The bureaucratic political relation model in perception of officers public

A study on bima city government

https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v4n3.473

Authors

  • Tauhid Tauhid Mbojo College of Social and Political Sciences, Mande Village, Bima City, Indonesia
  • Mukhlis Ishaka Mbojo College of Social and Political Sciences, Mande Village, Bima City, Indonesia
  • Kamaluddin Kamaluddin Mbojo College of Social and Political Sciences, Mande Village, Bima City, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Taufiq Mbojo College of Social and Political Sciences, Mande Village, Bima City, Indonesia

Keywords:

administration, bureaucratic, policymakers, political relation, public officials

Abstract

The relationship between politics and bureaucracy is significant to observe because this concerns the interests of policymakers and stakeholders related to the politics of local government policies. In this regard, this study aims to describe the Political Relations Model Bureaucracy in the Perception of Public Officials (A Study at the Bima City Government). The approach in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results showed that the Relationship Model Bureaucratic Politics in the Perception of Public Officials (A Study at the Bima City Government) have interrelated and mutually supportive relationships both in formulating, implement and evaluate policies both political and administration towards the implementation of the public bureaucracy in the Bima City Government. Perception public officials concerning political intervention in carrying out activities bureaucracy are reflected in the process of development, administration, and technique as well as transfer and high employee rotation, institutional restructuring of the Bima City government bureaucracy as well The formulation of the Kota Bima Regional Financial Budgeting always occurs for political intervention interests of both public officials and career officials in running the wheel the government in the city of Bima.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Althoff, M. R. P., & Rush, M. (2015). Pengantar Sosiologi Politik, terj. Kartini Kartono. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Aslan, A. (2019). Pergeseran Nilai Di Masyarakat Perbatasan (Studi tentang Pendidikan dan Perubahan Sosial di Desa Temajuk Kalimantan Barat).

Batubara, C., Samosir, O., & Hargens, B. (2008). Panjangnya jalan politik. Jala.

Beest, F. V., Braam, G. J. M., & Boelens, S. (2009). Quality of Financial Reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics.

Beetsma, R. M., & Bovenberg, A. L. (1998). Monetary union without fiscal coordination may discipline policymakers. Journal of international economics, 45(2), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00031-2

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights. MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Brainard, S. L., & Martimort, D. (1997). Strategic trade policy with incompletely informed policymakers. Journal of International Economics, 42(1-2), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01446-8

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Lima, K. G., Krause, G. C., da Silva, E. F. G., Xavier, L. L., Martins, L. A. M., Alice, L. M., ... & Garcia, M. C. R. (2018). Octyl gallate reduces ATP levels and Ki67 expression leading HepG2 cells to cell cycle arrest and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. Toxicology in Vitro, 48, 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.12.017

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Murrin, L. C., Ferrer, J. R., Wanyun, Z., & Haley, N. J. (1987). Nicotine administration to rats: methodological considerations. Life sciences, 40(17), 1699-1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(87)90020-8

Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of public economics, 75(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4

Sedarmayanti, S. (2004). Birokrasi dan Peran Kaum Perempuan. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 1(1), 76-87.

Sopandi, D. (2019). The expenditure process of the state budget (APBN) funds with the state treasury and budget (SPAN) system in the perspective of bureaucratic reform. International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research, 5(6), 12-17.

Tantik, E., & Anderl, R. (2017). Integrated data model and structure for the asset administration shell in industrie 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 60, 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.048

Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 631-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007

Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2015). Politisasi Birokrasi: Pola Hubungan Politik dan Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 3(1), 10-28.

Published

2020-11-23

How to Cite

Tauhid, T., Ishaka, M. ., Kamaluddin, K. ., & Taufiq, M. . (2020). The bureaucratic political relation model in perception of officers public: A study on bima city government. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v4n3.473

Issue

Section

Research Articles