Midshaft diameter of humerus and its accuracy in sex determination of south Indian population

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.10127

Authors

  • K. Praveena Kumari Research Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai-600073
  • C. S. Janaki Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bharath Medical College, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai-600073
  • S. Lokanadham Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Santhiram Medical College, Nandyal, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh - 518501

Keywords:

humerus, shaft, sex determination

Abstract

Background: Humerus is one of the long bones generally favoured in osteometric studies as it appears to yield highest level of classification accuracy in sex determination. Aim: To study the midshaft diameter of humerus and its accuracy factor in sex determination. Methods: A total of 100 (Male - 72, Female - 28) dry human humeri were collected from the Department of Anatomy as well as from the under graduate students of Santhiram Medical College, Nandyal. The maximum midshaft diameter of humerus was measured from absolute greatest diameter without regard to the vertical or transverse plane. The minimum midshaft diameter of humerus was measured from absolute least diameter in the middle without regard to any plane or maximum diameter Results: The mean maximum mid shaft diameter of humerus in male bones was 1.953±0.027 and in female bones was 1.75±0.030. The mean minimum midshaft diameter of humerus in male was 1.657±0.0211 and in female was 1.485±0.026 in the present study Conclusion: The mid shaft diameter can be considered as one of the sex determinations factors due to its higher accuracy in males than females with other predictive variables of humerus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abo Samak A.M, El-Hanafy M.M.A, Attia M.M, Mishriki E.S. Identification of sex from Patella in Egyptians. Mansoura J. Forensic Med. Clin. Toxicol. VII (2). 1999; 43-55.

Akman, S¸. D.; Karakas, P. & Bozkir, M. G. The morphometric measurements of humerus segments. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2006; 36(2):81-5.

Albanese J, Cardoso H.F.V, Saunders S.R. Universal methodology for developing univariate sample & specific sex determination methods: an example using the epicondylar breadth of the humerus. J Arch Sci. 2005; 32:143–152.

Anudeep Singh, Mahindra Nagar, and Anil Kumar. An Anthropometric Study of the Humerus in Adults. RRJMHS.2014;3(3):77-82.

Atamtürk D. Estimation of sex from the dimensions of foot, foot prints, and shoe. Anthrop Anz.2010; 68:21-29.

Duyar İ, Özener B. Çocuk işçiler: çarpık gelişen bedenler. Ankara: Utopya.2003.

Duyar İ. Growth patterns and physical plasticity in adolescent laborers. Coll Antropol.2008; 32:403-412.

Girish patil, Sanjeev Kolagi, Umesh Ramadurg. Sexual dimorphism in the Humerus: A study on South Indians. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011.5(3):538-541.

Iscan M.Y, Loth S.R, King C.A, Shihai D, Yoshino M. Sexual dimorphism in the humerus: a comparative analysis of Chinese, Japanese and Thai.For.sci.inter. 1998; 98(1):17-29.

Knight B. Forensic Pathology. Edward Arnold, Division of Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1997: 95-132.

Mall, G.; Hubig, M.; Büttner, A.; Kuznik, J.; Penning, R. & Graw,M. Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. Forensic Sci. Int.2001; 117(1-2):23-30.

Polochocki JH. Bilateral variation in limb articular surface dimensions. Am J Hum Biol. 2004; 16(3); 328-33.

Sembiring, S. M. B. (2021). The effectiveness of buzz group disscussionon knowledge and attitudes about prannal sex in adolescents at vocational school of pencawan medan. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(1), 56-60. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v4n1.775

Seo Y, Uchiyama T, Shimizu K, Takahama K. Identification of remains by sequencing of mitochondrial DNA control region. The Am. J. for. Med. Pathol. 2000; 20(3):138-143.

Sing S, Singh G,Singh P. Identification of sex from Ulna.Indian J Med Res.1974;62(5):731-735.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

Williams, P. L.; Warwick, R.; Dyson, M. & Bannister, L. H. The humerus. In: Gray’s anatomy. 37th Ed. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1989. p.406.

Wright LE, Vasquez MA. Estimation the length of incomplete long bones: Forensic standards from Guatemala. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;120: 233- 251.

Wu L. Sex discriminant analysis of long bones of upper limb. Acta Anthropol. Sinica (Chinese with English abstract), 1989; 8:231-239.

Published

02-07-2022

How to Cite

Kumari, K. P., Janaki, C. S., & Lokanadham, S. (2022). Midshaft diameter of humerus and its accuracy in sex determination of south Indian population. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 1577–1583. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.10127

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles