Israeli-Palestinian struggle

A critical discourse analysis

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.12928

Authors

  • Mubdir Shihab Ahmed Open educational college, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Teiseer Mohammed Abed Isra’a University, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Karama Hassan Hussain College of Education, Baghdad, Iraq

Keywords:

Palestinians, Israelis, struggle, ideology, discourse analysis

Abstract

This study investigates how the struggle between Israelis and Palestinians is represented in the western news discourse through building a relationship between language and ideology. The study provides a picture of how Palestinians are depicted in the West. To achieve this aim, extracts from six articles of two western newspapers, namely the Independent from U.K and the Washington Post from U.S from the period between 2001-2012 are selected and analyzed ideologically and linguistically. The study is carried out using Van Dijk's notion of "ideological square", categorized by Us vs. Them dichotomies using qualitative and quantitative procedures. The study has concluded that Palestinians are absolutely portrayed negatively in the western newspapers. They are explicitly or implicitly seen as fighters, suicide bombers, Islamic militants, kidnappers and terrorists, which reflect their danger as compared to the Israelis. The conclusions have also proved that the two newspapers have revealed similar attitudes toward Palestinians and almost used similar language to describe them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artz, L. W. and Pollock, M. A. (1997). Limiting the options: Anti-Arab images in U.S. media coverage of the Persian Gulf crisis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Bloor, M. and Bloor, T. (2007). The practice of critical discourse analysis: an introduction. London: Hodder Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, N., and Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: discourse studies 2 (A multidisciplinary introduction). London: Sage.

Ghareeb, E. (1983). Split vision: The portrayal of Arabs in the American media. Washington D.C.: American-Arab Affairs Council.

Jahedi, M., and Abdullah, S. F. (2014). The ideological construction of Iran in The NYT. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32(3)

Mousa, I. (2000). The making of the media in the West. In L. A. Gher & H. Y. Amin (Eds.), Civic discourse and digital age communication in the Middle East.

Shaheen, J. G. (1984). The TV Arab. Bowling Green, Oh: Bowling Green University Press.

Simpson, P. (2004). Language and power: a resource book for student. USA: Routledge.

Stockton, R. (1994). Ethnic archetypes and the Arab image. In E. McCarus (Ed.), The development of Arab-American identity. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Suleiman, M. W. (1988). The Arabs in the mind of America. Battleboro, VT: Amana Books.

Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage.

Van Dijk, T.A. (2007). ‘Comments on context and conversation’. In N. Fairclough, G. Cortese & P. Ardizzone (Eds.) Discourse and contemporary social change. Bern: Peter Lang.

Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

Weiss, G., and Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2002). Critical discourse analysis theory and interdisciplinarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In Östman & Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. John Benjamins.

Published

22-09-2022

How to Cite

Ahmed, M. S., Abed, T. M., & Hussain, K. H. (2022). Israeli-Palestinian struggle: A critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 3676–3688. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.12928

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles