An observational study of comparison between laparoscopic retro-rectal vs open pre-peritoneal Ventral hernia repair

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.10591

Authors

  • Mitkumar Rojesara Senior resident, Department of general surgery, G.C.S Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Ahmedabad
  • Akshay Sutaria Assistant Professor, Department of general surgery, Parul institute of medical sciences and research, Vadodara
  • Chirag Parikh Associate professor, Department of general surgery, Parul institute of medical sciences and research, Vadodara
  • Rahul Damor Assistant Professor, Department of general surgery, Parul institute of medical sciences and research, Vadodara
  • Jaimish Gajjar Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, G.C.S Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Ahmedabad

Keywords:

Hernias, observational study, laparoscopic retro-rectal, open pre-peritoneal ventral

Abstract

Background: Hernias are one of the most common anatomical derangements in men and women and have left an indelible mark throughout most of recorded history. For hundreds of years various surgical and non-surgical treatments were offered to patients suffering from chronic pain, obstruction and strangulation related to their hernias. Materials & Methods: The study was undertaken in tertiary health centre in prospective manner from July 2017 to July 2019 on Laparoscopic retro-rectal versus Open pre-peritoneal ventral hernia repair. Results: In present study, mean age of patients in Laparoscopy group was 45.26 years & in Open group was 48.92 years. 25 patients were males and 15 patients were females in the study. 10 patients were of Umbilical hernia, 3 patients were of Paraumbilical hernia and 2 patients were of Epigastric hernia in Laparoscopy group. While for Open group there were 14, 7 & 4 patients respectively. Swelling in abdomen which disappears on lying down was the main complaint of patients, followed by pain in abdomen. Average BMI of patients in Laparoscopy group was 25 Kg/m2 while in Open group it was 25.33 Kg/m2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey & Love’s Short Practice of Surgery 27th Edition

Balaji Purusotham et .al “ comparative study between Laparascopic and open umbilical and paraumbilical hernia” Int .surg.J 2015 May2(2):204-213.

Jaykar RD, Varudkar AS, Akamanchi AK. A clinical study of ventral hernia. Int Surg J. 2017 Jun 22; 4(7):2326.

Khidoyatova, M. R., Kayumov, U. K., Inoyatova, F. K., Fozilov, K. G., Khamidullaeva, G. A., & Eshpulatov, A. S. (2022). Clinical status of patients with coronary artery disease post COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1858

M Porecha et.al “Comparative study of Laparascopic versus Open ventral hernia Reapir.”Int.surg.J (2009) volume 22 (2).

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Published

14-08-2022

How to Cite

Rojesara, M., Sutaria, A., Parikh, C., Damor, R., & Gajjar, J. (2022). An observational study of comparison between laparoscopic retro-rectal vs open pre-peritoneal Ventral hernia repair. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 8426–8438. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.10591

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles