Effects of various agitation techniques on sealer penetration in dentinal tubules using CLSM
An in-vitro study
Keywords:
sealer, endoactivator, obturation, NAOClAbstract
Aim: To compare the effect of ultrasonic, sonic and rotary sealer activation techniques on depth of penetration of sealer in the dentinal tubules. Materials and Methods: Freshly extracted 60 single rooted human permanent mandibuar premolar with mature apex were collected. A size 10 no. K file (Dentsply Maillefer) was introduced into each canal. The irrigation procedure was accomplished by using 2ml of 5.25% NAOCl for each file used. Roots were randomly divided into 3 groups on the basis of sealer activation techniques. The specimens were kept in incubator at 37 degree Centigrade temperature for 2 days. The dentin segments were examined on a confocal microscope in Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi under 4X,10X magnification. Results: A total of 60 teeth were included in the study and they were divided into three groups on the basis of method of agitation of sealer: GROUP I - Lentulospiral, Group II-Ultrasonic endodontic tip, Group III - Endoactivator and obturation was done with gutta percha. Mean percentage and depth of penetration was greatest in Group II i.e. Ultrasonics when used for agitation and statistically significant than Group I lentulospiral and Group III Endoactivator.
Downloads
References
Abarajithan M, Dham S, Velmurugan N, Valerian-Albuquerque D, Ballal S, Senthilkumar H. C of E irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: An in vitronstudy. OSOMOPORE. 2011;112:407–11.
Akcay M, Arslan H, Durmus N, Mese M, Capar ID. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study. Lasers Surg Med. 2016;48:70–6.
Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T. KEI flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: A CFD study. IEJ. 2009;42:144–55.
Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015;41(1):72–78.
Castagnola R, Lajolo C, Minciacchi I, Cretella G, Foti R, Marigo L, et al. Efficacy of three different irrigation techniques in the removal of smear layer and organic debris from root canal wall: A scanning electron microscope s SFE of three different irrigation techniques in the removal of smear layer and organic debris from root canal wall: A scanning electron microscope study. GIE. 2014;28:79–86.
Chandra SS, Shankar P, Indira R. Depth of penetration of four resin sealers into radicular dentinal tubules: A confocal microscopic study. J Endod. 2012;38:1412–6.
Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems? J Endod. 2009;35:545–9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.011.
Generali L, Prati C, Pirani C, Cavani F, Gatto MR, Gandolfi MG. D dye technique and fluid filtration test to evaluate early sealing ability of an endodontic sealer. COI. 2016;21:1267–76.
Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35:791–804.
Guimarães BM, Amoroso-Silva PA, Alcalde MP, Marciano MA, de Andrade FB, Duarte MA. Influence of Ultrasonic Activation of 4 Root Canal Sealers on the Filling Quality. J Endod 2014;40:964-968.
Howard RK, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE, Yaccino JM. Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques. J Endod. 2011;37:1301–5.
Khademi A, Yazdizadeb M. FD of the MIS for P of I to the AT of RCS. JE. 2006;32:417–20.
Moon YM, Shon WJ, Baek SH, Bae KS, Kum KY, Lee W. E of final irrigation regimen on sealer penetration in curved root canals. JE. 2010;36:732–6.
Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012;38:445–8.
Nielsen BA. BJC of the E system to needle irrigation of root canals. JE. 2007;33:1–5.
Nikhil V, Bansal P. SSE of technique of sealer agitation on percentage and depth of MF sealer penetration: A comparative in-vitro study. JCD. 2015;18:119–23.
Nikhil V, Singh R. Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16:294–9.
Ordinola RZ, Monteiro CB, Marcia S. D and percentage of penetration of endodontic sealers into dentinal tubules after root canal obturation using a lateral compaction technique: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. OSOMOPORE. 2009;108:450–7.
Patel DV, Sherriff M, Ford TR, Watson TF. MFT penetration of R primer and T into root canal dentinal tubules: A confocal microscopic study. IEJ. 2007;40:67–71.
Saber SE. HAE of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal. JE. 2011;37:1272–5.
Saleh IM, Ruyter IE. Haapasalo M/ØDS of E faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after root canal filling with different root canal sealers in vitro. IEJ. 2004;37:193–8.
Sen BH, PisKin B, Baran N. The effect of tubular penetration of root canal sealers on dye microleakage. IEJ. 1996;29:23–8.
Siu C. BJC of the debridement efficacy of the E irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation in vivo. JE. 2010;36:1782–5.
Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864
Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K, et al. E of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. JE. 2010;36:745–50.
Torres D, Rodriguez MP. LCE of the E system in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. JE. 2010;36:308–11.
Weis MV, Parashos P, Messer HH. Effect of obturation technique on sealer cement thickness and dentinal tubule penetration. Int Endod J. 2004;37:653–63.
Weis MW, Parashos P. MHE of obturation technique on sealer cement thickness and dentinal tubule penetration. IEJ. 2004;37:653–63.
Wijayanti, N. (2021). Factors related to behavior the community in disposing of garbage. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(1), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v4n1.1226
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.