Evaluation of neurosensory disturbance after using separators vs using chisels in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS7.11996

Authors

  • Hisham Sholkamy PhD Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Mohamed F. Shehab Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Department, faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt

Keywords:

bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, neurosensory dysfunction, chisels and separator

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate neurosensory disturbance after using separators Vs chisels in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Methods: A total of (18 patients) 36 sides indicated for BSSO randomly assigned to 2 equal parallel groups; 9 patients (18 sides) treated using chisels (control group) and 9 patients (18 sides) were treated by separators (intervention group). The neurosensory disturbance was assessed for each side. Result: After one year follow up in separator group showed neurosensory dysfunction by 11.1% while chisel group showed 44.4%. Conclusion: The use of separators (splitting forceps and elevators) led to a low percentage of persistent post-operative neurosensory dysfunction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. Part II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol. Published online 1957. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(57)90105-6

Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S. Sensibility following sagittal split osteotomy in the mandible: A prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Published online 1998. doi:10.1097/00006534-199808000-00005

Gassmann CJ, Van Sickels JE, Thrash WJ. Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Published online 1990. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(90)90229-U

Nakagawa K, Ueki K, Takatsuka S. Somatosensory-evoked potential to evaluate the trigeminal nerve after sagittal split osteotomy. :146-152. doi:10.1067/moe.2001.112331

Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen SK, Forssell K, et al. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(1):33-39. doi:10.1054/ijom.2001.0157

Whitesides LM, Meyer RA. Effect of Distraction Osteogenesis on the Severely Hypoplastic Mandible and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(3):292-297. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2003.06.008

Colella G, Cannavale R, Vicidomini A, Lanza A. Neurosensory Disturbance of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(9):1707-1715. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.009

Buckley MJ. Neurosensory Recovery Following Mandibular Bila feral Sagittal Split 0s teo tomy. Published online 1995:1300-1306.

Takeuchi T, Furusawa K, Hirose I. Mechanism of transient mental nerve paraesthesia in sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;32(2):105-108. doi:10.1016/0266-4356(94)90139-2

Mensink G, Zweers A, Corputty JEM. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2007;35(4-5):222-226. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.006

Chortrakarnkij P, Lonic D, Lin HH, Yamaguchi K, Kim SG, Lo LJ. A modified technique of mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy for prevention of inferior alveolar nerve injury: A prospective cohort study and outcome assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(3):S108-S116. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001015

Choi BK, Lee W, Lo LJ, Yang EJ. Is injury to the inferior alveolar nerve still common during orthognathic surgery? Manual twist technique for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56(10):946-951. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.279

Collins PC, Epker BN. max.-fac. Surg. 11 (1983). 1983;11.

Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K. Comparison of different tests assessing neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;27(6):417-421. doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(98)80028-3

Agbaje JO, Salem AS, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R, Politis C. Systematic review of the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and the assessment of neurosensory disturbances. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(4):447-451. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.11.010

O’Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical rehabilitation. Published online 2007:1383.

Frey DR, Hatch JP, Van Sickels JE, Dolce C, Rugh JD. Effects of surgical mandibular advancement and rotation on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder: A 2-year follow-up study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(4):490.e1-490.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.033

Magnusson T. Changes in temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction after surgical correction of dentofacial anomalies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15(6):707-714. doi:10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80111-9

Fiamminghi L, Aversa C. Lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve in sagittal osteotomy of the ramus - Experimental-study. J Maxillofac Surg. 1979;7(C):125-128. doi:10.1016/S0301-0503(79)80024-7

Gil JN, Marin C, Claus JDP, Lima SM. Modified Osteotome for Inferior Border Sagittal Split Osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(9):1840-1842. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.045

Westermark A, Bystedt H, Von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36(6):425-428. doi:10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90457-0

Jette AM. Measuring subjective clinical outcomes. Phys Ther. 1989;69(7):580-584. doi:10.1093/ptj/69.7.580

Bohannon RW. Objective measures. Phys Ther. 1989;69(7):590-593. doi:10.1093/ptj/69.7.590

Clinical Assessment Recommendations | American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT). Accessed December 11, 2021. https://asht.org/practice/clinical-assessment-recommendations

Lundborg G, Rosén B. Invited Personal View Article The two Point Discrimination Test – Time for a re-appraisal? J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:13-17.

Crosby PM, Lee Dellon A. Comparison of two‐point discrimination testing devices. Microsurgery. 1989;10(2):134-137. doi:10.1002/micr.1920100214

Bruckmoser E, Bulla M, Alacamlioglu Y, Steiner I, Watzke IM. Factors influencing neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Retrospective analysis after 6 and 12 months. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(4):473-482. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.08.454

Kuhlefelt M, Laine P, Suominen AL, Lindqvist C, Thorén H. Nerve manipulation during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy increases neurosensory disturbance and decreases patient satisfaction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(10):2052.e1-2052.e5. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.06.444

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864

Published

22-08-2022

How to Cite

Sholkamy, H., & Shehab, M. F. (2022). Evaluation of neurosensory disturbance after using separators vs using chisels in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S7), 2735–2744. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS7.11996

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles