Development of artificial intelligence indicator for elementary students
Keywords:
indicator, artificial intelligence (AI), elementary studentsAbstract
This research aimed to develop the Artificial Intelligence (AI) indicator for elementary students by synthesizing the components of artificial intelligence learning for elementary students which is designed to be aware of the issue of mental health of children as well. The results were assessed for appropriateness by five experts. Findings demonstrated that the indicator consisted of five aspects ordering by the complex from Grade 1 to 5. Firstly, it was Perception which the student could explain the origin of interaction between the AI and human by designing a reception system to conduct perception and response,and draw the response diagram. Secondly, it was Representation & Reasoning which the student could explain the reasoning algorithm of the AI. Thirdly, it was Machine Learning which the student could explain the machine learning, criticize the input data defect. Fourthly, the Natural interaction, which the student could justify the purpose of data trending and improvement of AI to be more natural by creating a realistic response system. Lastly, it was the Societal Impact which the student could suggest the solution to AI system problems to be more accurate and appropriate with the fewest impact on humans and facilitate human living efficiently.
Downloads
References
Alberola, J. M., Del Val, E., Sanchez-Anguix, V., Palomares, A., & Teruel, M. D. (2016). An artificial intelligence tool for heterogeneous team formation in the classroom. Knowledge- Based Systems, 101, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.knosys.2016.02.010
Ali, S., Payne, B. H., Williams, R., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2019, June). Constructionism, ethics, and creativity: Developing primary and middle school artificial intelligence education. In International Workshop on Education in Artificial Intelligence K-12 (EDUAI'19) (pp. 1-4). http://robotic.media.mit.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2019/08/Constructionism__Ethics__and_Creativity.pdf
Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Huang, B. (2020, August). Factors Influencing Students' Behavioral Intention to Continue Artificial Intelligence Learning. In 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 147-150). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00040
Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for the modelling of Chinese secondary school students’ intention to learn Artificial Intelligence. Mathematics, 8(11), 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089
Dzikovska, M., Steinhauser, N., Farrow, E., Moore, J., & Campbell, G. (2014). BEETLE II: Deep natural language understanding and automatic feedback generation for intelligent tutoring in basic electricity and electronics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 284-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0017-9
Goldstein, I., & Papert, S. (1977). Artificial intelligence, language, and the study of knowledge. Cognitive science, 1(1), 84-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(77)80006-2
Heinze, C. A., Haase, J., & Higgins, H. (2010, July). An action research report from a multi-year approach to teaching artificial intelligence at the k-6 level. In First AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/EAAI/EAAI10/paper/viewPaper/1746
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf
Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016, October). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570
Khachatryan, G. A., Romashov, A. V., Khachatryan, A. R., Gaudino, S. J., Khachatryan, J. M., Guarian, K. R., & Yufa, N. V. (2014). Reasoning Mind Genie 2: An intelligent tutoring system as a vehicle for international transfer of instructional methods in mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 333-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0019-7
Klassner, F., & Anderson, S. D. (2003). Lego MindStorms: Not just for K-12 anymore. IEEE robotics & automation magazine, 10(2), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1109 /MRA.2003.1213611
Langley, P. (2019, July). An integrative framework for artificial intelligence education. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 9670-9677). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019670
Lenat, D. B., & Durlach, P. J. (2014). Reinforcing math knowledge by immersing students in a simulated learning-by-teaching experience. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 216-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0016-x
Malik, G., Tayal, D. K., & Vij, S. (2019). An analysis of the role of artificial intelligence in education and teaching. In Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques (pp. 407-417). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8639-7_42
McCalla, G. (2000). The fragmentation of culture, learning, teaching and technology: implications for the artificial intelligence in education research agenda in 2010. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(2), 177-196. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.100.7762&rep=rep1&typ=pdf
Ner, R. H. (2020). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence. Evolution, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-612
Ouariachi, T., Li, C. Y., & Elving, W. J. (2020). Gamification approaches for education and engagement on pro-environmental behaviors: Searching for best practices. Sustainability, 12(11), 4565. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114565
Pareto, L. (2014). A teachable agent game engaging primary school children to learn arithmetic concepts and reasoning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 251-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0018-8
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., & Pardos, Z. (2014). How should intelligent tutoring systems sequence multiple graphical representations of fractions? A multi-methods study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(2), 125-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0011-7
Saragih, J. M., Lucey, S., & Cohn, J. F. (2011). Deformable model fitting by regularized landmark mean-shift. International journal of computer vision, 91(2), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-010-0380-4
Stepanets, I., Bieliaiev, S., Mordovtseva, N., Ilina, O., & Potapova, N. (2022). Pedagogical foundations of the problem of forming communicative competence of future elementary school teachers. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n2.8772
Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938
Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: educational cobots and smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y
Toivonen, T., Jormanainen, I., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., Valtonen, T., & Vartiainen, H. (2020, July). Co-designing machine learning apps in k–12 with primary school children. In 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 308-310). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00099
Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019, July). Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI?. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 9795-9799). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795
Wartawan, P. G. (2017). The effectiveness of the use of portfolio assessment by controlling prior knowledge to enhance scientific attitude among senior high school students. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 1(3), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijpse.v1i3.54
Xiao, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). Assessment of optimal pedagogical factors for Canadian ESL learners’ reading literacy through artificial intelligence algorithms. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n4p1
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
