Bacteriological profile of bloodstream infections at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.11881

Authors

  • Anuradha Kumari Tutor, Department of Microbiology, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Bihar, India.
  • Himanshu Bhim Khatri Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Surabhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Siddipet, Telangana, India.
  • Manish Kumar Tiwari Tutor, Department of Microbiology, Saraswati Medical College, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

blood culture, blood stream infection, bacteremia, sepsis, septicemia

Abstract

Invasion of the blood stream by microorganisms constitutes one of the most serious situations in infectious disease. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the bacteria that caused blood stream infections. Methods: This six months prospective and observational study was performed in the department of microbiology at All India institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), New Delhi, India, on 280 blood samples of patients admitted in wards and various ICUs. Microbial detection and identification were done by fully automated BacT/Alert 3D and VITEK 2 systems, respectively. Results: Of the 280 suspected cases, blood culture was positive in 186 (66.4%) cases. Of the 186 isolates, 123 (66.12%) were Gram negative bacterial isolates of which the predominant were Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.64%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.26%), and Escherchia coli (15.44%). Of the positive isolates, 63 (33.87%) were Gram positive bacteria of which MRSA (36.50%) was the predominant organism followed by MSSA (31.74%) and MRCoNS (17.46%). Conclusion: In this study, blood culture was positive in a relatively high proportion of suspected cases of blood stream infections. Automation has higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional methods and can help in significantly reducing mortality and morbidity of blood stream infections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacconi A, Richmond GS, Baroldi MA, Laffler TG, Blyn LB, et al. Improved sensitivity for molecular detection of bacteria and candida in blood. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:3164–74.

Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD. Effect of homebased neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: Field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999; 354:1955-61.

Banik A, Bhat SH, Kumar A, Palit A, Snehaa K. Bloodstream infections and trends of antimicrobial sensitivity patterns at Port Blair. J Lab Physicians 2018;10:332-7

Bizzarro MJ, Raskind C, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Seventy-five years of neonatal sepsis at Yale: 1928-2003. Pediatrics 2005; 116:595-602.

Chaubey VP, Pitout JD, Dalton B, et al. Clinical outcome of empiric antimicrobial therapy of bacteremia due to extended-spectrum betalactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3:116.

Cockerill 3rd FR, Wilson JW, Vetter EA, et al. Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:1724–30.

Désinor OY, Silva JL, Ménos MJ. Neonatal sepsis and meningitis in Haiti. J Trop Pediatr 2004; 50:48-50.

Dewi, P. S., Ratini, N. N., & Trisnawati, N. L. P. (2022). Effect of x-ray tube voltage variation to value of contrast to noise ratio (CNR) on computed tomography (CT) Scan at RSUD Bali Mandara. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijpse.v6n2.9656

Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med 2014; 42:1749–55.

Klein, J.O., et al. 1983. Selection of antimicrobial agents for treatment of neonatal sepsis. Rev. Infect. Dis., 5(Suppl. 1): S55 S64.

Lawn, J.E., Cousens, S., Zupan, J. 2005. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? The Lancet, 365(9462): 891 900.

Lee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Weinstein MP. Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: How many blood cultures are needed? J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:3546 8

Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1546–54.

Riedel S, Bourbeau P, Swartz B, et al. Timing of specimen collection for blood cultures from febrile patients with bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:1381–5.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864

Taur Y, Cohen N, Dubnow S, Paskovaty A, Seo SK. Effect of antifungal therapy timing on mortality in cancer patients with candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54:184–90.

Trevino S and Ross D. Bacterermia and Sepsis. In: Mahon CR, Lehman DC, Manuselis G. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 3rd eds., New Delhi: Elsevier; 2007; pp. 995-1009.

Uslan DZ, Crane SJ, Steckelber JM, Cockerill FR, Sauver JL, Wilson WR. Age- and Sex-Associated Trends in Bloodstream Infection. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:834-839

Wain J, Diep TS, Ho VA, et al. Quantitation of bacteria in blood of typhoid fever patients and relationship between counts and clinical features, transmissibility, and antibiotic resistance. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:1683–7.

Werner AS, Cobbs CG, Kaye D, Hook EW. Studies on the bacteremia of bacterial endocarditis. JAMA 1967; 202:199–203.

Wiratmo, D., Kristhy, M. E., Syam, M. N., & Putra, A. G. (2022). Government policy analysis in health crisis conditions: COVID-19 pandemic management. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), 920–930. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n2.8785

Zaragoza R, Artero A, Camarena JJ, Sancho S, Gonzalez R, Nogueira JM. The influence of inadequate empirical antimicrobial treatment on patients with bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9:412–8.

Published

31-12-2021

How to Cite

Kumari, A., Khatri, H. B., & Tiwari, M. K. (2021). Bacteriological profile of bloodstream infections at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S2), 686–692. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.11881

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles