An in-vitro comparative evaluation for detection of residual gutta-percha after root canal retreatment with four different files using stereo microscope

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n7.10799

Authors

  • R. Tejasree Rathod Assistant professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kadapa
  • Satyanarayana Reddy Poreddy Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Government Dental College and Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh-516002
  • Satyanarayana Reddy Poreddy Associate professor Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Government Dental College and Hospital, Kadapa,Andhra Pradesh-516002
  • G. Durgabhavani Department of conservative dentistry and endodontics, Assistant professor, Government Dental College And Hospital, Kadapa
  • Prasanthi Gonapa Assistant professor Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Government dental college and Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh-516002
  • Gopal Thodsam Asst. Prof Dept. of Dentistry Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Adilabad 504001
  • B. Rajendra Prasad Prof and HOD, Dept of prosthodontics, vice principal GSL Dental College And Hospital, Lakshmipuram, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Andhra pradesh

Keywords:

Rotary, Retreatment

Abstract

Background: Removal of gutta-percha using hand files with or without solvent is tedious and time consuming process especially when the root filling material is well compacted8. Therefore, the use of NiTi rotary instruments in the root canal retreatment might decrease patient and operator fatigue and various studies have reported their efficacy, cleaning ability and safety. Several NiTi rotary instruments also were been used to remove gutta-percha. Here in this study four file systems were used to assess the efficacy of each file system in retreatment procedures.Materials & methods: The study samples comprised of 80 extracted anteriors having single root canals with fully formed apices were collected. The crowns were de-coronated with a diamond disc to leave a 16-mm root. A size 10 K-file was introduced into the canal until it was visible at the apical foramen. The working length was determined by subtracting 1mm from this measurement. During shaping, each canal was irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite then smear layer was removed with 17% EDTA and 1 ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite. After one month the teeth were divided into following groups with 20 specimens each as follows. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kenneth M. Hargreaves, Stephen Cohen. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp, 10th Edition. Non-surgical Retreatment. Page no. 890-952.

J.F. Siqueria Jr. Etiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34:1-10.

Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P. Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992; 18: 625-7.

Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A. Endodontic retreatment: case se¬lection and technique. Part 3: retreatment techniques. J Endod 1990; 16: 543-9.

Takahashi C, Cunha R, DeMartin A, Fontana C, Silveira C, Silveira Bueno C. In Vitro Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment System for Gutta-Percha Removal with or without a Solvent. J Endod 2009; 35(11):1580-3.

Giuliani V,Cocchetti R,Pagavino G. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Retreatment Files in Removing Filling Materials during Root Canal Retreatment.J Endod 2008; 34(11):1381-4.

Gu L-S, Ling J-Q, Wei X, HuangX-Y. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals. Int Endod J 2008; 41(4):288-95.

De Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira FB. Comparison between gutta-percha and resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreat¬ment. J Endod 2006; 32:362-4.

Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH. Efficacy of two rotary instruments in the removal of Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment. J Endod 2007; 33:38-41.

Tasdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Celik D. Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals. Int Endod J 2007; 41:191-6.

Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, Huang XY. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment 8 for gutta-percha removal from root canals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:288-95.

L. V. Betti & C. M. Bramante Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment International Endodontic Journal, 2001, 34, 514–519.

Marcos de Azevedo Rios, Alexandre Mascarenhas Villela, Rodrig Sanches Cunha, Efficacy of 2 Reciprocating Systems Compared with Rotary Retreatment System for Gutta-percha Removal (J Endod 2014;40:543–546).

Hulsmann M, Bluhm.V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2004;37:468-76.

Francesco Somma, Giuseppe Cammarota. The Effectiveness of Manual and Mechanical Instrumentation for the Retreatment of Three Different Root Canal Filling Materials. J Endo 2008, 34(4),

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

Published

19-07-2022

How to Cite

Rathod, R. T., Poreddy, S. R., Poreddy, S. R., Durgabhavani, G., Gonapa, P., Thodsam , G., & Prasad, B. R. (2022). An in-vitro comparative evaluation for detection of residual gutta-percha after root canal retreatment with four different files using stereo microscope. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S7), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n7.10799

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)