Comparison of shear stress acting on the severely worn anterior canine restored with 2 different restorations
An in vitro study
Keywords:
shear stress acting, different restorations, anterior canineAbstract
Aim: To compare fracture resistance of severely destructed mandibular canine under oblique loading restored with Richmond crown verses zirconia endocrown. Materials and method: 10 mandibular canine were endodontically treated and divided into 2 group of 5 each both the group were cut 2mm above the cement enamel junction one group received endo crown and second group received cast metal post and core, both the group were subjected shear force on UTM at cross head speed of 1 mm/min the results obtained were calculated in newton’s and statistical analysis was carried out. Results: Cast metal post and core (972.4±217.51N) showed better resistance to fracture than Richmond crown group (1180.6±168.87N).statistical analysis done using unpaired t test (P value =0.1818) which was which was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: endocrown showed better resistance to fracture from shear forces than cast metal post and core.
Downloads
References
Biacchi, GR; Basting, RT (2012). Comparison of Fracture Strength of Endocrowns and Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crowns. Operative Dentistry, 37(2), 130–136. doi:10.2341/11-105-L
Chun-Li Lin; Yen-Hsiang Chang; Chia-Yu Chang; Che-An Pai; Shao-Fu Huang (2010). Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. , 118(1), 87–93.
Cialy J, Thalib B, Dharmautama M, Wiro W. Preventive and conservative prosthodontic treatment using overdenture and Richmond crown. J Dentomaxillofac Sci.2016;1(3):193-195
David Assif; Colin Gorfil (1994). Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. , 71(6), 0–567.
Dejak, Beata; Młotkowski, Andrzej (2017). Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, (), S188319581730083.
Fernandes AS, Dessai GS (2001) Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 14: 355-363.
Gary E. Guzy; Jack I. Nicholls (1979). In vitro comparison of intact endodntically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. , 42(1), 39–44.
Gonga R, Jagadish S, Shashikala K, Keshavprasad BS. Restoration of badly broken endodontically treated posterior teeth.J Conserv Dent.2009;12(3):123-128.
Hayashi, M., Takahashi, Y., Imazato, S., & Ebisu, S. (2006). Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dental Materials, 22(5), 477–485.
Ko C, Chu C, Chung K, Lee M. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthetic Dent 1992; 68:421–7.
Nandal, N. Impact of product innovation on the financial performance of the selected organizations: A study in indian context. Psychol. Educ. J. 2021, 58, 5152–5163.
Pandey P, Sharma R, Chhajlani A, Shetty P, Metgud S. Managing fractured incisor with Richmond crown-A case report. Int J Curr Res 2016;8(11):770-774.
Prateek Mishra, Sneha S. Mantri, Suryakant Deogade ,Pushkar Gupta;Richmond crown a lost state of art International Journal of Dental and Health Sciences2015; Volume 02, Issue 02 443-453.
Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endodont 1989;15:512–6.
Sangur R, Sinha A, Bajwa W. restoration of badly mutilated posterior teeth using Richmond crown: A case report. Rama Univ J Dent Sci.2016;3(1):20-23.
Sevimli, Gaye; Cengiz, Seda; Oruç, Selçuk (2015). ENDOCROWNS: REVIEW. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, 49(2), 57–.
Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthetic Dent 1999;81:262–9.
Sreenivasa Rao VeerankI,"Artificial Intelligence Convolution Neural Networks Image Processing for Health Care”, International Conference on Latest Advancements & Future Trends In Engineering, Science & Management, ISBN:978-93-87793-86-6,03rd-04th May 2019, sreeni.bi@gmail.com, http://proceeding.conferenceworld.in/SAiT_2019/96SMmwMneuvsKS685.pdf
Successful Rehabilitation of Anterior Crowns with Richmond Crown: Case Series
Yang H-S, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthetic Dent 2001;85:558–67.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
