Evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants at different time periods in mandibular implant overdenture patients: One year follow up (original research) study

Deepti Raghav

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.10117

Authors

Deepti Raghav
drdeeptiraghav@gmail.com
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and Research Centre, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

cone beam computed tomography, bone loss, implant, overdenture, prosthodontics

Abstract

Background and Aim: Crestal bone loss around dental implants is an inadvertent phenomenon. Many clinical measures have been proposed for this dilemma. This study was conducted to evaluate the crestal bone loss around implants at different time periods in mandibular implant overdenture patients. The study was completed in one year follow up timing. Materials & Methods: Total 15 patients were selected for implant overdenture rehabilitation therapy including male and female patients. Complete dentures were fabricated by standard manner and delivered. Two implants were placed in each patient bilaterally. Group I consist of the implants placed in the right side of mandible while and Group II consist of implants placed in the left side of mandible. The mesial, distal, buccal and lingual bone level around the dental implants was evaluated in detail by advanced radiographic technique CBCT. These CBCT assessments were performed after 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months timings. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant (p< 0.05). Statistical Analysis and Results: Statistical analysis was conducted by using statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P & Eriksson R. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11–25.

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson RA. The long‑term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11‑25.

Al‑Thobity AM, Kutkut A, Almas K. Microthreaded implants and crestal bone loss: A systematic review. J Oral Implantol 2017;8:157‑66.

Aparna IN, Dhanasekar B, Lingeshwar D, Gupta L. Implant crest module: A review of biomechanical considerations. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:257‑63.

Aprianto, D. R., Parenrengi, M. A., Utomo, B., Fauzi, A. A., & Subagyo, E. A. (2022). Autograft and implant cranioplasty in pediatric patients. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1852

Barone A, Orlando B, Cingano L, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Covani U. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non‑augmented extraction sockets: 3‑year results. J Periodontol 2012;83:836‑46.

Deeb G, Antonos L, Tack S, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG. Is cone-beam computed tomography always necessary for dental implant placement? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:285-9.

Friberg B, Jemt T. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one‑stage surgery: A 1‑year retrospective study of 90 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:47‑54.

Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to autogenous bone graft efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995;3:1‑8.

Goswami MM. Comparison of crestal bone loss along two implant crest module designs. MJAFI 2009;65:319‑22.

Jovanovic SA. Diagnosis and treatment of peri implant complications. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA, editors. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003. p. 931‑42.

Kon E, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Marcacci M. Platelet‑rich plasma (PRP) to treat sports injuries: Evidence to support its use. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:516‑27.

Lieberman JR, Daluiski A, Einhorn TA. The role of growth factors in the repair of bone. Biology and clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1032‑44.

Marx RE, Carlson ER, Eichstaedt RM, Schimmele SR, Strauss JE, Georgeff KR. Platelet‑rich plasma: Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:638‑46.

Misch, CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3th ed, CV. Mosby Co., St. Louis, Boston, Chicago, London, Philadelphia, Sydney, Toronto, 2008.

Quoc JB, Vang A, Evrard L. Peri‑implant bone loss at implants placed in preserved alveolar bone versus implants placed in native bone: A retrospective radiographic study. Open Dent J 2018;12:529‑45.

Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Branemark System TiUnite and machined‑surface implants in the posterior mandible: A randomized open‑ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:57‑63.

Roffi A, Filardo G, Kon E, Marcacci M. Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:330.

Tschon M, Fini M, Giardino R, Filardo G, Dallari D, Torricelli P, et al. Lights and shadows concerning platelet products for musculoskeletal regeneration. Front Biosci 2011;3:96‑107.

Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with porous coating: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:351‑9.

Villaca-Carvalho MF, Manhaes LR Jr, de Moraes ME, Lopes SL. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20:289-94.

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Wiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surface: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:429‑44.