Various methods to assess knee proprioception
A review
Keywords:
various methods, Knee, proprioceptionAbstract
Introduction: Proprioception is a vital aspect of motor control and when degraded or lost can have a profound impact on function in diverse clinical populations. This systematic review aimed to identify clinically related tools to measure proprioceptive acuity. The major purpose of this systematic review was to identify and categorise the methods that have been developed and utilised to test proprioceptive accuracy in a comprehensive manner. Methods: The pub med, Scopus, Web of Science and the other search engine/databases used: Cochrane database / SCIRE / PEDro / CINAHL/ EMBASE, ERIC were systematically searched. Conclusions: The TTDPM method has less relative ecological validity, but has high conceptual purity, Although JPR tests may have less relative test validity, but more clinically feasible, The AMEDA method appears to have better ecological validity and relatively better test validity and data validity.
Downloads
References
Goble DJ. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice. Physical therapy. 2010 Aug 1;90(8):1176-84.
Moravveji H, Ghanbari A, Kamali F. Proprioception of knee joint in atheletes and non atheletes obese. Global J Health Sci. 2017;9:286-93.
Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: a critical review of methods. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2016 Mar 1;5(1):80-90.
Das PR, Yadav S, Ankita MR. There is a significant difference between joint position sense among male and female obese individuals in which female obese subjects have performed more Joint Position Sense Error than male obese subjects. JK-Practitioner. 2020 Jan;25(1-4):21.
SARIALİOĞLU N. Analysis of the Relationship between Proprioceptive Sensory Functions and Body Mass Index Parameters of Football and Volleyball Players. Uluslararası Anadolu Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019 Aug;4(2):12-6.
Karkousha RN. Sex differences of knee joint repositioning accuracy in healthy adolescents. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2016 Jun;21(1):56-60.
Nitsure P, Prabhu S. Study of differences in proprioception of knee joint with age, gender and lower limb dominance in healthy asymptomatic individuals: an observational study. Sports Med. 2015;2015:1-5.
Macwan N, Parmar LD. Proprioceptive Impairments in OA Knee Patients.
Li L, Ji ZQ, Li YX, Liu WT. Correlation study of knee joint proprioception test results using common test methods. Journal of physical therapy science. 2016;28(2):478-82.
Mir SM, Talebian S, Naseri N, Hadian MR. Assessment of knee proprioception in the anterior cruciate ligament injury risk position in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study. Journal of physical therapy science. 2014;26(10):1515-8.
Kumar A. Joint proprioception in normal and osteoarthritic knees. Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy. 2012;2(4):1-4.
Kiran D, Carlson M, Medrano D, Smith DR. Correlation of three different knee joint position sense measures. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2010 Aug 1;11(3):81-5.
Boerboom AL, Huizinga MR, Kaan WA, Stewart RE, Hof AL, Bulstra SK, Diercks RL. Validation of a method to measure the proprioception of the knee. Gait & Posture. 2008 Nov 1;28(4):610-4.
Olsson L, Lund H, Henriksen M, Rogind H, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsøe B. Test–retest reliability of a knee joint position sense measurement method in sitting and prone position. Advances in Physiotherapy. 2004 Mar 1;6(1):37-47.
Pincivero DM, Bachmeier BR, Coelho AJ. The effects of joint angle and reliability on knee proprioception. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2001 Oct 1;33(10):1708-12.
Suryasa, W., Sudipa, I. N., Puspani, I. A. M., & Netra, I. (2019). Towards a Change of Emotion in Translation of Kṛṣṇa Text. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(2), 1221-1231.
Yarmukhamedova, N. F., Matkarimova, D. S., Bakieva, S. K., & Salomova, F. I. (2021). Features of the frequency of distribution of alleles and genotypes of polymorphisms of the gene Tnf-A (G-308a) in patients with rhinosinusitis and the assessment of their role in the development of this pathology. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(1), 164-168. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v4n1.1671
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
