To evaluate the quality of successful ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its correlation with perfusion index ratio

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.14151

Authors

  • Manu Singh Department of Anesthesia, UP University of Medical Science Saifai Etawah, India
  • Dheer Singh Department of Anesthesia, UP University of Medical Science Saifai Etawah, India
  • Atit Department of Anesthesia, UP University of Medical Science Saifai Etawah, India
  • Deepa Ekka Department of Anesthesia, RSDKS, Government Medical college, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Indhumathi P. S. Department of Anesthesia, UP University of Medical Science Saifai Etawah, India

Keywords:

supraclavicular brachial plexus, perfusion index ratio, upper limb

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block is a popular approach for anesthesia for upper limb surgeries. Perfusion index can considered as an objective measure for peripheral perfusion that can predict peripheral block success. Early and accurate detection of peripheral block success would enable rapid corrective action this would save the operating room time and improve patient satisfaction. The main objective was to evaluate the quality of supraclavicular brachial plexus block and it’s correlation with Perfusion Index ratio.  Method: It was a prospective observational study carried out over a period of 18 months from November 2018 to April 2020 in the department of anesthesia. Patients aged between 18 to 65 years. Written informed consent, 30 patients of either sex, belonging to ASA grade I and II, scheduled for elective upper limb, under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were selected for the study. Quality of block was made on the basis of 3 point scale. Result: In this study we observed that the Perfusion index was significantly higher in blocked limbed at all time points. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Curatolo M, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L. Sensory assessment of regional analgesia in humans: a review of methods and applications. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93:1517–30.

Yamazaki H, Nishiyama J, Suzuki T. Use of perfusion index from pulse oximetry to determine efficacy of stellate ganglion block. Local and Regional Anesthesia 2012; 5:9–14

Abdelnasser A, Abdelhamid B, Elsonbaty A, Hasanin A ,Rady A . Predicting successful supraclavicular brachial plexus block using pulse oximeter perfusion British Journal of Anaesthesia.2017; 119 (2): 276–80

Goldman JM, Petterson MT, Kopotic RJ, Barker SJ. Masimo signal extraction pulse oximetry. J ClinMonitComput 2000; 16: 475–83.

Vermeylen K, EngelenS, Sermeus L, Soetens F, Velde MV. Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks Review and Current Practice.ActaAnaesthesiolBelg 2012; 63(1):15-21.

6)Joseph M. Neal, J.C. Gerancher, James R. Hebl, Brian M, Ilfeld, Colin J.L. McCartney, Carlo D, Franco, Hogan QH, RegAnesth Pain Med. 2009 ; 34(2): 134–170.

Avci A, Gundogdu O. Evaluation of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block With Traditional Methods And Perfusion Index On Upper Extremity Surgeries. Van Tıp Derg2020; 27(1): 38-44.

Klodell CT, Lobato EB, Willert JL, Gravenstein N. Oximetry-Derived Perfusion Index for Intraoperative Identification of Successful Thoracic Sympathectomy. Ann ThoracSurg 2005; 80:467–70.

9)Sahin OF, Kilic ET, Aksoy Y, Kaydu A ,GokcekE.The importance of perfusion index monitoring in evaluating the efficacy of stellate ganglion blockage treatment in Reynaud’s disease. Libyan Journal of Medicine 2018; 13:1, 1422666.

10) Ceylon A, Eskin MB. Evaluation of the success of supraclavicular blockade performed under general anesthesia in arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder by using Perfusion Index. Ortadogu Tip Derg 2020; 12(1): 61-68.

Published

27-12-2021

How to Cite

Singh, M., Singh, D., Atit, Ekka, D., & Indhumathi, P. S. (2021). To evaluate the quality of successful ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its correlation with perfusion index ratio. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S2), 1093–1100. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.14151

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles