Cognizance about potential cancer risks due to cone-beam computed tomography systems among dental professionals

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.10152

Authors

  • G M Sivsri Roshan Undergraduate student, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India
  • Sindhu R Master of Dental Surgery, Senior lecturer, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India
  • Dinesh Dhamodhar Master of Dental Surgery, Reader, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India
  • Prabu D Master of Dental Surgery, Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India
  • Rajmohan M Master of Dental Surgery, Reader, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India
  • Bharathwaj V V Master of Dental Surgery, Senior lecturer, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India

Keywords:

CBCT, radiosensitivity, effective dose, carcinogenesis, seivert

Abstract

Background: There is an increase in the number of Cone Beam Computed Tomography users, and it comes to the risk of developing cancer and mutations of genes in children below 18 years of age and the foetus of pregnant women. Knowing such conditions is necessary among dentists to prevent these conditions in the future. Aim: To determine the knowledge and familiarity about Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and its side effects among dental professionals. Methodology: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study is done among 202 dentists. The results were validated using Chi-square values. In addition, the criterion-based purpose sampling technique was used to select the participants. Results: Out of 202 individuals, less than 30% were only familiar with CBCT and its side effects. The majority of the dental professionals were aware of the risk of suggesting a CBCT scan to children below 18 years (p value=0.003). Conclusion: The study result shows the lack of knowledge of CBCT and its side effects among dentists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(ACR), R., 2021. Dental Cone Beam CT. [online] Radiologyinfo.org. Available at: <https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/dentalconect%3fgoogle=amp> [Accessed 16 November 2021].

Cone Beam Computed Tomography: How safe is CBCT for your patients? [Internet]. Dentaleconomics.com. 2022 [cited 9 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.dentaleconomics.com/science-tech/article/16394714/cone-beam-computed-tomography-how-safe-is-cbct-for-your-patients

Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J. 2003;19(2):67-75. PMID: 14703331.

AI Najjar A, Colosi D, Dauer 11 Prins R, Patchell G,Branets 1, Goren AD, Faber RD. Comparison of adul And child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental Cone-beam computed tomography units. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2013;143(6):784-92.

Colceriu-Şimon IM, Băciuţ M, Ştiufiuc RI, Aghiorghiesei A, Ţărmure V, Lenghel M, Hedeşiu M, Băciuţ G. Clinical indications and radiation doses of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Medicine and pharmacy reports. 2019;92(4):346.

MacDonald D. Cone‐beam computed tomography and the dentist. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. 2017;8(1):e12178.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2021. Dental Cone-beam Computed Tomography | FDA. [online] Available at: <https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/medical-x-ray-imaging/dental-cone-beam-computed-tomography> [Accessed 15 November 2021].

Knipe, H., 2021. Cone beam CT | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. [online] Radiopaedia.org. Available at: <https://radiopaedia.org/articles/cone-beam-ct> [Accessed 16 November 2021].

Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al.; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):267–71.

Lee CY, Koval TM, Suzuki JB. Low-Dose Radiation Risks of Computerized Tomography and Cone Beam Computerized Tomography: Reducing the Fear and Controversy. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(5):e223–30.

De Felice F, Di Carlo G, Saccucci M, Tombolini V, Polimeni A. Dental cone beam computed tomography in children: clinical effectiveness and cancer risk due to radiation exposure. Oncology. 2019;96(4):173-8.

Board on Radiation Effects Research Division on Earth and Life Studies. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006.

De Felice F, Musio D, Tombolini V. Osteoradionecrosis and intensity modulated radiation therapy: an overview. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;107:39–43.

Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1010):153–60.

Isaacson KG, Thom AR, Atack NE, Horner K, Whaites E. Guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics, 4th ed. London: British Orthodontic Society; 2015.

Soh G, Loh FC, Chong YH. Radiation dosage of a dental imaging system. Quintessence International. 1993;24(3):189-191.

Ellingsen MA, Harrington GW, Hollender LG, Odont D. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation. Journal of Endodontics. 1995;21(6):326-31.

Issrani R, Prabhu N, Sghaireen M, Alshubrmi HR, Alanazi AM, Alkhalaf ZA, Alnusayri MO, Aljohani FM, Khan ZA. Comparison of Digital OPG and CBCT in Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Inferior Nerve Injury during Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. Diagnostics. 2021;11(12):2282.

De Grauwe A, Ayaz I, Shujaat S, Dimitrov S, Gbadegbegnon L, Vande Vannet B, Jacobs R. CBCT in orthodontics: a systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment. European journal of orthodontics. 2019;41(4):381-9.

Rahma, D. Y., & Atmaja, M. H. S. (2022). Peritoneal carcinomatosis and mimicking on CT scan findings. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1864

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864

Published

02-07-2022

How to Cite

Roshan, G. M. S., Sindhu, R., Dhamodhar, D., Prabu, D., Rajmohan, M., & Bharathwaj, V. V. (2022). Cognizance about potential cancer risks due to cone-beam computed tomography systems among dental professionals. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 6574–6583. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.10152

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles