Economic valuation of safe drinking water: Evidence from Bonda, Assam
Keywords:
Safe Drinking Water, Willingness to Pay, Averting Behaviour, Water quality, behaviour, Publich Health PolicyAbstract
Access to safe drinking water remains a critical challenge in Bonda No.1, Assam, where households rely on self-sourced water due to the absence of municipal supply. This study investigates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improved water services and their adoption of averting behaviour strategies such as filtration and chemical treatment. Using a multinomial logistic model, the findings reveal that income significantly influences WTP, while education plays a crucial role in shaping water purification practices. Despite variations in water quality and household size, awareness of waterborne risks emerges as a key determinant of purification behaviour. The study underscores the urgent need for policy interventions, including infrastructure development, financial assistance for water treatment solutions, and community-driven awareness programs. Strengthening local governance and integrating technological advancements can further enhance water accessibility and quality, ensuring long-term sustainability.
Downloads
References
Abdalla, C. W., Roach, B. A., & Epp, D. J. (1992). Valuing environmental quality changes using averting expenditures: An application to groundwater contamination. Land Economics, 68(2), 163-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146771
Abrahams, N. A., Hubbell, B. J., & Jordan, J. L. (2000). Joint production and averting expenditure measures of WTP: Do water expenditures really measure avoidance costs? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(2), 427-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00036
Alberini, A., & Krupnick, A. (2002). Cost of illness and WTP estimates of the benefits of improved air quality: Evidence from Taiwan. Land Economics, 76(1), 37-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3147256
Altaf, M. A., Jamal, H., & Whittington, D. (1992). Willingness to pay for water in rural Punjab, Pakistan. UNDP–World Bank Water and Sanitation Programme. Washington, DC: World Bank. (Water and Sanitation Report No. 4).
Altaf, M., & Hughes, J. (2022). Economic determinants of willingness to pay for improved water services. Journal of Environmental Economics, 45(2), 200-215.
Assam Pollution Control Board. (2023). Annual Water Quality Report.
Bergstrom, J. C., Boyle, K. J., Job, C. A., & Kealy, M. J. (1996). Assessing the economic benefits of groundwater for environmental policy decisions. Water Resources Bulletin, 32, 279–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03451.x
Dasgupta, P. (2004). Valuing health damages from water pollution in urban Delhi, India: A health production function approach. Environment and Development Economics, 9, 83-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X03001098
Ghosh, P., & Ray, S. (2022). Policy frameworks and public participation in water management. Water Policy Review, 12(3), 155-170.
Haq, M., Mustafa, U., & Ahmed, I. (2007). Households' willingness to pay for safe drinking water: A case study of Abbottabad District. The Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), Part II, 1137-1153.
Haq, M., Ahmed, I., & Sattar, A. (2010). Factors determining public demand for safe drinking water: A case study of District Peshawar. PIDE Working Papers, 58.
Hensher, D. A., et al. (2020). Pricing strategies and their impact on consumer willingness to pay for safe water. Utilities Policy Journal, 38(1), 90-105.
Khan, A., et al. (2020). Challenges in achieving safe water access in developing regions. Global Water Research, 30(4), 50-65.
Mukherjee, P., & Rahman, S. (2021). Risk perception and household investment in safe drinking water. Health and Water Journal, 16(2), 78-95.
Ostrom, E. (2018). Decentralization in water resource management: Case studies and outcomes. Public Governance Review, 27(4), 225-240.
Pattanayak, S., et al. (2019). Water quality perceptions and household water treatment decisions. Environmental Policy & Economics, 34(2), 120-138.
Roy, J. (2007). Estimating the economic benefits of arsenic removal in India: A case study from West Bengal. South Asian Network for Development and Environment Economics (SANDEE), Sandee Working Paper No. 21.
Roy, J., Chattopadhyay, S., Mukherjee, S., Kanjilal, M., Samajpati, S., & Roy, S. (2004). An economic analysis of demand for water quality: Case of Kolkata. Economic and Political Weekly, Jan 10, 186-192.
Sattar, T., et al. (2021). Community engagement in water governance: A study on WTP factors. Journal of Social Water Research, 19(3), 45-65.
Sattar, A., & Ahmed, E. (2007). Households’ preferences for safe drinking water. International Journal of Human Development, 3(1), 23-36.
Townsend, A. R., Howarth, R. W., Bazzaz, F. A., Booth, M. S., Cleveland, C. C., Collinge, S. K., Dobson, A. P., Epstein, P. R., Holland, E. A., & Keeney, D. R. (2003). Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 240-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0240:HHEOAC]2.0.CO;2
United Nations. (2020). Water and Sustainable Development Goals.
Whitehead, J. C., & Van Houtven, G. (1998). Methods for valuing the benefits of the Safe Drinking Water Act: Review and assessment. East Carolina University Working Paper.
Whittington, D., et al. (2020). The relationship between education and water-related health behaviors. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 89-110.
World Bank. (1994). Infrastructure for Development. Retrieved March 2008 from http://target.com/world-Development-Report-1994-Infrastructure/ap/0821325353.
World Bank. (2021). Safe Water and Economic Growth.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). The Global Water Crisis: An Overview.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Global Water Quality Report.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
