Comparative evaluation of the tensile and compressive strength of three light cured bulk-filled composite core build up material

An in vivo study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13108

Authors

  • Samidha Madhukar Shinde Assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune
  • Premraj Jadhav Department of Prosthodontics, Professor and HOD, Yogita dental college and hospital, Khed
  • Aditi Amin Assistant professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ACPM Dental College Dhule
  • Alok Ranjan Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental college and hospital, Navi Mumbai
  • Nidhi Kirit Momaya Assistant Professor, Department of prosthodontics, Dr. D Y Patil dental college and hospital, Pimpri, Pune
  • Swapnil Kurhade Assistant Professor, Department of prosthodontics, D Y Patil Dental college and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune

Keywords:

comparative evaluation, tensile, compressive strength, bulk-filled composite

Abstract

Introduction- The loss of a considerable amount of tooth structure makes retention of subsequent restorations more problematic and increases likelihood of fracture during functional loading. Different clinical techniques are there, one such technique is post and core. An ideal core build- up material must present excellent mechanical properties to resist the stresses that may be produced during function, providing equitable stress distributions of forces and reducing probability of tensile and compressive failures. Recent developments in flowable and restorative composite resins have resulted in a greater total depth of cure—between 4 and 5 mm for some materials. Materials and Methods: study was conducted in the department of prosthodontics and crown and bridge, including implantology along with external laboratory support and molds for tensile and compressive strength were made. Result- Based on strength, Photocore and Multicore HB may be used as alternatives to Kerr Herculite Precise; however, other physical qualities should also be considered. Conclusion-Within limited data available on recent bulk fill material that is PLT, Kerr Herculite Precis more in vitro and in vivo studies should be held for long term success of the material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajlouni R, Ajlouni K, Denehy GE. Core buildup repair using a clear matrix: a case report and clinical technique. Operative dentistry. 2006 Feb;31(2):273-6.

Al-Sayed HD, Al-Resayes SS, Jamjoom FZ, Al-Sowygh ZH. The effect of various core build-up materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences. 2013 Jul 1;4(2):71- 5.

Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: A systematic review and clinical considerations. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015 Jun;9(6):ZE18.

Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1998 May 1;129(5):567-77.

Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of various core build‐up materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000 Mar;9(1):14-8.

Campillo M, Grondzik MJ. Evaluation of Physical Properties of Different Core Build-up Materials.

Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1999 Sep 1;82(3):272-6.

Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, VARGAS MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2000 Nov 1;131(11):1610-5.

Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clinical oral investigations. 2013 Jan 1;17(1):227- 35.

Didem A, Yalcin G. Comparative mechanical properties of bulk-fill resins. Open journal of composite materials. 2014 Apr 4;2014.

Iqbal M, Jayaprakash Thumu D, Hussain J, Rehan AD, Khan AM, Kadu MD. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FOUR RECENT CORE BUILDS UP MATERIALS: AN IN VITRO STUDY.

Jayanthi N, Vinod V. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and flexural strength of conventional core materials with nanohybrid composite resin core material an in vitro study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2013 Sep 1;13(3):281-9.

Kalmowicz J, Phebus JG, Owens BM, Johnson WW, King GT. Microleakage of class I and II composite resin restorations using a sonic-resin placement system. Operative dentistry. 2015 Nov;40(6):653-61.

KJ A. Phillips Science of dental materials 11th ed. St. Louis: Saunders. 2003:89- 90.

Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1992 Oct 1;68(4):584-90.

Kumar G, Shivrayan A. Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2015 Jan;6(1):16.

Kumar L, Pal B, Pujari P. An assessment of fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study. PeerJ. 2015 Feb 24;3:e795.

Passos SP, Freitas AP, Jumaily S, Santos MJ, Rizkalla AS, Santos Jr GC. Comparison of mechanical properties of five commercial dental core build-up materials. Compendium. 2013;34(1).

Petronijević B, Marković D, Šarčev I, Anđelković A, Knežević MJ. Fracture resistance of restored maxillary premolars. Contemporary Materials. 2012;2(3):219-25.

Shori D, Pandey S, Kubde R, Rathod Y, Atara R, Rathi S. To evaluate and compare the effect of different Post Surface treatments on the Tensile Bond Strength between Fiber Posts and Composite Resin. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2013 Oct;5(5):27.

Watanabe H, Khera SC, Vargas MA, Qian F. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites. Dental materials. 2008 Mar 1;24(3):418-25.

Yüzügüllü B, Çiftçi Y, Saygılı G, Canay Ş. Diametral tensile and compressive strengths of several types of core materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008 Feb;17(2):102-7.

Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dental Materials. 2006 Apr 1;22(4):382-7.

Published

29-09-2022

How to Cite

Shinde, S. M., Jadhav, P., Amin, A., Ranjan, A., Momaya, N. K., & Kurhade, S. (2022). Comparative evaluation of the tensile and compressive strength of three light cured bulk-filled composite core build up material: An in vivo study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 11192–11203. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13108

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)