Get cognitively fatigued and be more confident! The effect of working memory capacity and cognitive load on meta-reasoning
Keywords:
intermediate judgment of confidence, working memory capacity, cognitive load, meta-reasoningAbstract
The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of cognitive limitations on intermediate judgments of confidence as one of the meta-reasoning components. This experimental study was conducted with 384 participants who were randomly assigned to two groups with different cognitive loads. The main task at the target level was the Tower of Hanoi, where the participants reported the level of their intermediate judgment of confidence every 45 seconds via a computerized questionnaire that popped up during the problem-solving process. The visual-spatial working memory capacity of individuals was measured with a forward and backward computerized Corsi block-tapping task. The participants in the high cognitive load group performed the dot matrix task before the Tower of Hanoi task. Two-way ANOVA found a link between the additional cognitive load before the main task and the participant's intermediate judgment of confidence during the problem-solving process. Visual-spatial working memory, on the other hand, did not have a significant effect on intermediate judgments of confidence, either alone or in conjunction with additional cognitive load.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(8), 607-617.
Ahadi, F., & Soleimani, M. (2014). Comparing the effect of two teaching methods by presenting a completely solved educational example. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14(4), 291-302.
Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731-3736.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual review of psychology, 63, 1-29.
Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2020). Advancing the specification of dual process models of higher cognition: A critical test of the hybrid model view. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 1-30.
Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological bulletin, 130(4), 553.
Barrouillet, P., Lépine, R., & Camos, V. (2008). Is the influence of working memory capacity on high-level cognition mediated by complexity or resource-dependent elementary processes?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 528-534.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of consciousness studies, 2(3), 200-219.
Clark, M. S., Milberg, S., & Erber, R. (1984). Effects of arousal on judgments of others' emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 551.
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework New York: Oxford University Press.
De Neys, W., (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological science, 17(5), 428-433.
Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(10), 454-459.
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on psychological science, 8(3), 223-241.
Feeney, A., & Thompson, V. A. (Eds.). (2015). Reasoning as memory. Psychology Press.
Folwarczny, M., Kaczmarek, M. C., Doliński, D., & Szczepanowski, R. (2018). Emotional see-saw affects rationality of decision-making: Evidence for metacognitive impairments. Acta psychologica, 186, 126-132.
Grimaldi, P., Lau, H., & Basso, M. A. (2015). There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 88-97.
Gwizdka, J. (2010, August). Using stroop task to assess cognitive load. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 219-222).
Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2003). The role of working memory in problem solving. The psychology of problem solving, 176-206.
Jaeger, A. J., Shipley, T. F., & Reynolds, S. J. (2017). The roles of working memory and cognitive load in geoscience learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 506-518.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist, 58(9), 697.
Kemps, E. (2001). Complexity effects in visuo-spatial working memory: Implications for the role of long-term memory. Memory, 9(1), 13-27.
Khodadadi, M., & Amani, H. (2018). Corsi spatial-visual working memory test [Software]. Institute for behavioral and cognitive sciences, Tehran, Iran. https://www.sinapsycho.com/Shop/Product/1319
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational psychology review, 21(1), 31-42.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A literature review. Always learning: Pearson research report, 24.
Larner, A. J. (2021). Functional Cognitive Disorders (FCD): How Is Metacognition Involved?. Brain Sciences, 11(8), 1082.
Manstead, A. S. R., Wagner, H. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (1983). A contrast effect in judgments of own emotional state. Motivation and Emotion, 7(3), 279-290.
Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. MIT press.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 130(4), 621.
Muncer, G., Higham, P., Gosling, C., Cortese, S., Wood-Downie, H., & Hadwin, J. A. (2021). A Meta-Analysis Investigating the Association Between Metacognition and Math Performance in Adolescence. Educational Psychology Review.
Nazari, M.A.& Nabizadeh Chianeh, Q. (2012). Checking the validity and reliability of Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) Scale. Journal of Research in Psychological Health, 6(2).
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Pouget, A. JDrugowitsch, and A. Kepecs. 2016.“Confidence and Certainty: Distinct Probabilistic Quantities for Different Goals.”. Nature Neuroscience, 19(3), 366.
Rezapour, T., Ekhtiyari, H., & Soltaninejad, Z. (2013). procedure and scoring of Persian paper and pencil cognitive assessment package (PCAP). MEHRSA publication.
Ruiz, D., & Newell, A. (1989). Tower-noticing triggers strategy-change in the Tower of Hanoi: A Soar model. CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA DEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY.
Saed, O., Rushan, R., & Moradi, A. R. (2008). Investigating psychometric properties of Wechsler Memory Scale-for the students of Tehran Universities.
Sliwinski, M. J., Mogle, J. A., Hyun, J., Munoz, E., Smyth, J. M., & Lipton, R. B. (2018). Reliability and validity of ambulatory cognitive assessments. Assessment, 25(1), 14-30.
Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., Kristen, S., & Perst, H. (2012). Metacognition in infants and young children. Foundations of metacognition, 119-133.
Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2015). Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 156-162.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Psychology Press.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press
Turnbull, O. H., Denis, M., Mellet, E., Ghaëm, O., & Carey, D. P. (2012). The processing of visuo-spatial information: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging investigations. In Imagery, Language and Visuo-Spatial Thinking (pp. 97-124). Psychology Press.
Van Rooij, M. M., & Favela, L. H. (2016). A nonlinear dynamical systems theory perspective on dual-processing accounts of decision-making under uncertainty.
Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 56, pp. 185-227). Academic Press.
Williams, M., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1206.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
