The urgency of developing the capacity building on Saniri institution
Keywords:
capacity building, performance, infrastructure, state Saniri, traditional institutionsAbstract
The Government of Hunut Village, Baguala District, Ambon City has built several state saniri units as traditional institutions on customary lands with their main tasks and functions. The type of research used is qualitative research with descriptive elaboration. Furthermore, this research will be conducted in Mamala State, Leihitu District, Central Maluku Regency. Interviews in this study were conducted by asking informants or informants, namely the Mamala State Saniri, Mamala State Government Employees, Soa Heads, Community Leaders, and Traditional Leaders. Strategy for strengthening the capacity of sanitation institutions in Mamala Country. The results obtained are that in carrying out the duties and functions of the State, Saniri has not been maximized. The reason is, the senior has only been carrying out its duties and functions for approximately seven months. The factors that affect the performance of Saniri are the human resources factor of the Saniri institution itself and the unavailability of facilities and infrastructure to support the work of the Sansiri institution.
Downloads
References
Antin, T. M., Constantine, N. A., & Hunt, G. (2015). Conflicting discourses in qualitative research: The search for divergent data within cases. Field Methods, 27(3), 211-222.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Biitir, S. B., Nara, B. B., & Ameyaw, S. (2017). Integrating decentralised land administration systems with traditional land governance institutions in Ghana: Policy and praxis. Land use policy, 68, 402-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.007
Cramb, R. A., & Wills, I. R. (1990). The role of traditional institutions in rural development: community-based land tenure and government land policy in Sarawak, Malaysia. World Development, 18(3), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(90)90122-E
Geiling, J., Burkle Jr, F. M., Amundson, D., Dominguez-Cherit, G., Gomersall, C. D., Lim, M. L., ... & Task Force for Mass Critical Care. (2014). Resource-Poor Settings: Infrastructure and Capacity Building. Chest, 146(4), e156S-e167S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0744
Herizal, H., Mukhrijal, M., & Wance, M. (2020). Pendekatan akuntabilitas pelayanan publik dalam mengikuti perubahan paradigma baru administrasi publik. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 1(1).
Ika, L. A., & Donnelly, J. (2017). Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.005
Kaliky, P. I. ., Wance, M. ., & Matdoan, M. Y. . (2020). The reality of government communication in hitu lama negeri development planning, Central Maluku Regency . International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(6), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n6.1031
La Suhu, B., & Wance, M. (2019). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Petani Rumput Laut Di Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan (Studi Desa Mano Kecamatan Obi Selatan). JOURNAL OF GOVERNMENT (Kajian Manajemen Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah), 4(2), 156-172.
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems, 54(1), 11-22.
Merino, S. S., & de los Ríos Carmenado, I. (2012). Capacity building in development projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.231
Millar, P., & Doherty, A. (2016). Capacity building in nonprofit sport organizations: Development of a process model. Sport management review, 19(4), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.01.002
Moenir, A. S. (2008). Manajemen pelayanan umum di Indonesia.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metode penelitian kualitatif.
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative health research, 25(9), 1212-1222.
Percy, W. H., Kostere, K., & Kostere, S. (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. The qualitative report, 20(2), 76-85.
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative health research, 28(3), 381-388.
Poudel, D. P. (2019). Migration, forest management and traditional institutions: Acceptance of and resistance to community forestry models in Nepal. Geoforum, 106, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.09.003
Riyadi, B., & Bratakusumah, S. (2005). Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Suacana, I. W. G., & Suaib, E. (2016). Democracy model based on Bali local wisdom values for capacity building of regional governance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(9), 27-36. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/411
Tuanaya, W., Tuhumury, J. J., & Wance, M. (2020). Management Model And Village Fund Allocation During Pandemic Covid-19 In Waiheru Village Ambon Cityindonesia. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 13357-13369.
Wance, M., Muhtar, M., & Kaliky, P. I. (2020). PKM Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Negeri Hila Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. CARADDE: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 229-338.
Wickham, J. D., Riitters, K. H., Wade, T. G., & Vogt, P. (2010). A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3-4), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.003
Ziphorah, R. M. (2014). Information and communication technology integration: Where to start, infrastructure or capacity building?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3649-3658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.818
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of social sciences and humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJSSH right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJSSH can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJSSH volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
