makanan Ternak. Fakultas Peternakan. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, D. R. (1963). A two?stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and forage science, 18(2), 104-111.

Tillman, A. D., Hartadi, H., Reksohadiprodjo, S., Prawirokusumo, S., & Lebdosoekojo, S. (1998). Ilmu makanan ternak dasar.

Tonga, Y., Kaca, I. N., Suariani, L., Sutapa, I. G., Yudiastari, N. M., & Suwitari, N. K. E. (2017). The production and quality of mott grass (pennisetum purpureum CV. Mott) that intercropped with legume in the first pruning. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 3(4), 88-101.

Wang, X. S., Tang, C. H., Yang, X. Q., & Gao, W. R. (2008). Characterization, amino acid composition and in vitro digestibility of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) proteins. Food Chemistry, 107(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.06.064

Zhao, C. X., He, M. R., Wang, Z. L., Wang, Y. F., & Lin, Q. (2009). Effects of different water availability at post-anthesis stage on grain nutrition and quality in strong-gluten winter wheat. Comptes rendus biologies, 332(8), 759-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.03.003