Socket shield technique versus conventional immediate implant placement in thin buccofacial bone to evaluate buccal bone resorption

A randomized controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13351

Authors

  • Abdullah Abdou Mattar PhD candidate at Department of Oral Medicineand Periodontology , faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Mona Aly Shoaib Professor emeritus at the Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Cairo University
  • Hany El Nahass Assistant Professor at the Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Cairo University
  • Hakem El Sayed Professor and Head of Department of the Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, MSA University Egypt

Keywords:

Thin buccal bone, Socket shield technique, Immediate implant, Esthetics, Buccal root aspect

Abstract

Objectives: The alveolar ridge resorbs and collapses following tooth removal which continues to be a major concern for practitioners. Many researchers concluded that buccal aspect of the ridge is more prone to resorption, as it is primarily supplied by the periodontal tissues and ligaments of the tooth1. Recently, several papers were published concerning the socket shield technique explaining how to maintain the ridge width and height. Socket shield technique aids at retaining the buccal fragment of root in place thus placing the implant behind the lingual aspect of that fragment so as aid in preventing the collapsing of the buccal bone. This would help in improving aesthetics especially during immediate implant placement in the anterior maxillary region (schroop et al, 2003). Materials and Methods: The patient passed through phase I therapy (Supragingival scaling, subgingival debridement and oral hygiene instructions) before any surgical procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hürzeler M. (2015). The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clinical Implant Dent Relat Res.;17(1):71-82.

Chen CL, Pan YH. (2013). Socket Shield Technique for Ridge Preservation: A Case Report. J Prosthondontics Implantology.;2(2):16-21.

Cherel F, Etienne D. (2014). Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int.;45(1):23

Filippi A, Pohl Y, von Arx T. (2001). Decoronation of an ankylosed tooth for preservation of alveolar bone prior to implant placement. Dent Traumatol.;17(2):93-5.

Gluckman H, Du Toit J. (2015). The management of recession midfacial to immediately placed implants in the aesthetic zone. Int Dent Africa Ed.;10 (1):6-9.

Hurzeler MB. (2010), The socket-shield technique: a proof-ofprinciple report, J Clinical Periodontology; 37: 855– 862

Malmgren B, Cvek M, Lundberg M, Frykholm A. (1984). Surgical treatment of ankylosed and infrapositioned reimplanted incisors in adolescents. Scand J Dent Res.;92(5):391-9.

Morrow RM, Feldman EE, Rudd KD, Trovillion HM. (1969). Tooth-supported complete dentures: an approach to preventive prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent.;21:513-22.

Miller PA. Complete dentures supported by natural teeth. (1958). J Prosthet Dent.;8:924-8

Ogata y.et al. (2013). Comparison of double flap incisions to 11. periosteal releasing incision for flap advancement: a prospective clinical trial. International journal of oral and maxillofacial implant, 28, pp 597- 604. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527365

Puneet Wadhwani et al. (2015). Socket Shield Technique: A New Concept of Ridge Preservation, Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 2

Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. (2007). Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.;27(6):521-7.

Schropp, l., wenzel, a. kostopoulos, l., & karring, t. (2003). Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. international journal of periodontics and restorative dentistry, 23(4), 313-324

Published

11-10-2022

How to Cite

Mattar, A. A., Shoaib, M. A., El Nahass, H., & El Sayed, H. (2022). Socket shield technique versus conventional immediate implant placement in thin buccofacial bone to evaluate buccal bone resorption: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S9), 3482–3490. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13351

Issue

Vol. 6 No. S9 (2022)

Section

Peer Review Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC