Influence of tranformational leadership in decreasing task conflicts through prevention oriented proactive behaviour
Keywords:
transformational leadership, proactive work, behaviour, prevention-oriented initiative, task conflictsAbstract
Transformational leadership is widely thought to cause change in individuals, systems, and processes, ultimately leading to innovation and change. This paper discusses transformational leadership's behavioural pattern toward task conflict resolution by followers. The study aims to find the relationship between transformational leadership and prevention oriented proactive behaviour to decrease the task conflicts of employees. This article attempts to provide logical and overall understanding of how transformational leadership builds the proactive behaviour of employees in particular the prevention-oriented initiative among various situational constraints. And this paper tries to prove the prevention-oriented initiative to decrease the task conflicts. To test hypothesis data were collected from 170 respondents working in various companies through disproportionate quota sampling. The results of the survey supported the proposed hypothesis that organizational leaders can use to build positive employee behavior within the organization. This study also adds value by supporting the relationship between transformational leadership and active employee behaviour using self-conceptual leadership theory and social exchange theory.
Downloads
References
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990’s. Journal of Management, 25, 293–315.
Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (in press). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and changeoriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
Eun Kyung Lee, Ariel C. Avgar, Won-Woo Park, Daejeong Choi, (2018) "The dual effects of task conflict on team creativity: Focusing on the role of team-focused transformational leadership", International Journal of Conflict Management.
Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human performance, 14(1), 97-124.
Jex, S. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kuo, Ye, Chen, M. & Chen, L. H. (2017). Psychological Flexibility at Work and Employees’ Proactive Work Behaviour: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Leader Need for Structure. Applied Psychology, 67(3), 454–472. doi:10.1111/apps.12111
Lee, E. Avgar, Park, & Choi, D. (2018). The dual effects of task conflict on team creativity. International Journal of Conflict Management. doi:10.1108/ijcma-02-2018-0025
Raabe, B., Frese, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2007). Action regulation theory and career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 297–311
Saifulina, N., & Carballo-Penela, A. (2016). Promoting Sustainable Development at an Organizational Level: An Analysis of the Drivers of Workplace Environmentally Friendly Behaviour of Employees. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 299–310. doi:10.1002/sd.1654
Schmitt, A., Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2016). Transformational leadership and proactive work behaviour: A moderated mediation model including work engagement and job strain. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 89(3), 588-610.
Simons, Tony L., Peterson, Randall S. (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust.
Spychala, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). The dark and the bright sides of proactive work behaviour and situational constraints: Longitudinal relationships with task conflicts. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 20(5), 654-680.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.








