Translation and validation study of the Hindi versions of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ-H)

Madhaw Dwivedi; Sanjay Gandhi; Sara Schroter; Kalpesh Gaur; Ramesh Patel; Mahendra Singh Rathore

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.13161

Authors

Madhaw Dwivedi
madhaw.dwivedi@geetanjaliuniversity.com
Pharm. D, Research Scholar, Geetanjali Institute of Pharmacy, Geetanjali University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Sanjay Gandhi M.Ch. (CTVS), Associate Professor & Head Department of CTVS,Cardiothoracic Surgeon, Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Sara Schroter Senior Researcher, BMJ, BMA House, Tavistock Square, WC1H9JR, London, United Kingdom
Kalpesh Gaur Ph.D, Professor & Supervisor (Pharmacology), Geetanjali Institute of Pharmacy, Geetanjali University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Ramesh Patel DM (Cardiology), Consultant Interventional Cardiologist, Geetanjali Cardiac Centre, Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Mahendra Singh Rathore Ph.D, Professor (Pharmacy Practice), Geetanjali Institute of Pharmacy, Geetanjali University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Keywords:

PTCA, CABG, HRQOL, CROQ-H

Abstract

Objectives: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient reported outcome measure. It is used to measure health related outcomes from the patient’s perspective before and after coronary revascularisation procedures (PTCA and CABG). This study involved the translation and validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire into Hindi language (CROQ-H). Methodology: The English version of the CROQ was translated into Hindi version; some terms were revised to, adjust for the sociocultural status of the Indian environment. Ten patients completed the questionnaire in a pilot to check for comprehension and, face validity. In the field study, subjects were recruited from Geetanjali Cardiac Centre (GCC), Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Geetanjali University, Udaipur, India. Questionnaires were self-administered. Analysis included acceptability, reliability (internal consistency and test–retest), validity (factor analysis, known-groups and responsiveness testing. Results: A total of 470 patients gave informed consent to participate and 391(83%) of these participated in field study. All versions were met pre-specified criteria; (1) acceptability of items (low missing data)); (2) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.70, item total correlations >0.30) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.70); (3) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency (Cronbach’s α >0.70).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleksic, N., Putnik, S., Schroter, S., Pavlovic, V., Bumbasirevic, U., Zlatkovic, M., ... &Maric, G. (2022). Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version. Quality of Life Research, 31(6), 1883-1895.

Ascione, R., Reeves, B. C., Taylor, F. C., Seehra, H. K., & Angelini, G. D. (2004). Beating heart against cardioplegic arrest studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): quality of life at mid-term follow-up in two randomised controlled trials. European heart journal, 25(9), 765-770.

Benzer, W., Höfer, S., & Oldridge, N. B. (2003). Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease after different treatments for angina in routine clinical practice. Herz, 28(5), 421-428.

Devlin, N. J., & Appleby, J. (2010). Getting the most out of PROMS. Putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision-making. London: The King's Fund.

Fernandez, R. S., Davidson, P., Salamonson, Y., Griffiths, R., & Juergens, C. (2007). The health-related quality of life trajectory in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 27(4), 223-226.

Gibbons, E., Casañasi Comabella, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2013). A structured review of patient‐reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013. British Journal of Dermatology, 168(6), 1176-1186.

Husted, J. A., Cook, R. J., Farewell, V. T., & Gladman, D. D. (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 53(5), 459-468.

Janzon, M., Levin, L. Å., & Swahn, E. (2004). Invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease promotes health-related quality of life: results from the FRISC II trial. American Heart Journal, 148(1), 114-121.

Kim, M., Seo, J., Hwang, J. Y., & Park, K. S. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 1-9.

Lillevik, S. A., Schroter, S., & Hanssen, T. A. (2018). Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17(1), 36-44.

Marquis, P., Fayol, C., & Joire, J. E. (1995). Clinical validation of a quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patients. European heart journal, 16(11), 1554-1560.

Norekvål, T. M., Fålun, N., & Fridlund, B. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes on the agenda in cardiovascular clinical practice. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 15(2), 108-111.

Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.

Rogers, C. A., Pike, K., Campbell, H., Reeves, B. C., Angelini, G. D., Gray, A., ... & Taggart, D. P. (2014). Coronary artery bypass grafting in high-RISk patients randomised to off-or on-Pump surgery: a randomised controlled trial (the CRISP trial). Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 18(44), v-xx.

Santos, J. J., Costa, T. A., Guilherme, J. H., Silva, W. C., Abentroth, L. R., Krebs, J. A., & Sotoriva, P. (2015). Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the Brazilian version of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 61(3), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.61.03.209

Schroter S, Miles R, Green S, Jackson M. Psychometric validation of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS coronary revascularization PROMs pilot. BMJ open. 2017 Feb 1;7(2):e015915.

Schroter, S., & Lamping, D. L. (2004). Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient-based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 90(12), 1460–1466. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.021899

Scientific Advisory Committee. (1995). Instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin, 3(4), 1-4.

Seki, S., Kato, N., Ito, N., Kinugawa, K., Ono, M., Motomura, N., ... & Kazuma, K. (2011). Translation and validation study of the Japanese versions of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-J). European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 10(1), 22-30.

Shahali, S. H., Shaterzadeh Yazdi, M. J., Goharpey, S. H., & Rahim, F. (2008). Reliability of the Persian version of coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire (CROQ) in cardiac patients undergoing CABG and PTCA procedures. J Clin Diagn Res, 2, 919-924.

Spertus, J. A., Dawson, J., Masoudi, F. A., Krumholz, H. M., Reid, K. J., Peterson, E. D., ... & Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium. (2006). Prevalence and predictors of angina pectoris one month after myocardial infarction. The American journal of cardiology, 98(3), 282-288.

Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonnell, M., &Fihn, S. D. (1995). Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 333-341.

Takousi, M. G., Schmeer, S., Manaras, I., Olympios, C. D., Fakiolas, C. N., Makos, G., & Troop, N. A. (2016). Translation, adaptation and validation of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire into Greek. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 15(2), 134-141.

Thompson, D. R., & Yu, C. M. (2003). Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: assessment tools. Health and quality of life outcomes, 1(1), 1-5.

Valenti, L., Lim, L., Heller, R. F., & Knapp, J. (1996). An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. Quality of Life Research, 5(1), 151-161.