Various modalities of management of segmental fractures of long bones

A prospective study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Telangana India

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11872

Authors

  • L. Ramesh Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Suryapet, Telangana, India
  • K. Ramakrishna Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Suryapet, Telangana, India
  • L. Kiran Kumar Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Suryapet, Telangana, India
  • J. Kranthi Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Suryapet, Telangana, India

Keywords:

segmental fracture, long bones, surgical management, plate technique, conservative management

Abstract

Introduction: Segmental long bone fractures in high energy injuries are a challenging combination of bone and soft-tissue damage and loss. The state of the surrounding soft tissues and the local blood supply to the bone are the most important factors determining the tendency of the fracture to heal. Objectives: To study the efficacy and safety of various method of treatment in segmental fractures long bones and various complications associated with it. Materials and Methods:  20 patients with segmental fractures of long bones, satisfying the inclusion criteria, who were treated with various modalities of management were included in the study.The fractures were evaluated clinically as well as radiologically and the modality of management was based on the type of fracture and associated injuries. Out of 10 tibial fractures, 6 were treated with static intramedullary nail, and 2 with  external fixator 2 conservatively. Out of 5 femoral fractures,4 were treated with intramedullary nail. Out of 2 humerus fractures 2 were treated with dynamic compression plate technique. Out of 3 both bone forearm fractures 3 were treated with dynamic compression plate technique. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babalola OM, Ibraheem GH, Ahmed BA, Olawepo A, Agaja SB, Adeniyi A. Open intramedullary nailing for segmental long bone fractures: An effective alternative in a resourcerestricted environment. Niger J Surg. 2016;22:905

Brumback RJ, Jones AL. Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:1162-6.

Chalidis BE, Petsatodis GE, Sachinis NC, Dimitriou CG, Christodoulou AG. Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures and aseptic nonunions. Can we expect an optimum result? Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction. 2009;4:8994.

Choudary D, Kanthimathi B. A Prospective Comparative Study of Reamed vs. Unreamed Nailing in Fractures Shaft of Tibia. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. 2012;6:21-26.

Giannoudis PV, Hinsche AF, Cohen A, Macdonald DA, Smith RM, Segmental tibial fractures: An assessment of procedures in 27 cases. Injury. 2003;34:756-62.

Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg 1976;58-A:453-8.

Horesh Z, Stein H, Lerner A. Current Trends for the Biological Treatment of Segmental Bone Loss in HighEnergy Long Bone Fractures. Orthopedics. 2006;29:773-7.

Hupel TM, Akesnov SA, Sehemitsch EH: Effect of limited and standard reaming on cortical bone blood flow and early strength of union following segmental fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;100-6.

Jenkins PJ, Keating JF, Simpson AH. Fractures of the tibial shaft. Surgery 2010;28:489-93.

Larsen LB, Madsen JE, Hoiness PR, Ovre S. Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective, randomized study with 3.8 years' follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:144-9.

Naveen Chauhan, T.Somashekarappa, Ajit Singh, Gaurav Singh, Arjun Rawal. Interlocking nail in diaphyseal fracture of tibia –a clinical study. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016;3:1678-1681.

Obremskey WT, Molina CS, Collinge C, Tornetta P, Sagi C, Schmidt A, Probe R, Ahn J, Nana A. Current Practice in the Management of Segmental Bone Defects Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 2013.

Permana, A. T., Suroto, N. S., Parenrengi, M. A., Bajamal, A. H., Lestari, P., & Fauzi, A. A. (2022). Current update on stroke ischemic management: Stem cell as emerging therapy. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1851

Raghunath M, Bishnoi AK, Singh SS, Singh M, Sharma A, Atri K. Management of segmental fractures of tibia and femur by static intramedullary interlocking nailing in twelve dogs. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med. 2012;10:264-72.

Ramkishan D,Narsimlu SY. A Study of Management of Segmental Fractures of the Long Bones.Int J Contem Med Res.2016;3(9):2672-2675.

Sahu RL. Fracture union with closed interlocking nail in segmental tibial shaft fracture. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2016;3:1-5.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

Published

19-08-2022

How to Cite

Ramesh, L., Ramakrishna, K., Kumar, L. K., & Kranthi, J. (2022). Various modalities of management of segmental fractures of long bones: A prospective study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Telangana India. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 6538–6550. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11872

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)