Legal pluralism politics towards recognition of social unity in customary law and local regulation

  • Gede Marhaendra Wija Atmaja Udayana University, Indonesia
Keywords: Customary law, Legal pluralism politics, Social unity recognition, Local regulation, Regulation


The present study at discussing the about Legal Pluralism Politics towards Recognition of the Society Unity of Customary Law and Local Regulations. The two important term was discussed i.e. (1) the political principles of the legal pluralism whether as the recognition direction for the social unity of the customary law; (2) the rationale for the need to recognize the social unity of the customary law with a local regulation. The customary law unity has a specificity that requires flexible regulation in the law, and enforcement to its acknowledgment with local regulations. The utilization wonder, the law can make people happy by ensuring access to their rights. The recognition of customary law unity society guarantees access to rights, in accordance with laws that mandate acknowledgment with local regulations. The legal certainty requires that the law can be formulated, unlike a clear and systematic way. It can be made thus, it is clear about the recognized identity is given for more limited scope and local government to be better recognize local uniqueness.


Download data is not yet available.


Bedner, A. (2010). An elementary approach to the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2(1), 48-74.

Black, H. C., Garner, B. A., & McDaniel, B. R. (1999). Black's law dictionary (Vol. 196). St. Paul, MN: West Group.

Bourchier, D., & Hadiz, V. (Eds.). (2014). Indonesian politics and society: A reader. Routledge.

Cindawati. (2011). The Principle of Balance in International Business Contract Law (in Anticipation of the Free Trade Era). Indonesian J. Int'l L., 9, 491.

Dicey, A. V., & Wade, E. C. S. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (Vol. 10). London: Macmillan.

Lask, E., Radbruch, G., Dabin, J., & Wilk, K. (1950). The legal philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin.

Leyh, G. (2011). Pendidikan Hukum dan Kehidupan Publik.

Li, T. M. (1999). Compromising power: Development, culture, and rule in Indonesia. Cultural anthropology, 14(3), 295-322.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1988). Etika politik: prinsip-prinsip moral dasar kenegaraan modern. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Manan, B. (1990). Relationship Between Central and Regional According to the principle of decentralization by 1945.

Nahak, S. (2017). Criminal Law Policy on Land Functions Impacting Climate Change in Indonesian National Law Perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(3), 28-39.

Rahman, H. A. (2011). Public involvement on environmental issues in Malaysia with reference to Alor Star, Kedah. In 2011 International Conference on Environmental, Biomedical and Biotechnology IPCBEE, Singapore (Vol. 16).

Saptomo, A. (2010). Hukum dan kearifan lokal: revitalisasi hukum adat Nusantara. Grasindo.

Sholahuddin, A., & Sadhana, K. (2018). Policy implementation of nazhir endowments. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research (IRJEIS), 4(2), 63-72.

Suarta, I. M. (2017). Revitalization of Oral Literature Tradition of Balinese Society Based Character Values As Deradicalism Effort. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(3), 8-16.

Suroto, S., & MacAndrews, C. (1978). Bibliografi beranotasi perihal tanah di Indonesia: oleh Soeri Soeroto [dan] Colin MacAndrews. Lembaga Studi Pedesaan dan Kawasan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Vuji, V. (2006). Bhikhu Parekh: Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Politi?ka misao: ?asopis za politologiju, 42(4), 133-137.

How to Cite
Atmaja, G. M. W. (2018). Legal pluralism politics towards recognition of social unity in customary law and local regulation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 124-140.