A randomized controlled trial for comparing the results of early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and conservative treatment in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14679

Authors

  • Ahmed Omaia Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
  • Khalil Ali Khalil Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
  • Seham A. Omar Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
  • Mohammed Mahmoud Abdo Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Keywords:

acute gallstone pancreatitis, ERCP, pancreatitis, results ERCP

Abstract

Introduction: Gallstone pancreatitis is one of the most dangerous complications of gallstone disease with a high risk of complications and death. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and timely management of acute gallstone pancreatitis are very important. Most guidelines recommend urgent ERCP in cases of biliary obstruction with cholangitis. However, the best time to perform an ERCP in patients suffering from acute gallstone pancreatitis without cholangitis is not universally agreed upon. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of early ERCP versus conservative management in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis in terms of complications, mortality, and length of hospital stays. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Suez Canal University Hospitals between January 2020 and January 2022. After meeting the inclusion criteria, forty patients were enrolled in this study and were allocated randomly into ERCP and Conservative groups. A written informed consent form was taken from all patients. Patient demographics, symptoms, and a detailed history were all collected. Laboratory tests were performed and reported. ERCP's findings were reported. A total of 40 patients were included in the study. The average age was 42 years in the ERCP group and 39 in the conservative group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege S: American College of Gastroenterology Guideline: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013, 108:1400-1415. 10.1038/ajg.2013.218

Roberts S, Morrison-Rees S, John A, Williams J, Brown T, Samuel D: The incidence and etiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe. Pancreatology. 2017, 17(2):155-165. 10.1016/j.pan.2017.01.005

Krishna S, Kamboj A, Hart P, Hinton A, Conwell D: The changing epidemiology of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations: a decade of trends and the impact of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2017, 46:482-488. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000783

Fagenholz P, Castillo C, Harris N, Pelletier A, Camargo, C: Increasing United States Hospital Admissions for Acute Pancreatitis, 1988-2003.. Annals of Epidemiology. 2007, 17:491.e1-491.e8. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.02.002

Yadav D, Lowenfels A: Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systemic review. Pancreas. 2006, 33(4):323-330. 10.1097/01.mpa.0000236733.31617.52

Lee H, Chung M, Park J, et al.: Urgent ERCP is not superior to early ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis with biliary obstruction without cholangitis. PLOS ONE. 2018, 13:0190835. 10.1371/ journal.pone.0190835

Moretti A, Papi C, Aratari A, et al.: Is early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography useful in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Digestive and liver disease. 2008, 40:379-385. 10.1016/j.dld.2007.12.001

Anderloni A, Repici, A: Role and timing of endoscopy in acute biliary pancreatitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015, 21:11205-11208. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11205

Omar M and Hamed M: Acute Biliary Pancreatitis - Optimal Time for Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study. Clin Surg. 2018, 3:2151.

Nguyen G, Rosenberg M, Chong R, Chong C: Early cholecystectomy and ERCP are associated with reduced readmissions for acute biliary pancreatitis: a nationwide, population-based study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012, 75:47-55. 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.028

Cavdar F, Yildar M, Tellioğlu G, Kara M, Tilki M, Titiz, M: Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: When should we perform MRCP and ERCP? Pancreatology. 2014, 14:411-414. 10.1016/j.pan.2014.08.002

Svatoň R, Kala Z, Novotný I, Trna J, Andrášina T, Kunovský L: The timing of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis. Perspectives in Surgery: Monthly of the Czechoslovak Surgical Society. 2019, 98:10-13.

Kodliwadmath H, Pai B, Ubarale M: Acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective observational hospital-based study. International Surgery Journal. 2020, 7:2116-2120. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202530

Fogel E, Sherman S: ERCP for gallstone pancreatitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014, 370(2):150-157. 10.1056/NEJMct1208450

Coutinho L, Bernardo W, Rocha R, et al.: Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography versus Conservative Treatment in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2018, 47:444-453. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001032

Petrov M, van Santvoort H, Besselink M, van der Heijden G, van Erpecum K, Gooszen H: Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Annals of Surgery. 2008, 247:250-257. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815edddd

Acosta J, Katkhouda N, Debian K, Groshen S, Tsao-Wei D, Berne T: Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery. 2006, 243:33-40. 10.1097/01.sla.0000194086.22580.92

Uy M, Daez M, Sy P, Banez V, Espinosa W, Talingdan-Te M.: Early ERCP in acute gallstone pancreatitis without cholangitis: A Meta-analysis ‏. JOP. J Pancreas (ed): 10(3), 299-305; 2009.

Pécsi D, Gódi S, Hegyi P, et al.: ERCP is more challenging in cases of acute biliary pancreatitis than in acute cholangitis - Analysis of the Hungarian ERCP registry data. Pancreatology. 2021, 21:59-63. 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.025

Halász A, Pécsi D, Farkas N, et al.: Outcomes and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute biliary pancreatitis. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2019, 51:1281-1286. 10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.018

Fogel E, Sherman S: Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: When should the endoscopist intervene? Gastroenterology. 2003, 125:229-235. 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00806-0

Ayub K, Slavin J, Imada R: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Systemic Reviews. 2004, 10.1002/14651858.CD003630.pub2

Schepers N, Hallensleben ND, Besselink M, et al.: Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment in predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (APEC): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2020, 396:167-176. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30539-0

Published

26-12-2023

How to Cite

Omaia, A., Khalil, K. A., Omar, S. A., & Abdo, M. M. (2023). A randomized controlled trial for comparing the results of early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and conservative treatment in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. International Journal of Health Sciences, 7(S1), 3031–3042. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14679

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles