Strain-counterstrain versus muscle energy technique in sacroiliac joint dysfunction
A randomized controlled trial
Keywords:
muscle energy technique, strain-counterstain, sacroiliac joint dysfunctionAbstract
Background: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has been long considered an important source of low back pain because its prevalence varies from 10% to 30% with axial low back pain. Several manual techniques were used in SIJ dysfunction (SIJD) treatment as manipulation, muscle energy technique (MET), strain-counterstrain (SCS), and mobilization. However, there is little evidence about the efficacy of MET and SCS have been reported. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Evaluation and treatment were taken at Warraq Central hospital and El-Sahel hospital in the Giza governorate, Egypt. Purpose: Examine the effect of (SCS) versus (MET) on pain pressure threshold (PPT), functional disability, and the innominate angle tilt with SIJ dysfunction. Methods: Fifty-six patients with SIJD were recruited and randomly assigned to receive treatment with either SCS or MET. The outcomes were PPT by Pressure algometer and functional disability by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the innominate angle tilt by Palpation Meter (PALM). All outcomes were assessed at pre and post intervention and frequency of treatment was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.
Downloads
References
Abutaleb EE, Eldesoky MT, Rasol SAE. Effect of Muscle Energy Technique on Anterior Pelvic Tilt in Lumbar Spondylosis Patients. Int J Medical, Heal Biomed Bioeng Pharm Eng. 2015;9(8):639–42.
Alkady SME, Kamel RM, AbuTaleb E, Lasheen Y, Alshaarawy FA. Efficacy of Mulligan Mobilization Versus Muscle Energy Technique In Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Int J Physiother. 2017;4(5):311–8.
Bokarius A V, Bokarius V. Evidence-Based Review of Manual Therapy Efficacy in Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10(5):451–8.
Booth J, Morris S. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology The sacroiliac joint e Victim or culprit. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019;33(1):88–101.
Brolinson PG, Kozar AJ, Cibor G. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003;2(1):47–56.
Chaitow L, Murphy DR, Dacan D. Muscle Energy Techniques. 2nd Editio. Boston: Harcourt publisher; 2001. 108–115 p.
Chou LH, Slipman CW, Bhagia SM, Tsaur L, Bhat AL, Isaac Z, et al. Inciting events initiating injection-proven sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pain Med. 2004;5(1):26–32.
Copay AG, Cher DJ. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment ? Qual Life Res. 2016;25(2):283–92.
D’Ambrogio KJ, Roth GB. Positional release therapy: Assessment & treatment of musculoskeletal dysfunction. Mosby Incorporated; 1997.
Dayanlr IO, Birinci T, Kaya Mutlu E, Akcetin MA, Akdemir AO. Comparison of Three Manual Therapy Techniques as Trigger Point Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2020;26(4):291–9.
Ellythy MA. Efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Strain Counter Strain on Low Back Dysfunction. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2012;17(2):29–35.
Fortin JD. Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionA New Perspective. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1993;3(3):31–43.
Fryer G, Pearce AJ. The effect of muscle energy technique on corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability in asymptomatic participants. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013;17(4):440–7.
Hagins M, Brown M, Cook C, Gstalder K, Kam M, Kominer G, et al. Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the Palpation Meter ( PALM ) in Measuring Pelvic Position. J Man Manip Ther. 1998;6(3):130–6.
Hariharasudhan R, Balamurugan J. A randomized double-blinded study of effectiveness of strain counter-strain technique and muscle energy technique in reducing pain and disability in subjects with mechanical low back pain. Saudi J Sport Med. 2014;14(2):83.
Hilal Telli MD, Serkan Telli MD, Murat Topal MD. The validity and reliability of provocation tests in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Pain Physician. 2018;21:E367–76.
Huijing PA, Baan GC. Myofascial force transmission via extramuscular pathways occurs between antagonistic muscles. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008;188(4):400–14.
Ibáñez-García J, Alburquerque-Sendín F, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Girao D, Atienza-Meseguer A, Planella-Abella S, et al. Changes in masseter muscle trigger points following strain-counterstrain or neuro-muscular technique. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2009;13(1):2–10.
Kannabiran B. A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Two Manual Therapy Techniques on Pain and Lumbar Range of Motion in Individuals with Mechanical Low Back Ache. Ecronicon Orthop. 2015;2(1):36–42.
Korr IM. Proprioceptors and somatic dysfunction. J Am Osteopat Assoc. 1975;74:638–50.
Koura G, Hamada H, Mohamed YE, Balbaa AA, El-Nassag BA, Baghdadi AR. Impact of strain-counterstrain on treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Human Movement. 2020;22(1):42-9.
Lenehan KL, Fryer G, McLaughlin P. The effect of muscle energy technique on gross trunk range of motion. J Osteopath Med. 2003;6(1):13–8.
Manzoor R, Bashir MS, Faisal B. Comparative Study of Muscle Energy Technique and Mckenzie Therapy in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain. J Riphah Coll Rehabil Sci. 2020;8(1): S4–9.
Meseguer AA, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Navarro-Poza JL, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Gandia JJB. Immediate effects of the strain/counterstrain technique in local pain evoked by tender points in the upper trapezius muscle. Clin Chiropr. 2006;9(3):112–8.
Mohamed Mn AES. Effect of therapeutic exercises with or without positional release technique in treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial. Egypt J Occup Med. 2014;38(2):125–39.
Mohamed Mn AES. Effect of therapeutic exercises with or without positional release technique in treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial. Egypt J Occup Med. 2014;38(2):125–39.
Mohammed S, Alkady E, Kamel RM, Abutaleb E. Effect of muscle energy technique in chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction. SVU-International J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;1(1):8–19.
Nagrale A V, Glynn P, Joshi A, Ramteke G. The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2010;18(1):37–43.
Novoa, R. B. (2021). State of the art and future applications of digital health in Chile. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(3), 355-361. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v4n3.1772
Nowak T. The effects of ischaemic compression vs integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on the gluteus medius muscle in the treatment of sacroiliac joint syndrome. University of Johannesburg(Doctoral Dissertation); 2012.
Patel P, Rathod VJ. Effectiveness of manipulation and muscle energy techniques in subjects with SI joint dysfunction. international J Pharm Sci Heal Care. 2015;4(5):16–29.
Patel VD, Eapen C, Ceepee Z. E ® ect of muscle energy technique with and without strain – counterstrain technique in acute low back pain — A randomized clinical trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018;38(1):41–51.
Patel VD, Eapen C, Ceepee Z. Effect of muscle energy technique with and without strain–counterstrain technique in acute low back pain—A randomized clinical trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018;38(1):41–51.
Patil PN, Chandu B, Metgud S, Khatri S. Effectiveness of muscle energy technique on quadratus lumborum in acute low back pain-randomized controlled trial. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2010;4(1):54–8.
Petrone MR, Guinn J, Reddin A, Sutlive TG, Flynn TW, Garber MP. The accuracy of the palpation meter (PALM) for measuring pelvic crest height difference and leg length discrepancy. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2003;33(6):319–25.
Prather H. Sacroiliac joint pain: practical management. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(4):252–5.
Rupert MP, Lee M, Manchikanti L, Datta S, Cohen SP. Evaluation of Sacroiliac Joint Interventions: A Systematic Appraisal of the Literature. Pain Physician. 2009;12:399–418.
Sachdeva S, Kalra S, Pawaria S. Effects of Muscle Energy Technique versus Mobilization on Pain and Disability in Post-Partum Females with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Indian J Heal Sci Care. 2018;5(1):10–7.
Sanika V, Prem V, Karvannan H. Comparison of glutues maximus activation to flexion bias exercises along with met technique in subjects with anterior rotated sacroiliac joint dysfunction—a randomised control trial. Int J Ther Massage Bodyw Res Educ Pract. 2021;14(1):30–8.
Schauer-alvarez C, Wong CK. Effect of Strain Counterstrain on Pain and Strength in Hip Musculature. J Man Manip Ther. 2004;12(4):212–20.
Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(1):31–7.
Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864
Van Leeuwen RJ, Szadek K, de Vet H, Zuurmond W, Perez R. Pain pressure threshold in the region of the sacroiliac joint in patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Physician. 2016;19(3):147–54.
Vanelderen P, Szadek K, Cohen SP, De Witte J, Lataster A, Patijn J, et al. 13. Sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10(5):470–8.
Vleeming A, Albert HB, Östgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(6):794–819.
Vleeming A, Van Wingerden J-P, Dijkstra PF, Stoeckart R, Snijders CJ, Stijnen T. Mobility in the sacroiliac joints in the elderly: a kinematic and radiological study. Clin Biomech. 1992;7(3):170–6.
Webb TR, Rajendran D. Myofascial techniques: what are their effects on joint range of motion and pain?–a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(3):682–99.
Wilson E, Payton O, Donegan-Shoaf L, Dec K. Muscle energy technique in patients with acute low back pain: a pilot clinical trial. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2003;33(9):502–12.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.