Comparison of thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization techniques on pain in athletes with chronic ankle sprain

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13738

Authors

  • Sohaib Tahir Department of Physical Therapy, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Amber Shabbir Department of Physical Therapy, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Abdur Rehman Department of Physical Therapy, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Maida Mahmood Department of Physical Therapy, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Amna Ishtiaq Khan Department of Physical Therapy, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan

Keywords:

Chronic Ankle Sprain, Thrust Manipulation, Non-Thrust Mobilization, NPRS and Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Chronic ankle sprains can be effectively treated with either thrust manipulation or non-thrust mobilisation of the ankle joint, according to a number of studies. On the other hand, it is unknown if thrust manipulation or non-thrust mobilization is superior to other techniques in terms of improving clinical and functional outcomes. Comparison of the pain-relieving benefits of thrust manipulation versus non-thrust mobilization was the primary objective of this study, which was conducted on athletes with chronic ankle sprains. Methodology: It was a randomized control trial. The study was completed from May 2021 to Jan 2022 and it was conducted at Pakistan sports board and Model town football club, Lahore. Purposive sampling techniques was used to collect the data as per inclusion criteria the participant age between 16 to 40 years males. Screening was carried out of 30 participants, 20 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 16 finally gave written consent for enrollment in the study. All the participants were placed into two groups by sealed envelope method. In group A high-velocity manual intervention was given at proximal and distal tibiofibular joint, and distraction thrust manipulation technique at talo-crural joint.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Halabchi F, Hassabi M. Acute ankle sprain in athletes: Clinical aspects and algorithmic approach. World J Orthop. 2020;11(12):534-58.

Gulbrandsen M, Hartigan DE, Patel KA, Makovicka JL, Tummala SV, Chhabra A. Ten-Year Epidemiology of Ankle Injuries in Men's and Women's Collegiate Soccer Players. J Athl Train. 2019;54(8):881-8.

Alghadir AH, Iqbal ZA, Iqbal A, Ahmed H, Ramteke SU. Effect of Chronic Ankle Sprain on Pain, Range of Motion, Proprioception, and Balance among Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15).

Bellows R, Wong CK. The Effect Of Bracing And Balance Training On Ankle Sprain Incidence Among Athletes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13(3):379-88.

D'Hooghe P, Cruz F, Alkhelaifi K. Return to Play After a Lateral Ligament Ankle Sprain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(3):281-8.

Walls RJ, Ross KA, Fraser EJ, Hodgkins CW, Smyth NA, Egan CJ, et al. Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management. World J Orthop. 2016;7(1):8-19.

Gerstner JB, Méndez Lavergne OA, Blanco FAL, Gerstner Saucedo J, Ramírez Dávila CE. Arthroscopically Assisted Technique for Combined Medial and Lateral Ligament Repair in Multidirectional Ankle Instability. Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery. 2021;20(4).

Mauntel TC, Wikstrom EA, Roos KG, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Kerr ZY. The Epidemiology of High Ankle Sprains in National Collegiate Athletic Association Sports. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2156-63.

Sharma S, Dhillon MS, Kumar P, Rajnish RK. Patterns and Trends of Foot and Ankle Injuries in Olympic Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54(3):294-307.

Camacho LD, Roward ZT, Deng Y, Latt LD. Surgical Management of Lateral Ankle Instability in Athletes. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):639-49.

Demeritt KM, Shultz SJ, Docherty CL, Gansneder BM, Perrin DH. Chronic ankle instability does not affect lower extremity functional performance. Journal of athletic training. 2002;37(4):507.

Elbeltagy AMF, Ashoub MMA, Ahmed SSM. Surgical Modalities versus Conservative Treatment for Acute Injuries of Lateral Ligament of Ankle. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2021;114(Supplement_1):hcab104.020.

Eom SY, Lee WJ, Lee JI, Lee EH, Lee HY, Chung EJ. The effect of ankle Kinesio taping on range of motion and agility during exercise in university students. Physical therapy rehabilitation science. 2014;3(1):63-8.

Medina McKeon JM, Hoch MC. The Ankle-Joint Complex: A Kinesiologic Approach to Lateral Ankle Sprains. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):589-602.

Cleland JA, Mintken P, McDevitt A, Bieniek M, Carpenter K, Kulp K, et al. Manual physical therapy and exercise versus supervised home exercise in the management of patients with inversion ankle sprain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2013;43(7):443-55.

Coulter ID, Crawford C, Vernon H, Hurwitz EL, Khorsan R, Booth MS, et al. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for an appropriateness panel. Pain physician. 2019;22(2):E55.

Salgado AS, Stramosk J, Ludtke DD, Kuci AC, Salm DC, Ceci LA, et al. Manual therapy reduces pain behavior and oxidative stress in a murine model of complex regional pain syndrome type I. Brain sciences. 2019;9(8):197.

Zhu Y, Yang Y, Guo J, Zhang W, Zhu Z, Xie B, et al. Abdominal manual therapy repairs interstitial cells of cajal and increases colonic c-Kit expression when treating bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury. BioMed research international. 2017;2017.

Santos FM, Silva JT, Rocha IRC, Martins DO, Chacur M. Non-pharmacological treatment affects neuropeptide expression in neuropathic pain model. Brain research. 2018;1687:60-5.

Duarte FC, Kolberg C, Riffel APK, Souza JA, Belló-Klein A, Partata WA. Spinal manipulation therapy improves tactile allodynia and peripheral nerve functionality and modulates blood oxidative stress markers in rats exposed to knee-joint immobilization. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2019;42(6):385-98.

Reed WR, Cranston JT, Onifer SM, Little JW, Sozio RS. Decreased spontaneous activity and altered evoked nociceptive response of rat thalamic submedius neurons to lumbar vertebra thrust. Experimental brain research. 2017;235(9):2883-92.

Whitman JM, Cleland JA, Mintken P, Keirns M, Bieniek ML, Albin SR, et al. Predicting short-term response to thrust and nonthrust manipulation and exercise in patients post inversion ankle sprain. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2009;39(3):188-200.

Slaven EJ, Mathers J. Management of chronic ankle pain using joint mobilization and ASTYM® treatment: a case report. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2011;19(2):108-12.

Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL, MacDonald C, Childs JD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Physical therapy. 2007;87(4):431-40.

Brantingham JW, Bonnefin D, Perle SM, Cassa TK, Globe G, Pribicevic M, et al. Manipulative therapy for lower extremity conditions: update of a literature review. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2012;35(2):127-66.

BL LSRSA. Gayle R Pidcoe P. Postural-stability tests that identify individuals with chronic ankle instability J Athl Train. 2014;49(1):15-23.

Bassett SF, Prapavessis H. Home-based physical therapy intervention with adherence-enhancing strategies versus clinic-based management for patients with ankle sprains. Physical therapy. 2007;87(9):1132-43.

Published

09-12-2022

How to Cite

Tahir, S., Shabbir, A., Rehman, M. A., Mahmood, M., & Khan, A. I. (2022). Comparison of thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization techniques on pain in athletes with chronic ankle sprain. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S9), 4354–4362. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13738

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles