Comparative evaluation of frictional resistance of extracoronal attachments of different designs and lengths in fixed partial denture

A finite element analysis

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.10633

Authors

  • Prajakta Barapatre Assistant Professor, Dept of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, MGDCH, Rajasthan, India
  • Radha Chauhan Assistant Professor, Dept of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, MGDCH, Rajasthan, India
  • Rajeev Shrivastava Senior Lecturer, Dept of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Sakri, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Abhyutthan Sinha Private Practitioner, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Ankita Gidwani PG student, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, New Horizon Dental College and Research institute, Sakri, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Anjali Tahalramani BDS, Private Practitioner, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India

Keywords:

Attachments, fixed dental prosthesis, force, frictional resistance, length and design of attachment

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different extracoronal attachment lengths and designs on frictional resistance and the vertical force required to create that resistance in fixed partial dentures (FPD). Setting and Design: Finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Four manufacturers were considered for the FPD's extracoronal attachments because to their varying designs and length options (3 mm, 3.5 mm, 4 mm, 4.5 mm, and 5 mm). Catia V5 software was used to create 3D models of the samples and perform simulations on them. To simulate medical facilities, the application was adjusted to take into consideration the characteristics. The amount of frictional resistance and the required vertical force for that resistance were calculated by finite element analysis using ANSYS workbench 15.0. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Results: When compared to Panavia SA cements, the average microhardness of Variolink N resin cements was much higher (P 0.001). Compared to Panavia SA resin cements, the sorption/solubility of Variolink N cements was statistically substantially lower at the 0.05 level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbarov, A. N., & Xabilov, D. N. U. (2021). The condition of the oral cavity in patients who have had a viral infection COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(4), 381-383. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v4n4.1796

Badwaik PV, Pakwan AJ. Non‑rigid connectors in fixed prosthodontics: Current concepts with a case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5:99‑102.

Can G, Özmumcu B, Altinci P. In vitro retention loss of attachment‑retained removable partial denture. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:1049‑53.

Dange SP, Khalikar AN, Kumar S. Non‑rigid connectors in fixed dental prosthesis – A Case Report. JIDA 2008;2:356.

Lin CL, Wang JC, Kuo YC. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant‑supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non‑rigid connections. J Biomech 2006;39:453‑63.

Modi R, Kohli S, Rajeshwari K, Bhatia S. A three‑dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5‑unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector. Eur J Dent 2015;9:255‑61.

Oruc S, Eraslan O, Tukay HA, Atay A. Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:185‑92.

Shillinburg HT Jr., Sather DA, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DL, Blanco LJ, et al. Fundamental of fixed Prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence; 2012. p. 4:91‑2.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(2), vi-ix. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n2.2937

The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:e1‑38.

Vaidya S, Kapoor C, Bakshi Y, Bhalla S. Achieving an esthetic smile with fixed and removal prosthesis using extracoronal castable precision attachments. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15:284‑8.

Wang HY, Zhang YM, Yao D, Chen JH. Effects of rigid and nonrigid extracoronal attachments on supporting tissues in extension base partial removable dental prostheses: A nonlinear finite element study. J Prosthetic Dent 2011;105:338‑46.

Published

15-08-2022

How to Cite

Barapatre, P., Chauhan, R., Shrivastava, R., Sinha, A., Gidwani, A., & Tahalramani, A. (2022). Comparative evaluation of frictional resistance of extracoronal attachments of different designs and lengths in fixed partial denture: A finite element analysis. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 8599–8604. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.10633

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)