Comparative study of percutaneous (perianal) instillation of aqueous jelly & percutaneous (perianal) gadolinium instillation in MR fistulography with its surgical correlation

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13298

Authors

  • Satish D. Patil Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research center - BLDE University (DU), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
  • Vishal Nimbal Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research center - BLDE University (DU), Vijayapur, Karnataka India
  • Shivanand V. Patil Professor, Department of Radiology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research center - BLDE University (DU), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
  • Prakruti Patil PG Student, Department of Radiology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research center - BLDE University (DU), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

MR fistulography, aqueous jelly, gadolinium

Abstract

Background: Perianal fistula is an abnormal tract connecting the anal canal and the perianal skin. Precise delineation of the tracts is necessary before surgery to know the anatomical details in order to prevent recurrences and incontinence. We studied the efficacy of percutaneous (perianal) instillation of aqueous jelly versus percutaneous (perianal) gadolinium instillation on magnetic resonance (MR) fistulography and compared to intra-operative findings. Materials and Methods: All patients with suspected peri-anal fistula showing external opening and active perianal discharge, who were sent for MR fistulography. MR fistulography with aqueous jelly instillation of perianal external opening was done on day 1, MR fistulogram with percutaneous (perianal) instillation of gadolinium contrast was performed next day which were correlated surgically. Results: A total of 30 patients underwent MR fistulogram with both modalities, of which, 28 of them underwent surgery. Out of the 28 patients with intra-operative primary tract, all 28 were identified to have the primary tract. Secondary tract identification by aqueous jelly instillation showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 55.5%, 100%, 100%, 82.6%, and 85.7% respectively. Secondary tract identification by gadolinium instillation showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of  77.7%, 100%, 100%, 90.4%, and 92.8% respectively. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggarwal R, Soni BK, Kumar JU, George RA, Sivasankar R. MR fistulography with percutaneous instillation of aqueous jelly: A cost effective technique innovation. The Indian journal of radiology & imaging. 2017 Apr;27(2):161.

Alaat El Essawy MT (2013) Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of Anorectal Fistulae and its Role in Management. J Gastroint Dig Syst 3:139

Gage KL, Deshmukh S, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Zaheer A. MRI of perianal fistulas: bridging the radiological–surgical divide. Abdominal imaging. 2013 Oct 1;38(5):1033-42.

Hori M, Oto A, Orrin S, Suzuki K, Baron RL. Diffusion‐weighted MRI: A new tool for the diagnosis of fistula in ano. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009 Nov;30(5):1021-6.

Khera PS, Badawi HA, Afifi AH. MRI in perianal fistulae. The Indian journal of radiology & imaging. 2010 Feb;20(1):53.

Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics. 2000 Mar;20(3):623-35.

Published

21-12-2021

How to Cite

Patil, S. D., Nimbal, V., Patil, S. V., & Patil, P. (2021). Comparative study of percutaneous (perianal) instillation of aqueous jelly & percutaneous (perianal) gadolinium instillation in MR fistulography with its surgical correlation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 11692–11701. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13298

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)