The complexity of policy making in pandemic crisis: Harmonizing national policy with global prevention pandemic policy
Keywords:
the complexity of policy making, policy capacity, transnational administration, COVID-19Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the complexity of policy making in the pandemic crisis in the current situation. How do the all countries make “trial and error” policy model in dealing with the dynamic changing environment. The administrative state's exclusive ability to guide and manage public policy and administration is increasingly being challenged in both developing and developed countries. The research approach is content review of official documents and online news from each continent, which is defined by a few nations, in order to get a broad image of how complicated policymaking is. This call identifies a slew of regional and global governance actors with sway over state administrative and policy decisions. The findings are there has been a proliferation of institutional procedures and policy-making mechanisms and beyond but frequently conflicting with conventional state policy processes of the government policy delivery. Upcoming Events Formal and informal institutions and actors, often in conjunction with national public administrations, but more often on their own, are at the heart of these policy processes. Multi-stakeholder ventures, global public-private partnerships, and global commissions are all examples of this.
Downloads
References
Capano, G. (2020). Policy design and state capacity in the COVID-19 emergency in Italy: if you are not prepared for the (un)expected, you can be only what you already are. Policy and Society, 39(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783790
Capano, G., Howlett, M., Jarvis, D. S. L., Ramesh, M., & Goyal, N. (2020). Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses. Policy and Society, 39(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
Carter, D. P., & May, P. J. (2020). Making sense of the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic response: A policy regime perspective. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1758991
Cheung, A. B. L. (2004). Strong executive, weak policy capacity: The changing environment of policy‐making in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Political Science, 12(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370408434232
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Balancing Governance Capacity and Legitimacy: How the Norwegian Government Handled the COVID-19 Crisis as a High Performer. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 774–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13241
Dunlop, C. A. (2015). Organizational political capacity as learning. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.007
Hartley, K., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2020). Policymaking in a low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Policy and Society, 39(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783791
Howlett, M. (2015). Policy analytical capacity: The supply and demand for policy analysis in government. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.002
Hughes, A., Gleeson, D., Legge, D., & Lin, V. (2015). Governance and policy capacity in health development and implementation in Australia. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.11.001
Ii, B. A. B., & Pustaka, T. (1998). oogerwerf (Ahli bahasa Tobing, 1983:7), mengartikan “ kebijaksanaan adalah sebagai usaha mencapai tujuan-tujuan tertentu dengan sarana-sarana tertentu dan dalam urutan waktu”. 19. 19–45.
Jensen, O. (2019). Designing effective water policy: capacity and effectiveness of reforms in developing countries. Policy and Society, 38(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1513438
Kim, P. S. (2020). South Korea’s fast response to coronavirus disease: implications on public policy and public management theory. Public Management Review, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1766266
Lee, S., Hwang, C., & Moon, M. J. (2020). Policy learning and crisis policy-making: quadruple-loop learning and COVID-19 responses in South Korea. Policy and Society, 39(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785195
Lum, T., Shi, C., Wong, G., & Wong, K. (2020). COVID-19 and Long-Term Care Policy for Older People in Hong Kong. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4–5), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1773192
Maor, M., Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R., & Chinitz, D. (2020). When COVID-19, constitutional crisis, and political deadlock meet: the Israeli case from a disproportionate policy perspective. Policy and Society, 39(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783792
Mastracci, S. H. (2007). Redistributive Policy: Capacity and Outcomes over the Business Cycle. Review of Political Economy, 19(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250701622337
Mei, C. (2020). Policy style, consistency and the effectiveness of the policy mix in China’s fight against COVID-19. Policy and Society, 39(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787627
Migone, A. R. (2020). The influence of national policy characteristics on COVID-19 containment policies: a comparative analysis. Policy Design and Practice, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1804660
Migone, A. R. (2020). Trust, but customize: federalism’s impact on the Canadian COVID-19 response. Policy and Society, 39(3), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783788
Migone, A. R. (2020). Trust, but customize: federalism’s impact on the Canadian COVID-19 response. Policy and Society, 39(3), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783788
Moon, M. J. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 with Agility, Transparency, and Participation: Wicked Policy Problems and New Governance Challenges. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13214
Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2017). Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service. Public Management Review, 19(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1148191
Peters, B. G. (2015). Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.005
Pierre, J. (2020). Nudges against pandemics: Sweden’s COVID-19 containment strategy in perspective. Policy and Society, 39(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783787
Publik, A. K. K., & Kebijakan, P. (2008). BAB II KAJIAN TEORI A. Konsep Kebijakan Publik 1. Pengertian Kebijakan. 11–47.
Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Conclusion: Governance arrangements and policy capacity for policy integration. Policy and Society, 28(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.005
Rocco, P., Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2020). Stuck in neutral? Federalism, policy instruments, and counter-cyclical responses to COVID-19 in the United States. Policy and Society, 39(3), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783793
Thomas Hale , Noam Angrist , Rafael Goldszmidt, Beatriz Kira , Anna Petherick , Toby Phillips, Samuel Webster, Emily Cameron-Blake , Laura Hallas, Saptarshi Majumdar, and Helen Tatlow. (2021). “A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).” Nature Human Behaviour.
Tieman, M. (2011). The application of Halal in supply chain management: In-depth interviews. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831111139893
Walter, J., Tiernan, A., Head, B., & Edwards, M. (2020). Policy capacity in disruptive times. Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1686118
Woo, J. J. (2020). Policy capacity and Singapore’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy and Society, 39(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783789
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001
Xue, E., Li, J., Li, T., & Shang, W. (2020). China’s education response to COVID-19: A perspective of policy analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1793653Widana, I.K., Dewi, G.A.O.C., Suryasa, W. (2020). Ergonomics approach to improve student concentration on learning process of professional ethics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 429-445.
Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
