Assessment of the acceptable length of right internal jugular central venous catheters for Indian population

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13024

Authors

  • Niveditha Department of Anaesthesia, KMC Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
  • Sunil B V Additional Professor, Anaesthesia, KMC Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
  • Sonal Bhat Department of Anaesthesia, KMC Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
  • Shaila Kamath Department of Anaesthesia, KMC Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal

Keywords:

central venous catheters, right internal jugular vein, repositioning of catheters

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters have been used in various lengths based on the height of the patient or predetermined lengths. This study compared the different lengths of right IJV central venous catheters to determine the better length for average heights of Indian population. Patients and Methods:  This was a prospective observational study done on 148 patients with average heights of Indian population (160±10cm) who are scheduled for right IJV central venous catheters are a part of this study. The patients are divided into 3 group (10,13,15 cm). Three different lengths of catheters are inserted. An anteroposterior chest X-ray was taken for the patients and carina was taken as the acceptable landmark. The outcome measured between the three groups is need for repositioning. Statistical analysis was done using Chi square test, Fisher’s exact test. Results: 10 cm catheters were considered acceptable in terms of less incidence of repositioning and statistically significant with p value of 0.0001(H S) with respect to other lengths (13,15cm) for heights of average Indian population. (160±10 cm). Conclusion: From our study, we concluded that 10 cm CVC catheters are acceptable in cannulating right IJV for an average Indian height adult patients (160±10 cms).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2003;348(12):1123–33.

Kim W, Kim WY, Lee CW, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Yoon JC, et al. Optimal insertion depth of central venous catheters - Is a formula required? A prospective cohort study. Injury. 2012;43(1):38–41.

Scott T Reeves,Lori A Beevis,Byron .N.Bailey.positioning a right atrial air aspiration catheter using echocardiography.

Schuster M, Nave H, Piepenbrock S, Pabst R, Panning B. The carina as a landmark in central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth. 2000;

Vesely TM. Central venous catheter tip position: A continuing controversy. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2003.

Chaskar V, Karnik PP, Dave NM, Garasia M. Comparative Study of Three Methods for Depth of Central Venous Catheter Placement in Children: An Observational Pilot Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2018; 46: 116-20.

Lum P. A New Formula-Based Measurement Guide for Optimal Positioning of Central Venous Catheters. J Assoc Vasc Access [Internet]. 2009;9(2):80–5

Walter L. Scott, Central Venous Catheters: An Overview of Food and Drug Administration Activities,Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America,Volume 4, Issue3, 1995,Pages 377-393.

Albrecht K, Nave H, Breitmeier D, Panning B, Tröger HD. Applied anatomy of the superior vena cava-the carina as a landmark to guide central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Jan;92(1):75-7.

Sivasubramaniam S, Hiremath M. Central venous catheters: Do we need to review practice on positioning? JICS 2008;9:228-31.

Kunizawa A, Fujioka M, Mink S, Keller E. Central venous catheter-induced delayed hydrothorax via progressive erosion of central venous wall Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Oct;76(10):868-71. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

Şahutoğlu C, Pestilci Z, Kocabaş S, Aşkar FZ, Sunal SÖ, Çevik AG. A venous catheter complication; venous perporation and lung injury. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Oct;42(5):270-2. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.64325. Epub 2014 Jul 9.PMID: 27366434

Ezri T, Weisenberg M, Sessler DI, Berkenstadt H, Elias S, Szmuk P, et al. Correct Depth of Insertion of Right Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheters Based on External Landmarks: Avoiding the Right Atrium. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(4):497–501.

Russell WC, Parker JL. Thirteen centimetre central venous catheters, lucky for all Anaesthesia. 2003 Apr;58(4):388. PMID: 12648125.

Mamidi RS, Kulkarni B, Singh A. Secular Trends in Height in Different States of India in Relation to Socioeconomic Characteristics and Dietary Intakes. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2011;32(1):23-34.

Kujur R, Rao MS, Mrinal M. How correct is the correct length for central venous catheter insertion. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):159-62.

Kim MC, Kim KS, Choi YK, Kim DS, Kwon MI, Sung JK et al. An estimation of right- and left-sided central venous catheter insertion depth using measurement of surface landmarks along the course of central veins. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1371-4.

Published

27-09-2022

How to Cite

Niveditha, N., Sunil, B. V., Bhat, S., & Kamath, S. (2022). Assessment of the acceptable length of right internal jugular central venous catheters for Indian population. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S9), 2711–2717. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13024

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles