Evaluation process of multiple intelligence in collegiate
Keywords:
academic performance, evaluation, multiple intelligences, students, teaching-learningAbstract
The research focused on the evaluation process of the multiple intelligences of the schoolchildren, for which an Educational institution of the Urban sector of the Manabí province of the Portoviejo canton was chosen, determining the influence of these intelligences in the teaching-learning processes, for which a survey was applied with a sample of 22 teachers. The results obtained indicated, that teachers have little knowledge of multiple intelligences, do not consider them for their classes. Handle the theory and although they consider it important, they do not use it in their strategies, nor do they model them in their classes, they always use the same strategy and the same means according to the content regardless of the characteristics of the student. This article defines that with a diagnosis a new proposal of optional courses, workshops and creditable extension activities related to the Multiple Intelligence Theory can be generated; strategies for their identification and use within the classroom, how to organize learning environments enriched with tactics, and means to promote their motivation and interest in training.
Downloads
References
Akbari, R., & Hosseini, K. (2008). Multiple intelligences and language learning strategies: Investigating possible relations. System, 36(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.008
Aliaga, J. (2012). Multiple Intelligences: Evaluation and relationship with the performance in mathematics in students of the fifth year of high school in Metropolitan Lima. Magazine IIPSI Faculty of Psychology UNMSM, 15, 163-202.
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple Intelligences: Seven Ways to Approach Curriculum. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 26-28.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (2003). The heirs. (M. Mayer, Trad.) Buenos Aires: XXI Century, Editores Argentinos SA
Brown, R. (2015). Authentic evaluation: The use of evaluation to help students learn. RELIEF, 21(2), 1-10.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and individual differences, 44(7), 1596-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003
Chamoso, J. M., Cáceres, M. J., & Azcárate, P. (2012). Reflection on the teaching-learning process in the initial training of teachers. Characterization of the issues on which pre-service mathematics teachers reflect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.003
Chilin, G., & Herrera, I. (2018-2019). Study of the multiple intelligences in the students of first, second and third of the Unified General Baccalaureate of the morning and evening of the Educational Unit La Maná, of the canton La Maná, in the period 2018-2019. Central University of Ecuador, La Maná.
Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of research in personality, 40(3), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.003
Covarrubias, P., & Piña, MM (2004). The teacher-student interaction and its relationship with learning. Latin American Journal of Educational Studies (Mexico), 34(1), 47-84.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and individual differences, 36(8), 1907-1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.020
Fernandez, A., & Mihura de Rosa, D. (2015). Multiple intelligences. E-motion(4), 6-17.
Forteza, J. (1975). Instrumental model of the relationships between motivational variables and performance. Journal of General and Applied Psychology, 30(132), 75-91.
Garder, H. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the 19th century. Barcelona: Paidos.
Gardner, H. (2016). Structure of the Mind (Vol. 3). New York: BasicBook.
Government of the Canary Islands. (2015). Evaluation of the teaching-learning process in vocational training for employment. Spain: Atlas Systems.
Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018
Gutiérrez, M. (2018). Learning styles, teaching strategies. Pedagogical Trends(31), 83-96.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Investigation methodology. Mexico: McGRAW-HILL.
K?rkgöz, Y. (2010). Catering for multiple intelligences in locally-published ELT textbooks in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 127-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.023
Kraker, M. J. (2000). Classroom discourse: Teaching, learning, and learning disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(3), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00063-3
Kuo, C. C., Maker, J., Su, F. L., & Hu, C. (2010). Identifying young gifted children and cultivating problem solving abilities and multiple intelligences. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.005
Lens, W., Matos, L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2008). The teacher as a source of motivation for students: Talking about what and why of learning. Digital Journal of Research in University Teaching, 4(1), 6-7.
Maccario, B. (1989). Theory and practice of the evaluation of physical and sports activities. Buenos Aires: Ed. Lidium.
Macías, EIP, Cedeño, HAC, & Chávez, GMR (2018). Importance of Improving Resilience in Teaching-Learning Process of Students with Disabilities. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences , 5 (2), 120-128.
Morris, C., & Maisto, A. (2009). Psychology. CDMX: Perarson Education, 6, 311.
Petrides, K. V., Frederickson, N., & Furnham, A. (2004). The role of trait emotional intelligence in academic performance and deviant behavior at school. Personality and individual differences, 36(2), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00084-9
Zaragoza, C., Pascual, L., & Arribas, M. (2009). Experiences in innovation in university teaching: results of the application of formative evaluation systems. University teaching magazine (4), 1-33.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Articles published in the International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJSSH right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJSSH can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJSSH volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
