Comparison of the dynamic HIP screw to PFN (proximal femoral nail) for unstable peri trochanteric femur fracture
Keywords:
Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), femoral fracture, Proximal Femoral Nail, Modified Harris Hip Score, Peri-trochanteric FracturesAbstract
Introduction: One of the most common fractures in the elderly is inter-trochanteric fractures where surgical management allows better functional and rehabilitation outcomes making it a treatment of choice. Aim: To compare radiological, functional, and clinical outcomes following treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures using dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femur nail (PFN). Methods: The study assessed 120 subjects with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures where 60 were treated with DHS and the other 60 with PFN. For assessment of the outcomes, Harris hip scores were used. Results: Most surgeries were done in 56-70 minutes in 30% (n=18) subjects and 37% (n=22) subjects in DHS and PFN group respectively which was statistically non-significant with p=0.86. Most common complication was lateral cortex shattering in 16.6% (n=10) study subjects followed by ill-fitting jig in 13.3% (n=8) study subjects and distal locking difficulty in 10% (n=6) study subjects respectively. Mean Harris hip score was higher in PFN group (83.5±2.38) compared to DHS group (82.1±2.32).
Downloads
References
Adeel K, Nadeem RD, Akhtar M, Sah RK, Mahy-Ud-Din I. Comparison of the proximal femoral nail (PFN) and dy¬namic hip screw (DHS) for the treatment of AO type A2 and A3 pertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Pak Med Assoc 2020;70:815-9.
Babhulkar SS. Management of trochanteric fractures. Indian J Orthop 2006;40:210-8.
Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C. Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 2001;25:298-301.
Dorotaka R, Schoechtner H, Buchingerw. The influence of im¬mediate surgical treatment to proximal femoral fractures on mortality and quality of life within six hours of the fracture ver¬sus late than six hours. J Bone Joint Surg 2003;85:1107-13
Gupta SKV, Valisetti VS. Comparative study between dynamic hip screw vs proximal femoral nailing in inter-trochanteric frac¬tures of the femur in adults, Int J Orthop Sci 2015;1:07-11.
Koval KJ, Chen AL, Aharonoff GB, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD. Clinical pathway for hip fractures in the elderly: the Hospital for Joint Diseases experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;4:72- 81.
Maniscalco P, Rivera F, D’Ascola J, Del Vecchio EO: Failure of intertrochanteric nailing due to distal nail jamming. J Orthop Traumatol 2013;14:71–7.
McCarus DC. Fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteopo¬rosis: A review of treatment options. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006;61:39-50.
Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelson O, Savolainen V, Hirven¬salo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screws or a proximal femoral nail: A randomized study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:76–81.
Pan X, Xiao D, Lin B, Huang G. Dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur in elderly patients. Chin J Orthop Trauma 200;6:785–9.
Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer W. Petrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail? A randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:386–93
Sengodan VC, Elangovan S, Kumar JS. Management of ipsi¬lateral fracture of hip and shaft of the femur. Int J Curr Res Rev 2017;07:7-14.
Windoff J, Hollander DA, Hakimi M, Linhart: Pitfalls & com¬plications in the use of proximal femoral nail. Lagenbecks Arch Aurg 2005;3901:234.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.








