A comparative study of liquid based cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid as screening method of premalignant lesions of cervix

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11831

Authors

  • Vaibhav Kanti Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Alem Phom Rajshri Dashrath Autonomous state Medical College, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Geeta Maurya Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Vandana Verma All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Soniya Vishwakarma Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Nupur Mittal Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

VIA, LBC, premalignant, cervical lesions, Sensitivity, Specificity, histopathology

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of premalignant lesions of cervix and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of liquid based Cytology and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid in predicting pre- malignant lesions of cervix. It was a facility based cross sectional study conducted on  sexually active women in the age group of 18 to 60 years. Detailed history was obtained from all the patients followed by thorough examination. Per Speculum Examination, LBC and VIA was performed in all cases using standard procedure. Women with either positive VIA or with positive Cervical Cytology (LBC) or both positive, were subjected to cervical biopsy. A total of 2195 women were enrolled for LBC and VIA both. Liquid based cytology revealed premalignant lesions in 4.2% cases whereas VIA was positive in 7% cases. Histopathology revealed CIN 1, 2 and 3 in 22.5%, 11.1% and 4.1% cases respectively. Sensitivity of VIA was 76% and that of LBC was 55% whereas specificity of LBC was higher (70.88%) as compared to VIA (46.5%). VIA is more sensitive than the LBC for the detection of pre malignant lesions of the cervix. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alakananda, Sarma U., Biswas I. (2016). Histopathological Correlation With Cervical Cytology. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 15, 53- 58.

Arbyn M., Weiderpass E., Bruni L., de Sanjosé, S., Saraiya M., Ferlay J., & Bray F. (2020). Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.The Lancet. Global health, 8(2), e191–e203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6

Balasubramaniam G., Gaidhani R.H., Khan A., Saoba S., Mahantshetty U., Maheshwari A.(2021). Survival rate of cervical cancer from a study conducted in India. Indian J Med Sci ,73(2), 203-11.

Bergeron C., Bishop J., Lemarie A., Cas F., Ayivi J., Huynh B., Barrasso R. (2001). Accuracy of thin layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. Acta Cytol, 45(4), 519-24

Bhattacharjya H., Debbarma A, Reang T.(2015). Knowledge and practice regarding prevention of cervical cancer among women attending a tertiary care centre of Tripura. Indian J Community Med Public Health. 2015, 2, 176-9. https://www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/945

Bhattacharyya A.K., Nath J.D., Deka H.(2015). Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer. Journal of mid-life health, 6(2), 53. 10.4103/0976-7800.158942

Chaudhary R.D., Inamdar S.A., Hari Haran C. (2014). Correlation of diagnostic efficacy of unhealthy cervix by cytology, colposcopy and histopathology in women of rural areas. Int J ReprodContraceptObstetGynecol, 3, 213-8. Doi -10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20140343

Consul S., Agrawal A., Sharma H., Bansal A, Gutch M., Jain N. (2012). Comparative study of effectiveness of Pap smear versus visual inspection with acetic acid and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine for mass screening of premalignant and malignant lesion of cervix. Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology: official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology, 33(3), 161. 10.4103/0971-5851.103143.

Gakidou E., Nordhagen S., Obermeyer Z. (2008). Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities. PLoS Med, 17, 5(6), e132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050132.

Gandamayu, I. B. M., Antari, N. W. S., & Strisanti, I. A. S. (2022). The level of community compliance in implementing health protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n2.1897

Joshi C., Kujur P., Thakur N. C.(2015). correlation of Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Relation to Histopathological Findings in Detection of Premalignant Lesions of Cervix in A Tertiary Care Centre. Int J Sci Stud, 3:55-60. 10.17354/ijss/2015/508.

Kalyankar V.Y., Kalyankar B.V., Gadappa S.N., Kute S. (2017).Colposcopic evaluation of unhealthy cervix and it’s correlation with Papanicolau smear in cervical cancer screening. Int J ReprodContraceptObstetGynecol, 6(11), 4959-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175008

Kaur B., Mohi M.K., Kaur M., Bhagat N.(2017). Comparative study of Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) and Colposcopy for detection of Premalignant Lesions of Cervix. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 6(08), 5363-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijcar.2017.5367.0707

Khatun S., Khatun S.F.(2019). Conventional pap’s test and liquid-based cytology for the screening of cervical cancer with back up colposcopy directed biopsy. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 12(2), 105-8. Doi -10.3329/bsmmuj.v12i2.4122

Pankaj S., Nazneen S., Kumari S., Kumari A., Kumari A., Kumari J., Choudhary V., Kumar S. (2018). Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar. Indian J Cancer, 55(1), 80-83. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_352_17.

Poli U.R., Bidinger P.D., Gowrishankar S.(2015). Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) Screening Program: 7 Years Experience in Early Detection of Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancers in Rural South India. Indian J Community Med, 40(3), 203-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.158873.

Poudel A., Dahal P.(2019). Cytohistological correlation of conventional Papanicolaou smearsin cervical neoplasia at a tertiary care hospital of Nepal. J Pathol Nep, 9, 1475-9. DOI 10.3126/jpn. v9i1.23372

Ranjana H. &Sadhna S.(2016). Comparison of conventional Pap smear versus liquid based cytology in a diagnostic centre of central. Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Pathol Oncol , 3, 42-7.

Sachan P.L., Singh M., Patel M.L., Sachan R.(2018). A study on cervical cancer screening using pap smear test and clinical correlation. Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 5(3),337. DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_15_18

Singh U., Anjum Qureshi S., Negi N., Singh N., Goel M., Srivastava K.(2018). Comparative study between liquid-based cytology & conventional Pap smear for cytological follow up of treated patients of cancer cervix. Indian J Med Res, 147(3), 263-267. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_854_16.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Verma R., Khatun S., Phuleman S., Gul R. (2020). Correlation of cervical smear and colposcopy with pathohistological findings in detection of premalignant lesions of cervix at a tertiary care centre. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 7(12), L1-L5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.12.14

Published

18-08-2022

How to Cite

Kanti, V., Phom, A., Maurya, G., Verma, V., Vishwakarma, S., & Mittal, N. (2022). A comparative study of liquid based cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid as screening method of premalignant lesions of cervix. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 7388–7396. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11831

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)