Assessment of the efficacy and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive techniques in dental restoration

Syed Akbar Abbas Zaidi; Anum Arshad; Ammad Jawed; Muhammad Hassan Khursheed; Kulsoom Zahir; Abdul Hadi; Hafiz Mahmood Azam

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14433

Authors

Syed Akbar Abbas Zaidi Assistant Professor, Head of Department of Dental Education, Bahria University Dental College, Bahria University Health Sciences Campus Karachi
Anum Arshad BDS, Demonstrator MBA Health MGT and Pharmaceuticals, Jinnah Medical and Dental College
Ammad Jawed BDS (Pak), MClinDent (UK), MEndo RCS(Ed), MEndo RCS (Eng), MEndo RCPS (Glasg), Senior Registrar/Consultant Endodontist, Azra Naheed Dental College, Superior University, Lahore
Muhammad Hassan Khursheed MDS Operative Dentistry, Dr Ishrat ul Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences
Kulsoom Zahir BDS, RDS, Lecturer, Bahria University Health Sciences Karachi
Abdul Hadi BDS (Final year student), Bahria University Dental College Karachi
Hafiz Mahmood Azam BDS, M.phil, CHPE, Associate Professor, Head of Department Science of Dental Materials, Muhammed Medical and Dental College Mirpurkhas

Keywords:

dental restoration, minimally invasive procedures, effectiveness, long-term results, problems, success rates, restoration durability, patient satisfaction

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and long-term effects of minimally invasive dental repair procedures. Using SPSS, 400 patient records from a supplementary dataset were examined. Examined were the patient satisfaction levels, success rates, durability of the restoration, kind of restoration, material used, and complications. The findings showed that Dental Crowns and Composite Fillings were the two restoration kinds that were most frequently used, with Composite Resin being the favored substance. An important portion of cases had complications, like dental caries and fractures. However, the majority of restorations were effective and left patients with high levels of satisfaction. The statistical studies, which included chi-square tests and ANOVA using SPSS version 2021, revealed no significant correlation between the kind of restoration and problems as well as no significant variation in the longevity of the restorations among the various restoration techniques. These results imply that the selection of a minimally invasive procedure might not have a substantial impact on restoration results. When planning dental restorations, it's crucial to take the preferences and circumstances specific to each patient into account. To validate these results, additional research using bigger sample sizes and detailed databases is advised.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barbato, L., Selvaggi, F., Kalemaj, Z., Buti, J., Bendinelli, E., Marca, M. L., & Cairo, F. (2020). Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) and non-surgical (MINST) treatments of periodontal intra-bony defect. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCT’s. Clinical oral investigations, 24, 1125-1135.

Bishti, S., Tuna, T., Rittich, A., & Wolfart, S. (2021). Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant‐supported reconstructions using digital workflows: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32, 318-335.

Collares, K., Correa, M. B., Bronkhorst, E. M., Laske, M., Huysmans, M. C. D., & Opdam, N. J. (2018). A practice based longevity study on single-unit crowns. Journal of Dentistry, 74, 43-48.

de Carvalho Martins, B. M., da Silva, E. J. N. L., Ferreira, D. M. T. P., Reis, K. R., & da Silva Fidalgo, T. K. (2018). Longevity of defective direct restorations treated by minimally invasive techniques or complete replacement in permanent teeth: a systematic review. Journal of dentistry, 78, 22-30.

dos Santos Girotto, L. P., Chisini, L. A., Lynch, C. D., Blum, I. R., Wilson, N. H., Sarkis-Onofre, R., ... & van de Sande, F. H. (2023). Teaching of composite restoration repair in Brazilian dental schools. Journal of Dentistry, 130, 104410.

Fan, J., Xu, Y., Si, L., Li, X., Fu, B., & Hannig, M. (2021). Long-term clinical performance of composite resin or ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Operative Dentistry, 46(1), 25-44.

Filius, M. A., Cune, M. S., Koopmans, P. C., Vissink, A., Raghoebar, G. M., & Visser, A. (2018). Dental implants with fixed prosthodontics in oligodontia: A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of up to 25 years. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 120(4), 506-512.

González, J. I. C., Anchundia, A. K. M., & Tuarez, C. A. L. (2023). Importance of Minimally Invasive Dentistry: A Literature Review. HIV Nursing, 23(3), 1823-1826.

Hardan, L., Mancino, D., Bourgi, R., Cuevas-Suárez, C. E., Lukomska-Szymanska, M., Zarow, M., ... & Haïkel, Y. (2022). Treatment of Tooth Wear Using Direct or Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Bioengineering, 9(8), 346.

Hasmun, N., Lawson, J., Vettore, M. V., Elcock, C., Zaitoun, H., & Rodd, H. (2018). Change in oral health-related quality of life following minimally invasive aesthetic treatment for children with molar incisor hypomineralisation: a prospective study. Dentistry Journal, 6(4), 61.

Kanzow, P., Wiegand, A., Goestemeyer, G., & Schwendicke, F. (2018). Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. Journal of dentistry, 69, 1-21.

Kattan, W., Urquhart, O., Comnick, C., McQuistan, M. R., Guzmán-Armstrong, S., Kolker, J., & Teixeira, E. C. (2021). Repair versus replacement of defective direct restorations: A cross-sectional study among US dentists. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 152(11), 927-935.

Lempel, E., Lovász, B. V., Bihari, E., Krajczár, K., Jeges, S., Tóth, Á., & Szalma, J. (2019). Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth—Retrospective study up to 13 years. Dental Materials, 35(9), 1308-1318.

LZ, N., Oosterhaven, A., Kleinsman, R., Bäumer-König, A., Körner, G., Wendler, M., & MMM, G. (2023). 8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 67(2), 206-213.

Ohrvik, H. G., & Hjortsjö, C. (2020). Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques. Clinical and experimental dental research, 6(1), 16-23.

Pieralli, S., Kohal, R. J., Rabel, K., von Stein‐Lausnitz, M., Vach, K., & Spies, B. C. (2018). Clinical outcomes of partial and full‐arch all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29, 224-236.

Shu, X., Mai, Q. Q., Blatz, M., Price, R., Wang, X. D., & Zhao, K. (2018). Direct and Indirect Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 Consensus Conference Paper. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 20(3).

Sommerfeldt, W., Gellert, P., Müller, A., Götze, N., & Göstemeyer, G. (2023). Older patients’ perception of treating root caries with silver diamine fluoride–a qualitative study based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Journal of Dentistry, 130, 104408.

Torres, P. J., Phan, H. T., Bojorquez, A. K., Garcia-Godoy, F., & Pinzon, L. M. (2021). Minimally invasive techniques used for caries management in dentistry. A review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 45(4), 224-232.

Yazigi, C., & Kern, M. (2022). Clinical evaluation of zirconia cantilevered single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses replacing missing canines and posterior teeth. Journal of Dentistry, 116, 103907.