A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of directly bonded brackets using three varieties of light cure systems

An in-vitro study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.12487

Authors

  • Hitesh Ramdas Sawant Assistant Professor, Dept. of Orthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai
  • Parag Vishnu Gangurde Professor and Head of Department, Dept. of Orthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai
  • Anjali Gourishankar Gheware Professor, Dept. of Orthodontics, MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai
  • Shashank Sharad Gaikwad Professor, Dept. of Orthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai
  • Nityanand Shankar Shetty Assistant Professor, Dept. of Orthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai

Keywords:

shear bond strength, halogen light cure system, low intensity LED, high intensity LED

Abstract

Context: Using Visible Light to bond orthodontic attachments is now an accepted norm, the progression being  Halogens, Low and High Intensity Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs). Since, clinical use of bonded brackets is pragmatically linked with Shear Bond Strength (SBS) and chair-side time, adhesives with shorter curing time are a boon. Hence, the aforementioned facets bear a more detailed study. Settings and Design: 6 Groups (2 Halogens, 2 Low Intensity LEDs and 2 High Intensity LEDs); Each Group comprised of 10 assemblies of Metal Brackets (3M Unitek, Gemini Series) bonded to facial surface of extracted human Maxillary 1st bicuspids. Methods and Material: Brackets were directly bonded using Standard Bonding Protocol to freshly extracted Human Maxillary Premolars. Shear Bond Strength (SBS) testing was done using Universal Testing Machine, Instron. The SBS values attained in Kg/F were converted into MPa and results subjected to a comparative evaluation. Results: Mean SBS values, in MPa, for Halogen Light Cure Systems were 8.51 and 8.86; for Low Intensity LEDs were 10.50 and 10.33 while for High Intensity LEDs 15.54 and 13.85. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Oonsombat C. Evaluation of a new curing light on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2003;73:431–5.

Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Polymerization of orthodontic resin cement with light-emitting diode curing units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:236–1.

Farfán, R. F. M., Zambrano, T. Y. M., Badillo, F. R. A., & Solís, A. A. H. (2020). Design and construction of an industrial ship conditioning system. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijpse.v4n1.423

Krishnaswamy NR, Sunitha C. Light-emitting diode vs halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets. A 15-month clinical study of bond failures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007: 132:518-3.

Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhaes DV, Bagnato VS. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED based devices. Dent Mat 2001;17:309 5.

Mills RW, Jandt KD, Asworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting (LED) technology. Br Dent J 1999;186:388 1.

Mirabella D, Spena R, Scognamiglio G, Luca L, Gracco A, Siciliani G. LED vs halogen light-curing of adhesive-precoated brackets. Angle Orthod 2008;78:935–0.

Oberholzer TG, Makofane ME, Preez I, George R. Modern high powered led curing lights and their effect on pulp chamber temperature of bulk and incrementally cured composite resin. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;20:50-5.

Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171-8.

Silta YT, Dunn WJ, Peters CB. Effect of shorter polymerization times when using the latest generation of light emitting diodes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128: 744–8.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

Tanya, T., Dandekeri, S., Shetty, S., Mohammed, Z., Mohammed, F., Ragher, M., & Hegde, S. (2022). Effect of silanization on shear bond strength between high translucency zirconia and resin cement: An in-vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 6801–6815. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6438

Usumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI. Effect of light emitting diode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2004:38:385-7.

Verma P. Curing efficiency of three light emitting diodes at different curing profiles. Indian J Dent Res 2016; 27:168-3

Ward J, Wolf B, Leite L, Zhou J. Clinical effect of reducing curing times with high-intensity LED lights. Angle Orthod 2015;85:1064-9.

Ward J, Wolf B, Leite L, Zhou J. Clinical effects of reducing Curing time with high-intensity LED lights. Angle Orthod 2015;85:1064–9.

Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:515–0.

Published

04-09-2022

How to Cite

Sawant, H. R., Gangurde, P. V., Gheware, A. G., Gaikwad, S. S., & Shetty, N. S. (2022). A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of directly bonded brackets using three varieties of light cure systems: An in-vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 2463–2473. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.12487

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)