Eeficiency of conventional technique and surgical operating microscope in crown lengthening: An original research
Keywords:
Periodontal, conventional technique, effectiveness of magnificationAbstract
Background: The success of any periodontal therapy always depends on better visual access and, magnification is an important component which provides good hand eye coordination with a better treatment outcome. The aim of our study is to assess the effectiveness of magnification over conventional method while performing surgical crown lengthening and to evaluate the patient comfort level and pain perception over a period of 3 months. Methods -The study was conducted amongst 20 patients, 10 in each group requiring crown lengthening for restorative purpose and was evaluated ever a period of 3 months. Results - During 3months follow up, significant differences were found between the groups for probing depth with mean difference of 1.22±0.6, position of gingival margin as with mean 2.7±1.15 and biologic width with mean difference 2.8±0.42.Regarding patient comfort and patients pain perception it was found low for microscope group with mean difference of 2±0.67 Conclusion – A good visual access is a primary requisite behind the success of any periodontal therapy and it was concluded from our study that there was significant reduction in probing depth and improvement in biologic width, gingival margin.
Downloads
References
Padbury A. Eber R, Wang HL . Interscations between the gingiva and the margin of restorstaions . J Clin Periodontol 2003:30;379-85
Nugala B, Santhosh Kumar B , Sahitya S, Krishna Pm. Biologic width and its importance in periodontal and restorative dentistry .J Conserv Dent 2012:15;12
Periodontology AA of Glossary of Periodontal terma. American Academy of Periodontology :2001
R Nethravathy, SK Vinoth, AV Thomas, Three different surgical techniques of crown lengthening: A comparative study J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jun; 5(Suppl 1): S14–S16
Samuel B. Low. Clinical Considerations of Non-Surgical Therapy. Periodontol 2000. 1995; 9: 23–26.
Parvez MF, Manjunath N. Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Scaling With and Without Magnification Loupes. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018; 17: 73-76.
Yadav VS, Salaria SK, Bhatia A, Yadav R. Periodontal Microsurgery – Reaching New Heights of Precision. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018; 22: 5-11.
Kapadia JA, Bhedasgoankar SY, Bhandari SD. Periodontal microsurgery: A case report. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013; 17: 790-92.
Valachi B, Valachi K. Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in clinical dentistry: Strategies to address the mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:1604 -12.
David E Deans , Alan J osseous surgery for crown lengthening : a 6 month clinical study , J periodontology 2004 Sep;75(9):1288-94
Rithika arora ,satish C Narula Evaluation of Supracrestal Gingival Tissue After Surgical Crown Lengthening: A 6-Month Clinical Study J Periodontol. 2013 Jul;84(7):934-40
Sharon K Lanning ,Thomas C. Waldrop et al Surgical crown lengthening : Evaluation of the biologic width J Periodontol 2003 Jul;84(7):934-40.
Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938
R Pontoriero, G Carnevale Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study J Periodontol. 2001 Jul;72(7):841-8.
Mamoun J .Use of High Magnification Loupes or Surgical Operating Microscope When Performing Prophylaxes, Scaling or Root Planing Procedures. N Y State Dent J. 2013; 79(5): 48-52.
U. Brägger ,D. Lauchenauer Surgical lengthening of clinical crown . J Periodontology January 1992
Gautami S Penmetsa , Kausalya Devi Panda .Evaluating the efficacy of different magnification variables during root planing procedure under a surgical operating microscope in chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial. J Indian Soc Periodontol Jan-Feb 2020;24(1):32-36.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
