Role of transcerebellar diameter in fetal growth assessment and its correlation with conventional biometry-An institutional study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS7.13767

Authors

  • Doddamani Diwakar Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Sridhar MN Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Avinash Katur Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJM Medical College, Davangere -577004, Karnataka, India
  • Kiran Kumar M Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

transcerebellar, TCD, pregnancy

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of gestational age (GA) for fetal development is of paramount importance in management of pregnancy and for favorable perinatal outcome.  The estimation of GA by fetal biometry using Biparietal Diameter (BPD), Head Circumference (HC), Abdominal Circumference (AC) and Femoral Length (FL) in estimation of gestational age (GA) is routinely followed. However, these parameters have limitations. BPD and HC are not reliable in third trimester; FL may be reduced in IUGR and skeletal malformations. Thus we evaluated the Transcerebellar diameter (TCD) as an alternate indicator for fetal growth and GA estimation. Aim: To validate the accuracy of TCD with fetal biometry and calculated ultrasound age (CUA) in assessment of fetal growth and GA in between 18 to 40 weeks of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: The prospective study was carried out with 200 pregnant women between 18 to 40 weeks referred to Radiology department ((JJM Medical College), for antenatal scanning. The subjects were divided into two groups (second and third trimesters). TCD was measured along with other routine parameter for growth assessment. Thus, calculated gestational age (GA) using TCD was compared with GA by Last menstrual period (LMP) and calculated ultrasound age (CUA). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kalish PB, Chervenak FA. Sonographic determination of gestational age. The Ultrasound review of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;5(4):254-58.

Dewhurst CJ, Beazley JM, Campell S. Assessment of fetal maturity and dysmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;113:141-49.

Hashimoto K, Shimizu T, Shimoya K, Kanzaki T, Clapp JF, Murata Y. Fetal cerebellum: US appearance with advancing gestational age. Radiology.2001;221(1):70-74

Gupta AD, Banerjee A, Rammurthy N, Revati P, Jose J. Gestational age estimation using transcerebellar diameter with grading of fetal cerebellar growth. National Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2012; 1(3); 115-20.

Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Betheras FR. Measurement of transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm Neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age. Australian Radiology. 2001;45(3):309-12.

Donald I. Ultrasonics and other electronic techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1962;69:1036-38.

Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Oyelese Y, Vintzileos AM. Foetal transcerebellar diameter measurement with particular emphasis in the third trimester: a reliable predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191:979–84.

Naseem F, Ali S, Basit U, Fatima N. Assessment of gestational age; comparison between transcerebellar diameter versus femur length on ultrasound in third trimester of pregnancy. Professional Med J.2014;21(2):412-17

Joshi BR. Fetal transcerebellar diameter nomogram in Nepalese population. Journal of Institute of Medicine. 2010;32(1):19-23

Ramireddy HR, Kumar P, Mahale A. Significance of fetal transcerebellar diameter in fetal biometry- A pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6);01-04

Published

01-08-2022

How to Cite

Diwakar, D., Sridhar, M. N., Katur, A., & Kumar M , K. (2022). Role of transcerebellar diameter in fetal growth assessment and its correlation with conventional biometry-An institutional study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S7), 6609–6616. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS7.13767

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles