Study of normal anatomy and variations in gall bladder

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13179

Authors

  • Nagashree M. V. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Sri Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, Nelamangala, Bangalore Rural
  • Chandragirish S. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chamarajanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Chamarajanagar
  • Raghavendra D. R. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chamarajanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Chamarajanagar
  • Chandrakala S. P. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chamarajanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Chamarajanagar
  • Vidya Shambhava Pare Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, KVG Medical College and Hospital, Sullia

Keywords:

gall bladder, normal anatomy, variations

Abstract

Background: The extra hepatic biliary apparatus consists of right and left hepatic ducts, common hepatic duct, gall bladder, cystic duct and common bile duct which collects and delivers the bile from liver to second part of duodenum. Anatomical variations of biliary tree occur with sufficient frequency to be of concern to the surgeons operating in this area. Identification of anatomical details is necessary for accurate detailing of biliary tree to avoid inadvertent damage to biliary ductal system. Objective: To study the normal anatomy and variations of gall bladder by dissection method. Methods: In the present study a total number of 50 adult human livers with lesser Omentum, duodenum and pancreas were collected from the dissected cadavers from the department of anatomy KVG Medical College Sullia and Chamarajanagar institute of medical sciences, Chamarajanagar. The various parameters of the gall bladder and biliary ductal system were recorded and photographed. Observations and results: The following variations were observed in the present study. Hartmann’s pouch was observed in 42% (21/50).  Hourglass GB was observed in 2% (1/50).  Folded fundus was observed in 2% (1/50). Intrahepatic GB was observed in 4%. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Audi P, Noronha F, Rodrigues J. Intra hepatic gall bladder: a case report and review of literature. The internet journal of surgery. 2010;24(1).

Benson A, Page RE. A Preactical reappraisal of the anatomy of the extrahepatic bile ducts and arteries. Br J Surg. 1976;63:853-60.

Blugmart LH, Hann LE. Surgical and Radiological Anatomy of Liver, Biliary tract and Pancreas. In: Blugmart LH editor. Surgery of Liver, Biliary tract and Pancreas. 4th ed. (vol.1).Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier;2007. p. 11-16.

Chistia F, Ashok S, Shakuntala PR, Pritha BS, Gangane SD, Shashi W, et al. editors. Abdomen In: Clinically oriented anatomy. 6th ed. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer; 2009. p. 286.

de Csepel J, Carroccio A, Pomp A. Soft tissue images. “Phrygian cap” gall bladder. Can J Surg. 2003;46(1):50-1.

Eisendrath DN. Anomalies of the bile ducts and blood vessels as the cause of accidents in biliary surgery. JAMA. 1918;71:864-7.

Nagral S. Anatomy relevant to Cholecystectomy. J.Min Access Surg. 2005;1:53-8.

Neil BR. Gall bladder and biliary tree. In: Susan S, Patrica C, Alan CR, Michael GA, Jermiah HC, David J, et al. editors. Gray’s Anatomy the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40thed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008. p. 1178.

Niladri KM. Septate gall bladder: Gross and histological prospectives in an uncommon occurrence. IJAV. 2010;3:70-72.

Norton GJ, Gustav P. Diseases of gall bladder and bile ducts. In: Eugene B, Anthony FS, Dennis KL, Stephen HL, Dan LL, Larry JJ, et al. editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 15th ed. (vol. 2) New York: McGraw Hill; 2001. p.1777-84.

Oddsdottir M, Thai HP, Hunter JG. Gallbladder and Extra Hepatic Biliary System. In: Brunicardi FC editor. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 9th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill; p. 1136-38.

Orava S, Leiviska T. Hypoplasia and Aplasia of the gall bladder, A report of two cases. Acta Chir Scand 138.1971;420-24.

Patel NR, Joshipura VP, Haribhakti SP, Soni HN. Septate gall bladder in laparoscopic era. J Min Access Surg. 2008;1:20-2.

Russell RCG. The gall bladder and bile ducts. In: Russell RCG, Norman WS, Christopher BJK, editors. Bailey & Love’s short practice of surgery. 24th ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2004. p. 1101-2.

Schofield A, Hankins J, Sutherland F. A case of cholecystohepatic duct with atrophic common hepatic duct. HPB(Oxford). 2003;5(4):261-3.

Sheng LH, Taiyc, Tung LH, Cheuk KS, Allan MC, Concejero, et al. Left sided gall bladder: its clinical significance and imaging presentations. World J of Gastroenterol. 2007;13(47):6404-9.

Sing G, Bhandari RK, Saini DS. Double gall bladder and accessory hepatic duct: a case report. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2002;12:231-2.

Sinnatomby CS. The Abdamen. In: Sinnatomby CS, Horne T, Kenner H. editors. Last’s Anatomy. Regional and Applied. 11th ed. London: Elsevier; 2006. p. 273-6.

Sofi AA, Alaradi OH, Abouljoud M and Nawras AT. Aberrant Right Hepatic Duct Draining into the Cystic Duct: Clinical Outcomes and Management. Gastroenterol Res Pract.2011;2011:458915.

Tamol L, Kimaporan K, Vijarabhongse B. The anatomical variations of cystic duct in north east Thai population. The Thai Journal of Surgery. 2005;26(3).

Vijayaraghavan R, Belagavi CS. Double gall bladder with different disease entities: a case report. J Min Access Surg. 2006;2(1):23-6

Published

01-10-2022

How to Cite

Nagashree, M. V., Chandragirish, S., Raghavendra, D. R., Chandrakala, S. P., & Pare, V. S. (2022). Study of normal anatomy and variations in gall bladder. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 11479–11491. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13179

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles