Formative evaluation and its impact on learning in private education
Keywords:
Academic performance, Private, Education, Formative evaluation, Teaching - learning processAbstract
The research aimed to analyze the application of formative evaluation and its impact on student learning in a particular educational unit in the city of Manta. The analytical and synthetic method was applied with the qualitative-quantitative approach, for this, the data was collected through the technique of the teacher survey, the students' report card was used to identify the evaluation process that was carried out. The results were compared with the bibliographic research carried out in several repositories that showed that the institution applies formative evaluation in a pertinent way, obtaining the advantages that this evaluation system supposes for students and teachers, which influenced the educational system by putting in Practice flexibility in the curriculum. The formative assessment improved the teaching-learning strategies in the classroom.
Downloads
References
Aguirre-Gamboa, R., Gomez-Rueda, H., Martínez-Ledesma, E., Martínez-Torteya, A., Chacolla-Huaringa, R., Rodriguez-Barrientos, A., ... & Trevino, V. (2013). SurvExpress: an online biomarker validation tool and database for cancer gene expression data using survival analysis. PloS one, 8(9), e74250.
Arroyo, E., & Zambrano, L. (2020). The formative evaluation and its contribution to the academic performance of the students. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(11), 2590-2598.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Barcia, J., & Carvajal, T. (2015). The teaching-learning process in education. Electronic Magazine Training and Educational Quality (REFCalE), 3(3), 139-154.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of research in personality, 37(4), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0
Contento, I. R., Koch, P. A., Lee, H., Sauberli, W., & Calabrese-Barton, A. (2007). Enhancing personal agency and competence in eating and moving: Formative evaluation of a middle school curriculum—Choice, control, and change. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 39(5), S179-S186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2007.02.006
Edel, N. (2003). Academic Performance: Concept, Research and Development. REICE - Ibero-American Electronic Magazine on Quality, Efficacy and Change in Education, 1(2), 12-16.
Gómez, L. (2010). Un espacio para la investigación documental. Revista Vanguardia Psicológica Clínica Teórica y Práctica, 1(2), 226-233.
Gómez, M., & Grau, S. (2010). Assessment of Learning in the European Higher Education Area. Alicante, Spain: Editorial Marfil, SA
González, L. (2002). University academic performance. associated psychological variables, 32-55.
Guido, P., & Alvarez, F. (2013). The Formative Evaluation and its Incidence in the Development of the Procedural and Attitudinal Cognitive Achievements in the High School Students of the National School Pasa Ciudad de Ambato Province of Tungurahua. Technical University of Ambato, 162.
Isaza, L. (2014). Learning Styles: a commitment to the academic performance of students in Higher Education. . Encounters, 12(2), 25-34.
Kordaki, M. (2010). A drawing and multi-representational computer environment for beginners’ learning of programming using C: Design and pilot formative evaluation. Computers & Education, 54(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.012
Lago González, D., & Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P. (2019). Detection of geothermal potential zones using remote sensing techniques. Remote Sensing, 11(20), 2403.
Maba, W. (2017). The implementation of education national standard in the instrument of school accreditation of Bali province education authority. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 3(4), 1-7.
Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005
Martínez, J. F., Borko, H., Stecher, B., Luskin, R., & Kloser, M. (2012). Measuring classroom assessment practice using instructional artifacts: A validation study of the QAS notebook. Educational Assessment, 17(2-3), 107-131..
Meneses, G. (2007). The teaching-learning process: the didactic act. NTIC, 32-64.
Peter, V. F. (2015). Relationship among culture, education and sports. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 2(11), 38-42.
Popham, W. J. (2013). On Serving Two Masters: Formative and Summative Teacher Evaluation. Principal leadership, 13(7), 18-22.
Protti Coto, M., Cannon Díaz, B. Y., & Heredia Escorza, Y. (2017). Development of Pre-Reading Skills Using iPad and SMARTBoard Technologies.
Queija, M. L., González, M. A., & González, J. R. (2019). Upgrading of professional pedagogical improvement of professors for formative evaluation. Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior, 33(1), 1-18.
Rampersaud, G. C., Pereira, M. A., Girard, B. L., Adams, J., & Metzl, J. D. (2005). Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic performance in children and adolescents. Journal of the american dietetic association, 105(5), 743-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.007
Rao, R. V., & Kalyankar, V. D. (2013). Parameter optimization of modern machining processes using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(1), 524-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.06.007
Reynolds, M., & Trehan, K. (2000). Assessment: a critical perspective. Studies in higher education, 25(3), 267-278.
Riera-Ledesma, J., & Salazar-González, J. J. (2013). A column generation approach for a school bus routing problem with resource constraints. Computers & Operations Research, 40(2), 566-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.08.011
Rosado, M. (2000). Teaching-learning, process or myth? Iztapalapa. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 48, 247-260.
Saltos-Dueñas, CML, & Chiriboga-Zambrano, MJ (2016). Formative evaluation of student performance. Science Mastery , 2 (4), 112-127.
Sánchez, V., & Llinares, S. (2003). Four student teachers' pedagogical reasoning on functions. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 6(1), 5-25.
Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers' assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585-609.
Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 41(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00031-9
Zambrano, G., & Vigueras, J. (2020). Family role in the teaching-learning process. Science Mastery(6), 448-473.
Zaragoza Casterad, J., Carlos Luis-Pascual, J., & Manrique Arribas, J. C. (2009). Innovation experiences in Higher Education: results in the implementation of formative assessment systems. REDU-REVISTA DE DOCENCIA UNIVERSITARIA, 7(4).
Zaragoza Casterad, J., Luis-Pascual, JC, & Manrique Arribas, JC (2009). Global results of 29 innovation experiences in university teaching with formative evaluation systems. University Teaching Magazine , 4 .
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of social sciences and humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJSSH right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJSSH can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJSSH volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
