Importance of microbiology in autopsy procedure
Keywords:
microorganisms, autopsy procedure, microbiologyAbstract
The importance of bacterial cultures in autopsy has been controversial since Filippo Pacini and Robert Koch's early investigation into the etiology of cholera. Death-war and / or post-mortem invasion by the patient's native flora poses a problem with respect to post-mortem intervals, selection of anatomical location of cultures containing blood, CSF, and number of specimens required to be bought and collected in Microbial Laboratory for processing. Additionally, importance of postmortem virus research is significant. An increasingly important aspect of occupational safety is involved in handling of patient samples by laboratory staff. During the AIDS epidemic, regulatory bodies were urged to reconsider the importance of postmortem microbiological tests. This editorial is used to determine the exact cause of death without sacrificing the logistical and human resources of the Institute of Microbiology Practical sampling guidelines. The American University of Pathologists (CAP) are known to have developed a general checklist item for performing autopsy, but there are no specific guidelines, recommendations, or checklist items to address performance criteria for postmortem microbial culture studies. This review provides a brief historical perspective on autopsy microbiology, including a discussion of concerns about the postmortem spread of microorganisms, followed by a description of how to sample.
Downloads
References
Achard C, Phulpin E. 1985. L’envahissement des organs par les microbes pendant l’agonie et après la mort. Arch. Med. Exp. 7:25–47.
Burn CC. 1934. Experimental studies of postmortem bacterial invasion in animals. J. Infect. Dis. 54:388 –394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/54.3.388.
Burton EC, Phillips RS, Covinsky KE, Sands LP, Goldman L, Dawson NV, Connors AF, Landefeld CS. 2004. The relation of autopsy rate to physicians’ beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy. Am. J. Med. 117:255–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.028.
Burton EC. 2002. The autopsy: a professional responsibility in assuring quality of care. Am. J. Med. Qual. 17:56 –60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177 /106286060201700203.
Carpenter HM, Wilkins RM. 1964. Autopsy bacteriology: review of 2,033 cases. Arch. Pathol. 77:73–81.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 2007. Principles and procedures for blood cultures. Approved guideline (M47-A), vol 27, no 17. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
College of American Pathologists (CAP). 2013. Anatomic pathology checklist: autopsy checklist, p 58 –68. http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/laboratory_accreditation/checklists/new/anatomic_pathology_checklist .pdf.
du Moulin G, Patterson DG. 1985. Clinical relevance of postmortem microbiologic examination, a review. Hum. Pathol. 16:539 –548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(85)80102-7.
Epstein EZ, Kugel MA. 1929. The significance of postmortem bacteriological examination. J. Infect. Dis. 44:327–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093 /infdis/44.4.327.
Fredette JW. 1916. Bacteremias in the agonal period. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2:180 –188.
Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. 1983. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N. Engl. J. Med. 308:1000 –1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198304283081704.
Gradwohl RBH. 1904. Importance de l’examen bactériolique pratiqué sur les cadavers. Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris) 18:767–773.
Hanterdsith B, Tharavichitkul P, Mahanupab P, Raksamat W. 2013. Postmortem diagnosis of sudden unexpected death from Streptococcus suis type 2 infection: a case report. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 20:347–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.002.
Hove M, Pencil SD. 1998. Effect of postmortem sampling technique on the clinical significance of autopsy blood cultures. Hum. Pathol. 29:137– 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90223-4.
Hoyert DL, Xu J. 2012. Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 61:1–52.
Kellerman GD, Waterman NG, Scharfenberger LF. 1976. Demonstration in vitro of postmortem bacterial transmigration. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 66:911–915.
Knapp VJ. 1983. Postmortem and the growth of modern medical knowledge in 19th century Europe. J. Okla. State Med. Assoc. 76:73–76.
Koneman EW, Davis MA. 1974. Postmortem bacteriology. 3. Clinical significance of microorganisms recovered at autopsy. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 61:28 –40. Minireview April 2014 Volume 52 Number 4 jcm.asm.org 1031 on June 24, 2014 by Bibliotheque de l'Universite Laval http://jcm.asm.org/
Lobmaier IVK, Vege A, Gaustad P, Rognum TO. 2009. Bacteriological investigation—significance of time lapse after death. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:1191–1198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009 -0762-0.
Lundberg GD. 1998. Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. JAMA 280:1273– 1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.14.1273.
Mazuchowski EL, Meier PA. 2005. The modern autopsy: what to do if infection is suspected. Arch. Med. Res. 36:713–723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.04.006.
Melvin JR, Cronholm LS, Isaacs AM. 1984. Bacterial transmigration as an indicator of time of death. J. Forensic Sci. 29:412–417.
Minckler TM, Newell GR, O’Toole WF, Niwayama G, Levine PH. 1966. Microbiology experience in collection of human tissue. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45:85–92.
Morris JA, Harrison LM, Partridge SM. 2007. Practical and theoretical aspects of postmortem bacteriology. Curr. Diagn. Pathol. 13:65–74. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdip.2006.07.005.
Nehring JR, Sheridan MF, Funk WF. 1972. Possibility of postmortem bacterial transmigration. New methods of evaluation. Arch. Pathol. 93: 266 –270.
Newsom IE, Cross F, Dobbins HS. 1929. Pathogenic spore-bearing anaerobes in the carcasses of sheep. J. Infect. Dis. 45:386 –392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/45.5.386.
O’Toole WF, Saxena HM, Golden A, Ritts RE. 1965. Studies of postmortem microbiology using sterile autopsy technique. Arch. Pathol. 80: 540 –547.
Roberts FJ. 1969. A review of postmortem bacteriologic cultures. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 100:70 –74.
Roberts FJ. 1987. The association of antimicrobial therapy with postmortem spleen culture in bacteremic patients. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 87:770 – 772.
Rose GW, Hockett RN. 1971. The microbiologic evaluation and enumeration of postmortem specimens from human remains. Health Lab. Sci. 8:75–78.
Sadler DW. 1998. The value of a thorough protocol in the investigation of sudden infant deaths. J. Clin. Pathol. 51:689 –694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.51.9.689.
Saegeman V, Verhaegen J, Lismont D, Verduyckt B, De Rijdt T, Ectors N. 2009. Influence of postmortem time on the outcome of blood cultures among cadaveric tissue donors. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28: 161–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0609-0.
Schneider V. 1985. Value of bacteriological investigations within the scope of forensic autopsies. Z. Rechtsmed. 94:81–92. (In German.)
Shafi MS. 1976. A study of spleen cultures postmortem. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 30:190 –192.
Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. 2003. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected errors over time. JAMA 289:2849 –2856. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.21.2849.
Silver H, Sonnenwirth AC. 1969. A practical and efficacious method for obtaining significant postmortem blood cultures. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 52: 433–437.
Smith RF, Linares HA, Jorgensen JH. 1975. Bacteremia and postmortem microbiology in burned children. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 63:502–508.
Søgaard P, Larsen KE, Buhl L, Lou HE, Henriques U. 1991. Bacteriological autopsy. I. A methodological study. APMIS 99:541–544.
Tajiri T, Tate G, Masunaga A, Miura K, Masuda S, Kunimura T, Mitsuya T, Morohoshi T. 2012. Autopsy cases of fulminant bacterial infection in adults: clinical onset depends on the virulence of bacteria and patient immune status. J. Infect. Chemother. 18:637–645. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s10156-012-0384-9.
Thorn JL, Gilchrist KB, Sobonya RE, Gaur NK, Lipke PN, Klotz SA. 2010. Postmortem candidemia: a marker of disseminated disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 63:337–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2009.070607.
Traeger MS, Wiersma ST, Rosenstein NE, Malecki JM, Shepard CW, Raghinathan PL, Pllai P, Popovic T, Quinn CP, Meyer RF, Zaki SR, Kumar S, Bruce SM, Sejvar JJ, Dull PM, Tierney BC, Jones JD, Perkins BA; Florida Investigation Team. 2002. First case of bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax in the United States, Palm Beach County, Florida, 2001. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:1029 –1034. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810 .020354.
Tsokos M, Püschel K. 2001. Postmortem bacteriology in forensic pathology: diagnostic value and interpretation. Leg. Med. (Tokyo) 3:15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1344-6223(01)00002-5.
Tuomisto S, Karhunen PJ, Vuento R, Aittoiemi J, Pessi T. 2013. Evaluation of postmortem bacterial migration using culturing and realtime quantitative PCR. J. Forensic Sci. 58:910 –916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12124.
Turner GDH, Bunthi C, Wonodi CB, Morpeth SC, Molyneux CS, Zaki SR, Levine OS, Murdoch DR, Scott JAG. 2012. The role of postmortem studies in pneumonia etiology research. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54(Suppl 2): S165–S171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir1062.
Wilson SJ, Wilson ML, Reller RB. 1993. Diagnostic utility of postmortem blood cultures. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 117:986 –988.
Wilson WR, Dolan CT, Washington JA, Brown AL, Ritts RE. 1972. Clinical significance of postmortem cultures. Arch. Pathol. 94:244 –249.
Wise R. 1976. The ‘septic spleen’—a critical evaluation. J. Clin. Pathol. 29:228 –230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.29.3.228.
Wood WH, Oldstone M, Schultz RB. 1965. A re-evaluation of blood culture as an autopsy procedure. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 43:241–247.
York MK, Henry M, Gilligan P. 2010. Blood cultures: general description and interpretation, p 3.4.1. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
Zanen-Lim OG, Zanen HC. 1980. Postmortem bacteriology of the lung by printculture of frozen tissue. J. Clin. Pathol. 33:474 –480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.33.5.474.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of health sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.








