To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of implant (JADELLE) and IUCD (COPPER T)

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14400

Authors

  • Rabeea Sadaf Department of Gynae (Gynae - C), Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Laila Nazir SPR, Department of Gynae (Gynae - C), Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Samreen SPR, Department of Gynae (Gynae - C), Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Saman Muddassir SPR, Department of Gynae (Gynae - C), Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Engineer Abdul Bashir Manager digital Transformation Cell, KPK- Culture and tourism authority
  • Kiran Jehangir Resident Gynae, Department of Gynae (Gynae - C), Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

Keywords:

subdermal implant, JADELLE, intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD), Copper-T contraceptive

Abstract

This study aims to compare the performance and side effects of the subdermal implant JADELLE and intrauterine contraceptive device Copper-T as long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. The study design involved a comparative analysis of Jadelle and Copper-T contraceptives, assessing clinical performance and side effects. Sample data from 336 participants was collected using stratified random sampling, with standardized instruments for demographic information, clinical assessment, and contraceptive side effects. Inclusion criteria were reproductive-age multipara women, while exclusion criteria included primary para, preexisting medical disorders, nullipara, and other contraceptive use. Ethical guidelines were followed, ensuring informed consent, privacy, and the right to withdraw. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics, chi-square test, independent samples t-test, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. SPSS (version 23.0) was used for analysis. The comparison between Group A (Jadelle) and Group B (Copper-T) reveals interesting findings. Group A has a higher mean age, but no significant differences in parity, blood pressure, or weight. Group B has more total and ongoing pregnancies. Group A experiences higher prevalence of side effects, including expulsion, infection, severe menstrual changes, pain or discomfort, and mood swings. Blood parameters show no significant differences. Variations exist in follow-up rates, informed consent, and privacy maintenance. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahamondes, L., Brache, V., Meirik, O., Ali, M., Habib, N., Landoulsi, S., & WHO Study Group on Contraceptive Implants for Women (2015). A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 30(11), 2527–2538. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev221

Buasang, K., & Taneepanichskul, S. (2009). Efficacy of celecoxib on controlling irregular uterine bleeding secondary to Jadelle use. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 92(3), 301–307.

Cirrincione, L. R., Nakalema, S., Chappell, C. A., Byakika-Kibwika, P., Kyohairwe, I., Winchester, L., Mackline, H., Pham, M. M., Cohn, S. E., Siccardi, M., Owen, A., Fletcher, C. V., Lamorde, M., & Scarsi, K. K. (2023). Effect of double-dose levonorgestrel subdermal implant in women taking efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy: The DoubLNG pharmacokinetic study. Contraception, 122, 109975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109975

Cleland J, Ali M, Benova L, Daniele M. The promotion of intrauterine contraception in low-and middle-income countries: a narrative review-NCND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 2017 [cited 2020 Jan 16]; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.009

Daniele MAS, Cleland J, Benova L, Ali M. Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review. Reprod Health. 2017 11.

Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2016 Mar 3 [cited 2022 Aug 20]; 374(9):843–52. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmsa1506575

Gonzalo, I. T., Swerdloff, R. S., Nelson, A. L., Clevenger, B., Garcia, R., Berman, N., & Wang, C. (2002). Levonorgestrel implants (Norplant II) for male contraception clinical trials: combination with transdermal and injectable testosterone. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 87(8), 3562–3572. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.8.8710

Laphikanont, W., & Taneepanichskul, S. (2006). Effects of Jadelle used in Thai women aged between 20 and 45 years in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 89(6), 761–766.

Moray, K. V., Chaurasia, H., Sachin, O., & Joshi, B. (2021). A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Reproductive health, 18(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01054-y

NIPS. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey [Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan; Claverton, Maryland, USA; 2012 [cited 2017 Feb 5]. http://www. nips.org.pk/abstract_fles/PDHS Final Report as of Jan 22–2014.pdf

NIPS. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2006–07 [Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan; Claverton, Maryland, USA; 2006 [cited 2017 Feb 5]

NIPS. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. 2017.

Tariq A etalLong-acting reversible contraceptives - Implant vs. Intrauterine Device; Why go for either? Long-acting reversible contraceptives Professional Med J 2023;30(01):51-57.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that only one unintended pregnancy occurs among every 2000-implant users in the first year of use; the effectiveness of IUDs are nearly the same

UNDESA. Trends in contraceptive use Worldwide 2015. Contraception. 2015

Yu, J., Li, J., Li, H. G., Li, J. X., Xie, C. S., & Zhu, C. H. (2008). Comparative study on contraceptive efficacy and clinical performance of the copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite IUD and the copper T220C IUD. Contraception, 78(4), 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.05.008

Published

25-06-2023

How to Cite

Sadaf, R., Nazir, L., Samreen, Muddassir, S., Bashir, E. A., & Jehangir, K. (2023). To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of implant (JADELLE) and IUCD (COPPER T). International Journal of Health Sciences, 7(S1), 1683–1696. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14400

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles