Method, types and frequency of formative assessment in competency learning: Student view

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.12248

Authors

  • Swaroop Chand Bhansali Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, GIMSR, GITAM, Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Ragam Ravi Sunder Professor & HOD, Department of Physiology, GIMSR, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Nachiket Shankar Professor, Department of Anatomy, St. John Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Perugu Balananda Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, GIMSR, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

formative assessment, phase 1 MBBS students, GIMSR, GITAM

Abstract

Background: Formative evaluation is a range of formal assessment employed by professors during the teaching process in order to modify curriculum activities, to improve student attainment. Since the implementation of Competency Based Medical Education students need to adopt a deep learning approach contrary to traditional learning. We were interested to get their views about formative assessment. Objective: To explore perception of number and types of formative assessment by phase 1 students. Methods: To collect data from a pre validated questionnaire from Phase 1 MBBS students of 3 medical colleges and analyze it, regarding the formative evaluation.  Results: 43 to 71 percent felt that frequency of formative assessment was optimal.   61 to 67 percent felt that quantity of portions for the formative assessment tests was optimal. 57 to 72 percent felt that formative assessment motivated them to study regularly.58 to 67 percent of students feel that the level of difficulty of the questions was optimal.59 to 66 percent of students feel that periodic formative assessment tests improved their learning of the pre-clinical subjects. Conclusions: Formative assessment helps them in learning as well as preparing for summative assessment. Formative assessment helps in keeping them motivated to study regularly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

abarca J, Figueroa C, Huidobro B, Wright AC, Riquelme A, Moreno R. [Perception of medical students about formative assessments during clinical courses]. Rev Med Chil. 2014 Sep;142(9) 1193-1199. doi:10.4067/s0034-98872014000900014. PMID: 25517060.

accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(5):103- 11.

Anwar, Masood and Fahd Mudassar Hameed. “Students' Perceptions towards Formative and Summative Assessment: A Single Institution Study -.” Journal of Islamic International

Anwar, Masood and Fahd Mudassar Hameed. “Students' Perceptions towards Formative and Summative Assessment: A Single Institution Study -.” Journal of Islamic International Medical College 11 (2016): 35-40.

Anwar, Masood and Fahd Mudassar Hameed. “Students' Perceptions towards Formative and Summative Assessment: A Single Institution Study -.” Journal of Islamic International Medical College 11 (2016): 35-40.

Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback.Med Educ. 2010;44(1):101-108. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x

Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. General competencies and

Derouza E, Fleming M: A comparison of in-class quizzes vs. online quizzes on student exam performance. J Comput High Educ. 2003, 14: 121-134.

Epstein RM. Assessment in Medical Education. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 387-96.

Gandamayu, I. B. M., Antari, N. W. S., & Strisanti, I. A. S. (2022). The level of community compliance in implementing health protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n2.1897

K. Medical students' perception of the reliability, usefulness and feasibility of unproctored online formative assessment tests. Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Mar 1;45(1):84-88. doi:10.1152/advan.00178.2020. PMID: 33529145.

Medical College 11 (2016): 35-40.

Ogange, Betty & Agak, John & Okelo, Kevin & Kiprotich, Peter. (2018). Student perception of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment. Open Praxis. 10. 29. 10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.705.

Relan A, Uijdehaage S: Web-based assessment for students' testing and self monitoring. Acad Med. 2001; 76 (5): 551

Robyn Preston, Monica Gratani, Kimberley Owens, Poornima Roche, Monika Zimanyi & Bunmi Malau-Aduli (2020) Exploring the Impact of Assessment on Medical Students’ Learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45:1, 109-124, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614145

Schuwirth, L. W., and C. P. van der Vleuten. 2004. “Merging Views on Assessment.” Medical Education 38:1208–1210. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2929.2004.02055.x.

Sharma S, Sharma V, Sharma M, Awasthi B, Chaudhary S. Formative assessment in postgraduate medical education - Perceptions of students and teachers. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Aug;5(Suppl 1):S66-70. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.162282. PMID: 26380215; PMCID: PMC4552070.

Snekalatha S, Marzuk SM, Meshram SA, Maheswari KU, Sugapriya G, Sivasharan

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Published

28-08-2022

How to Cite

Bhansali, S. C., Sunder, R. R., Shankar, N., & Balananda, P. (2022). Method, types and frequency of formative assessment in competency learning: Student view. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 8156–8163. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.12248

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)