Comparison of nasal symmetry in closed, semi-open and open tip rhinoplasty following primary cleft lip repair

Systematic review and meta analysis

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.12147

Authors

  • Amrutha Varshini K MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, FCLPCS, Lecturer, Nitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mangalore, India
  • Raj Kumar Jaiswal MDS oral and maxillofacial surgery, FCLPCS, Dr Raj's Dental & Facial Surgery Clinic, Consultant, Singrauli hospital & Research Center, Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh
  • Akshat Sharma MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, FCLPCS, Consultant, A.S Thakur multi-speciality hospital, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh
  • Krishna Lohitha. K. MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Fellow in orthognathic surgery and craniofacial anamolies, Kanachur Institute of Medical sciences, Mangalore

Keywords:

rhinoplasty, surgical technique, nose, non-syndromic clefting

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the present research was to assess the amount of nasal symmetry achieved through closed, semi-open, open tip rhinoplasty after primary cleft lip repair. Methodology: Protocol was registered on the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews. PRISMA-P guidelines for the conduct of systematic review were followed. Literature search was done in various databases. The inclusion criteria were patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip undergoing rhinoplasty with primary cleft lip repair and preference given to studies comparing the 3 procedures. Results: Sixteen articles were selected based on inclusion criteria after screening 522 articles—1 randomized controlled trial, 2 retrospective cohorts, and 13 case series. Both closed and open techniques have achieved good symmetry of nostrils with no impairment of growth. No advantage of one technique over the other was noted. Conclusion: There is a paucity of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies on the subject to arrive at an evidence-based recommendation as to whether open or closed rhinoplasty during primary cleft lip repair gives better long-term outcomes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alpysbaev, K. S., Djuraev, A. M., & Tapilov, E. A. (2021). Reconstructive and restorative interventions at the proximal end of the thigh and pelvic bones in destructive pathological dislocation of the hip in children after hematogenous osteomyelitis. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(4), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v4n4.1779

Berghaus A: Rhinoplasty: open or closed technique? HNO 2010, 58(9):878–881.

Bhoo-Chai K (1987) Primary repair of the unilateral cleft lip nose in the oriental: a 20 year follow up. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:185–194.

Han SK, Woo HS, Kim WK: Extended incision in open-approach rhinoplasty for asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109(6):2087–2096.

Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011.

LaRossa Don, Donath Gary (1993) Primary nasoplasty in unilateral and bilateral cleft nasal deformity. Clin Plast Surg 20(4):781–791.

Lu TC, Lam WL, Chang CS, Chen PKT. Primary correction of nasal deformity in unilateral incomplete cleft lip: a comparative study between three techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65(4):456-463.

Marimuthu M, Bonanthaya K, Shetty P, Wahab A. Open versus closed rhinoplasty with primary cheiloplasty: a comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013;12(3):289-296.

McComb H (1985) Primary correction of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: a 10 year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:791–797.

Quatela VC, Jacono AA: Structural grafting in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2002, 18(4):223–232.

Spencer LSB, Buzzo CL. Primary treatment of lip and nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2017; 32(1):37-45.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Tang PM, Chao NS, Leung MW, Liu KW. Changes in nasal configuration following primary rhinoplasty: direct anthropometric measurement in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):557-561.

Trott JA, Mohan N (1993) A preliminary report on open tip rhinoplasty at the time of lip repair in unilateral cleft lip and palate: the alor setar experience. Br J Plast Surg 46:363–370.

Yasonov SA, Lopatin AV, Kugushev AY. Primary rhinocheiloplasty: comparison of open and closed methods of alar cartilage reposition. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016;6(1):21-24.

Published

25-08-2022

How to Cite

Amrutha, V. K., Jaiswal, R. K., Sharma, A., & Krishna, L. K. (2022). Comparison of nasal symmetry in closed, semi-open and open tip rhinoplasty following primary cleft lip repair: Systematic review and meta analysis. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 10228–10233. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.12147

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)